The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology
Abstract
The advent of 'biological internal fixation' is an important development in the surgical management of fractures. Locked nailing has demonstrated that flexible fixation without precise reduction results in reliable healing. While external fixators are mainly used today to provide temporary fixation in fractures after severe injury, the internal fixator offers flexible fixation, maintaining the advantages of the external fixator but allowing long-term treatment. The internal fixator resembles a plate but functions differently. It is based on pure splinting rather than compression. The resulting flexible stabilisation induces the formation of callus. With the use of locked threaded bolts, the application of the internal fixator foregoes the need of adaptation of the shape of the splint to that of the bone during surgery. Thus, it is possible to apply the internal fixator as a minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis (MIPO). Minimal surgical trauma and flexible fixation allow prompt healing when the blood supply to bone is maintained or can be restored early. The scientific basis of the fixation and function of these new implants has been reviewed. The biomechanical aspects principally address the degree of instability which may be tolerated by fracture healing under different biological conditions. Fractures may heal spontaneously in spite of gross instability while minimal, even non-visible, instability may be deleterious for rigidly fixed small fracture gaps. The theory of strain offers an explanation for the maximum instability which will be tolerated and the minimal degree required for induction of callus formation. The biological aspects of damage to the blood supply, necrosis and temporary porosity explain the importance of avoiding extensive contact of the implant with bone. The phenomenon of bone loss and stress protection has a biological rather than a mechanical explanation. The same mechanism of necrosis-induced internal remodelling may explain the basic process of direct healing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The biology of fracture healing
Marsell, R., & Einhorn, T. A. (2011) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031 · Cited by 1,824
Internal plate fixation of fractures: short history and recent developments
Uhthoff, H. K., Poitras, P., & Backman, D. S. (2006) · Journal of Orthopaedic Science · doi:10.1007/s00776-005-0984-7 · Cited by 438
Vi, L., Baht, G. S., Whetstone, H., Ng, A., Wei, Q., Poon, R., Mylvaganam, S., Grynpas, M., & Alman, B. A. (2015) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2422 · Cited by 330
The investigation of bone fracture healing under intramembranous and endochondral ossification
Ghimire, S., Miramini, S., Edwards, G., Rotne, R., Xu, J., Ebeling, P., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Bone Reports · doi:10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100740 · Cited by 83
Biodegradable magnesium alloys for orthopaedic applications
(2021) · PubMed Central · doi:10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.03.005 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Perren, S. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
- Publisher
- British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 2002-11-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1093-1110
- ISSN
- 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2339217045
- Cited by
- 1,247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752
- The paper
- Perren, S. M. (2002). Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures: The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.84b8.13752
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.