CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Forest Biomass Utilization and ManagementWood Residue Utilization and Solid BiofuelsLogistics and Infrastructure Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Trucking Productivity and Costing Model for Transportation of Recovered Wood Waste in Oregon

Han, Sang-Kyun, Murphy, Glen·2011·Forest Products Journal
DOI 10.13073/0015-7473-61.7.552
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The use of woody biomass has received considerable attention for energy production. However, high production and transportation costs can be a barrier to woody biomass use in some regions. Developing cost-effective transportation systems has become an economically critical issue to expand biomass use. We developed a computer model, named BIOTRANS, to estimate biomass transportation productivity and cost in western Oregon. We used BIOTRANS to evaluate the effects on transportation costs of six different truck configurations, four transported material types, and over 100 travel routes. Different truck configurations, transported material types, and travel route characteristics were found to significantly affect transportation costs. A four-axle truck and single trailer was the most cost-efficient hauling configuration for the conditions studied, and shavings had 30 percent higher trucking costs than other hog fuel, chips, and sawdust.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13073/0015-7473-61.7.552

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Han, S.-K., & Murphy, G.
ORCID
Venue
Forest Products Journal
Publisher
Forest Products Society
Published
2011-11
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
552-560
ISSN
0015-7473 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.13073/0015-7473-61.7.552
OpenAlex
W1987191021
Semantic Scholar
8dd517ee791bb941f6db21c068aae0ec1393166e
Cited by
12
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Forest Products Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Wood Residue Utilization and Solid Biofuels
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Logistics and Infrastructure Analysis
Keywords
truck configuration, travel routes, wood chips, sawdust, wood shavings, biomass energy, western Oregon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review