The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Pore-scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations
Abstract
Using FIB/SEM imaging technology, a series of 2-D and 3-D submicro-scale investigations are performed on the types of porous constituents inherent to gas shale. A finely-dispersed porous organic (kerogen) material is observed imbedded within an inorganic matrix. The latter may contain larger-size pores of varying geometries although it is the organic material that makes up the majority of gas pore volume, with pores and capillaries having characteristic lengths typically less than 100 nanometers. A significant portion of total gas in-place appears to be associated with inter-connected large nano-pores within the organic material. This observation has several implications on reservoir engineering of gas shales. Primarily, thermodynamics (phase behavior) of fluids in these pores are known to be quite different. Most importantly, gas residing in a small pore or capillary is rarefied under the influence of organic pore walls and shows a density profile across the pore with damped-oscillations. This raises the following serious questions related to gas-in-place calculations: under reservoir conditions, what fraction of the pore volume of the organic material can be considered available for the free gas phase and what fraction is taken up by the adsorbed phase? If a significant fraction of the organic pore volume is taken up by the adsorbed phase, how accurately is the shale gas storage capacity estimated using the conventional volumetric methods? And, finally, do average densities exist for the free and the adsorbed phases and how large would a typical density contrast be in an organic pore for an accurate gas reserve calculation? In order to answer these questions we combine the Langmuir equilibrium adsorption isotherm with the volumetrics for free gas and formulate a new gas-in-place equation accounting for the organic pore space taken up by the sorbed phase. The method yields a total gas-in-place prediction based on a corrected free gas pore volume that is obtained using an average adsorbed gas density. Next, we address the fundamental-level questions related to phase transition in organic matter using equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations involving methane in small carbon slit-pores of varying size and temperature. We predict methane density profiles across the pores and show that (i) an average total thickness for an adsorbed methane layer is typically 0.7 nm, which is roughly equivalent to 4% of a 100 nm diameter pore volume, and (ii) the adsorbed phase density is 1.8-2.0 times larger than that of the bulk methane, i.e., in the absence of pore wall effects. These findings suggest that a significant level of adjustment is necessary in volume calculations, especially for gas shales high in total organic content. Finally, using typical values for the parameters, we perform a series of calculations using the new volumetric method and show a 10-25% decrease in total gas storage capacity compared to that using the conventional approach. This additionally could have a larger impact in shales where the sorbed gas phase is a more significant portion of the total gas-inplace. The new methodology is recommended for estimating shale gas-in-place and the approach could be extended to other unconventional gas-in-place calculations where both sorbed and free gas phases are present.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Computer Simulation of Liquids
P, S., & J, K. (1988) · Journal of Molecular Liquids · doi:10.1016/0167-7322(88)80022-9 · Cited by 15,812
Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications
Frenkel, D., Smit, B., & Ratner, M. A. (1997) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.881812 · Cited by 5,059
Dubinin, M. M. (1960) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60204a006 · Cited by 2,405
Understanding Molecular Simulation
(2002) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-267351-1.x5000-7 · Cited by 2,042
Harris, J. G., & Yung, K. H. (1995) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100031a034 · Cited by 1,555
Thermostat Algorithms for Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Hünenberger, P. H. (2005) · Advances in Polymer Science · doi:10.1007/b99427 · Cited by 614
Impact of Shale Properties on Pore Structure and Storage Characteristics
Bustin, R. M., Bustin, A. M. M., Cui, X., Ross, D. J. K., & Pathi, V. S. M. (2008) · SPE Shale Gas Production Conference · doi:10.2118/119892-ms · Cited by 514
Ozawa, S., Kusumi, S., & Ogino, Y. (1976) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/0021-9797(76)90149-1 · Cited by 339
Describing the Diffusion of Guest Molecules Inside Porous Structures
Krishna, R. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp906879d · Cited by 303
Cited by
Slatt, R. M., & O'Brien, N. R. (2011) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/03301110145 · Cited by 889
Curtis, M. E., Sondergeld, C. H., Ambrose, R. J., & Rai, C. S. (2012) · AAPG Bulletin · doi:10.1306/08151110188 · Cited by 733
Self-citationLiu, F., Ellett, K., Xiao, Y., & Rupp, J. A. (2013) · International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control · doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.04.018 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Ambrose, R. J., Hartman, R. C., Diaz-Campos, M., Akkutlu, I. Y., & Sondergeld, C. H.
- Venue
- SPE Unconventional Gas Conference
- Publisher
- SPE
- Published
- 2010-02-23
- OpenAlex
- W2167355155
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 95.41
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Pore-scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2118/131772-ms
- The paper
- Ambrose, R. J., Hartman, R. C., Diaz-Campos, M., Akkutlu, I. Y., & Sondergeld, C. H. (2010). New Pore-scale Considerations for Shale Gas in Place Calculations. SPE Unconventional Gas Conference. https://doi.org/10.2118/131772-ms
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.