Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 733

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging

Curtis, Mark E., Sondergeld, Carl H., Ambrose, Raymond J., Rai, Chandra S.·2012·AAPG Bulletin

Abstract

Abstract The microstructure of gas shale samples from nine different formations has been investigated using a combination of focused ion beam (FIB) milling and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Backscattered electron (BSE) images of FIB cross sectioned shale surfaces show a complex microstructure with variations observed among the formations. Energy dispersive spectroscopy of the shale cross sections indicates that clay, carbonate, quartz, pyrite, and kerogen are the most prevalent components. In the BSE images, areas of kerogen are observed interspersed with the inorganic grains. Pores are observed in both the kerogen and inorganic matrix with the size, shape, and number of pores varying among the shale samples. By using FIB milling and SEM imaging sequentially and repetitively, three-dimensional (3-D) data sets of SEM images have been generated for each of the shale samples. Three-dimensional volumes of the shales are reconstructed from these images. By setting thresholds on the gray scale, the kerogen and pore networks are segmented out and visualized in the reconstructed shale volumes. Estimates of kerogen and pore volume percentages of the reconstructed shale volumes have been made and range from 0 to 90.0% for the kerogen and 0.2 to 2.3% for pores. Estimates of pore-size distributions suggest that although pores with radii of approximately 3 nm dominate in number, they do not necessarily dominate in total volumetric contribution. Scanning electron microscopy images and 3-D reconstructions reinforce the facts that shales are quite different and that their microstructures are highly variable and complex.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1306/08151110188

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 733

Metadata

Authors
Curtis, M. E., Sondergeld, C. H., Ambrose, R. J., & Rai, C. S.
Venue
AAPG Bulletin
Published
2012-04
Volume
96
Issue
4
Pages
665-677
ISSN
0149-1423 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140460370
Cited by
733
References
2
FWCI
47.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1306/08151110188
The paper
Curtis, M. E., Sondergeld, C. H., Ambrose, R. J., & Rai, C. S. (2012). Microstructural investigation of gas shales in two and three dimensions using nanometer-scale resolution imaging. AAPG Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1306/08151110188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.