Cited by 1,824Bone fractures and treatmentsBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsBone Metabolism and Diseases

The biology of fracture healing

Open access
Marsell, Richard, Einhorn, Thomas A.·2011·Injury

Abstract

The biology of fracture healing is a complex biological process that follows specific regenerative patterns and involves changes in the expression of several thousand genes. Although there is still much to be learned to fully comprehend the pathways of bone regeneration, the over-all pathways of both the anatomical and biochemical events have been thoroughly investigated. These efforts have provided a general understanding of how fracture healing occurs. Following the initial trauma, bone heals by either direct intramembranous or indirect fracture healing, which consists of both intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. The most common pathway is indirect healing, since direct bone healing requires an anatomical reduction and rigidly stable conditions, commonly only obtained by open reduction and internal fixation. However, when such conditions are achieved, the direct healing cascade allows the bone structure to immediately regenerate anatomical lamellar bone and the Haversian systems without any remodelling steps necessary. In all other non-stable conditions, bone healing follows a specific biological pathway. It involves an acute inflammatory response including the production and release of several important molecules, and the recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells in order to generate a primary cartilaginous callus. This primary callus later undergoes revascularisation and calcification, and is finally remodelled to fully restore a normal bone structure. In this article we summarise the basic biology of fracture healing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.031

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fracture healing in humans usually takes several weeks to months, depending on the fracture location, severity, and treatment.

    “Fracture healing is a lengthy process that, in humans, usually takes several weeks to months, depending on the fracture location, severity, and treatment (1).”

    From Methods to accelerate fracture healing – a narrative review from a clinical perspective (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Direct Fracture Healing section says complete healing can take a few months to a few years, while the Gap Healing section describes an initial phase lasting about 3–8 weeks. The paper supports a lengthy, variable process influenced by fixation, but does not establish that healing in humans usually finishes within weeks to months or that its duration depends specifically on fracture location and severity. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [40]Sfeir C Ho L Doll BA Azari K Hollinger JO Lieberman JR Friedlaender GE Fracture repair Bone regeneration and repair 2005 Humana Press Totowa, NJ 21 44

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marsell, R., & Einhorn, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
551-555
ISSN
0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036557984
Cited by
1,824
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 129 · 2025: 148 · 2024: 146 · 2023: 164 · 2022: 154 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 178 · 2019: 149 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 84 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 37
FWCI
41.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (P01AR049920)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bone Metabolism and Diseases
Keywords
fracture healing, bone regeneration, intramembranous ossification, endochondral ossification, acute inflammatory response, mesenchymal stem cells, cartilaginous callus, bone remodeling, gene expression
MeSH terms
Bone and Bones, Bone Regeneration, Female, Humans, Male, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Bone Remodeling, Fracture Healing, Inflammation Mediators, Fractures, Bone, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review