Cited by 68Spinal Cord Injury ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Quality of Life in and After Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study

Open access
Lude, P., Kennedy, P., Elfström, M., Ballert, C.·2014·Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the changes in quality of life (QOL) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their close persons during the first 2 years post injury. METHOD: Longitudinal multiple sample multiple wave panel design. Data included 292 patients recruited from Austrian British German Irish and Swiss specialist SCI rehabilitation centers and 55 of their close persons. Questionnaire booklets were administered at 6 weeks 12 weeks 1 year and 2 years after injury to both samples. RESULTS: Study 1 investigated the WHOQOL-BREF domains in individuals with SCI and found differences mostly in the physical domain indicating that QOL increases for persons with SCI from onset. An effect of the culture was observed in the psychological and environmental domains with higher QOL scores in the German-speaking sample. Study 2 compared individuals with SCI to their close persons and found differences in the physical environmental and social domains over time. The scores on the psychological dimension did not significantly differ between the persons with SCI and their close persons over time. CONCLUSION: QOL measured by the WHOQOL-BREF shows that QOL changes during rehabilitation and after discharge. Apart from the physical dimension the persons with SCI and their close persons seem to experience a similar change in QOL. Further longitudinal research is suggested to clarify the mutual adjustment process of people with SCI and their close persons and to explore cultural differences in QOL between English-and German-speaking countries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1310/sci2003-197

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People with spinal cord injury are at increased risk of depression and anxiety (experienced in around 22.2% of the population) and reduced quality of life.

    “People with SCI may experience many potential secondary physical and psychological consequences, including an increased risk of depression and anxiety (experienced in around 22.2% of the population [2]) and reduced quality of life (QoL [3]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lude, P., Kennedy, P., Elfström, M., & Ballert, C.
Affiliations
  • Stoke Mandeville Hospital (GB)
  • Mälardalen University (SE)
  • Swiss Paraplegic Research (CH)
Venue
Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
Published
2014-07
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
197-207
ISSN
1082-0744 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988314685
Cited by
68
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
spinal cord injury, quality of life, spinal cord injury rehabilitation, family caregivers, WHOQOL-BREF, physical health, psychological well-being, social adaptation, cultural differences, longitudinal change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review