The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CD163: A Specific Marker of Macrophages in Paraffin-Embedded Tissue Samples
Abstract
Paraffin-section immunohistochemical analysis was performed using a monoclonal antibody against CD163 to evaluate the antibody's usefulness in identifying cells of monocyte/macrophage lineage in normal and neoplastic conditions. Normal human tissue samples and samples from 211 hematopoietic disorders and 115 nonhematopoietic neoplasms were examined. The distribution of KP1 and PG-M1, monoclonal antibodies to the macrophage-associated CD68 antigen, also were evaluated for comparison. CD163 immunoreactivity was observed in resident macrophages of all normal tissue samples except splenic white pulp macrophages and germinal center tingible body macrophages. Among hematopoietic disorders and nonhematopoietic neoplasms, CD163 expression was restricted largely to cases of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, histiocytic sarcoma, sinus histiocytosis with massive lymphadenopathy, and littoral cell angioma. Acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs) with monocytic differentiation were CD163- with the exception of 1 case of acute monoblastic leukemia. Most myeloid sarcomas also were CD163-. Compared with the CD68 antibodies, CD163 demonstrated greater specificity as a marker of disorders of monocyte/macrophage origin. However, immunohistochemical evaluation of CD163 expression does not seem to be a sensitive means of determining monocytic differentiation in AMLs in paraffin sections or establishing a diagnosis of myeloid sarcoma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ber-MAC3: new monoclonal antibody that defines human monocyte/macrophage differentiation antigen.
Backé, E., Schwarting, R., Gerdes, J., Ernst, M., & Stein, H. (1991) · Journal of Clinical Pathology · doi:10.1136/jcp.44.11.936 · Cited by 92
Cited by
Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy
Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Marchesi, F., & Garlanda, C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00520-5 · Cited by 1,807
The Immunology of Macrophage Activation Syndrome
Crayne, C. B., Albeituni, S., Nichols, K. E., & Cron, R. Q. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00119 · Cited by 633
Kim, W.-K., Alvarez, X., Fisher, J., Bronfin, B., Westmoreland, S., McLaurin, J., & Williams, K. (2006) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.050215 · Cited by 225
Williams, D. W., Eugenin, E. A., Calderon, T. M., & Berman, J. W. (2012) · Journal of Leukocyte Biology · doi:10.1189/jlb.0811394 · Cited by 212
Hwang, Y., Kim, J., Shin, J.-Y., Kim, J.-I., Seo, J.-S., Webster, M. J., Lee, D., & Kim, S. (2013) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2013.94 · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Lau, S. K., Chu, P. G., & Weiss, L. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-11-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 794-801
- ISSN
- 0002-9173 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049714146
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.