Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Computer-assisted total knee replacement: A CONTROLLED CADAVER STUDY USING A MULTI-PARAMETER QUANTITATIVE CT ASSESSMENT OF ALIGNMENT (THE PERTH CT PROTOCOL)

Open access
Chauhan, S. K., Clark, G. W., Lloyd, S., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W., Sikorski, J. M.·2004·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume

Abstract

A controlled study, comparing computer- and conventional jig-assisted total knee replacement in six cadavers is presented. In order to provide a quantitative assessment of the alignment of the replacements, a CT-based technique which measures seven parameters of alignment has been devised and used. In this a multi-slice CT machine scanned in 2.5 mm slices from the acetabular roof to the dome of the talus with the subject’s legs held in a standard position. The mechanical and anatomical axes were identified, from three-dimensional landmarks, in both anteroposterior and lateral planes. The coronal and sagittal alignment of the prosthesis was then measured against the axes. The rotation of the femoral component was measured relative to the transepicondylar axis. The rotation of the tibial component was measured with reference to the posterior tibial condyles and the tibial tuberosity. Coupled femorotibial rotational alignment was assessed by superimposition of the femoral and tibial axial images. The radiation dose was 2.7 mSV. The computer-assisted total knee replacements showed better alignment in rotation and flexion of the femoral component, the posterior slope of the tibial component and in the matching of the femoral and tibial components in rotation. Differences were statistically significant and of a magnitude that support extension of computer assistance to the clinical situation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Chauhan, S. K., Clark, G. W., Lloyd, S., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W., & Sikorski, J. M.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume
Published
2004-08
Volume
86-B
Issue
6
Pages
818-823
ISSN
  • 0301-620X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5377
OpenAlex
W1938954276
Cited by
272
References
3
FWCI
11.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computer-assisted total knee replacement: A CONTROLLED CADAVER STUDY USING A MULTI-PARAMETER QUANTITATIVE CT ASSESSMENT OF ALIGNMENT (THE PERTH CT PROTOCOL). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456
The paper
Chauhan, S. K., Clark, G. W., Lloyd, S., Scott, R. G., Breidahl, W., & Sikorski, J. M. (2004). Computer-assisted total knee replacement: A CONTROLLED CADAVER STUDY USING A MULTI-PARAMETER QUANTITATIVE CT ASSESSMENT OF ALIGNMENT (THE PERTH CT PROTOCOL). The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.15456

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.