Cited by 82Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and care

Internet-delivered mindfulness for people with depression and chronic pain following spinal cord injury: a randomized, controlled feasibility trial

Open access
Hearn, Jasmine Heath, Finlay, Katherine Anne·2018·Spinal Cord

Abstract

Study design Between-subjects, randomized controlled feasibility study.Objectives Populations with reduced sensory and motor function are at increased risk of depression, anxiety and pain, and may be less geographically mobile. This study explored the efficacy and feasibility of web-based mindfulness training for people with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting UK community sample.Methods Participants were randomly allocated to an 8-week online mindfulness intervention (N = 36), or to internet-delivered psychoeducation (N = 31). Depression symptom severity was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included anxiety, quality of life (QoL), pain perception, pain catastrophizing and mindfulness. Measures were taken before (T1), at completion of, (T2), and 3 months following the intervention (T3).Results At T2, ten participants discontinued mindfulness training, and five discontinued psychoeducation. Dropouts were of significantly older age. Nine participants were lost to follow-up. Mindfulness reduced depression significantly more than psychoeducation at T2 (mean difference = -1.50, 95% CI [-2.43, -0.58]) and T3 (mean difference = -2.34, 95% CI [-3.62, -1.10]). Anxiety, pain unpleasantness and catastrophizing were significantly reduced compared with psychoeducation. Total mindfulness scores, and all facets of mindfulness except observing were significantly higher following mindfulness training. At follow-up, reductions in anxiety and catastrophizing persisted.Conclusions Internet-delivered mindfulness training offers unique benefits and is viable for people with reduced sensory awareness. Future work should explore the feasibility of combined education and mindfulness training. The use of brief interventions shows promise in maximizing participant retention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41393-018-0090-2

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness is a stress-buffering strategy that can reduce psychological distress, depression, pain and worry associated with living with chronic illness.

    “Mindfulness has been implicated as a stress-buffering strategy which can reduce the psychological distress, depression, pain and worry associated with living with chronic illness [3–5].”

    From Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment (2021) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Effect of the intervention section (page unavailable) reports reduced depression, anxiety, pain unpleasantness and pain catastrophizing after mindfulness training in people with spinal cord injury. The paper does not establish mindfulness as a stress-buffering strategy or report a reduction in worry, and its trial findings do not extend to chronic illness generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study provided the best available evidence of benefits for depression, anxiety, pain-related outcomes and quality of life, supported by detailed statistical analyses showing significant results with medium to large effect sizes.

    “One study provided the best available evidence of benefits for depression, anxiety, pain-related outcomes and QoL, supported by detailed statistical analyses showing significant results with medium to large effect sizes [20].”

    From Mindfulness for pain, depression, anxiety, and quality of life in people with spinal cord injury: A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Effect of the intervention section reports statistically significant improvements in depression, anxiety, pain unpleasantness, and pain catastrophizing, with effect sizes and confidence intervals. It also reports no significant group differences in any quality-of-life domain at intervention completion. The paper does not establish that it provides the “best available” evidence; its explicit reference to medium-to-large effect sizes in the Discussion describes an earlier evaluation, not this trial. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness training for individuals with SCI may initiate cognitive reappraisal through increased present-moment awareness and acceptance of emotions, reduced experiential and behavioral avoidance, and less negative judgment, contributing to relieving depression and anxiety disorders.

    “Mindfulness training for individuals with SCI may initiate cognitive reappraisal through increased present-moment awareness and acceptance of emotions, reduced experiential and behavioral avoidance, and less negative judgment, contributing to relieving depression and anxiety disorders [20].”

    From Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Emerging studies applying MABIs among individuals with SCI suggest positive effectiveness on both psychological and physical health-related outcomes.

    “There are emerging studies applying MBAIs among individuals with SCI, suggesting positive effectiveness on both psychological (e.g., anxiety, depression, and stress) and physical (e.g., functional independence) health-related outcomes [15, 19, 20].”

    From Mindfulness- and acceptance-based interventions for people with spinal cord injury: a scoping review. (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Effect of the intervention section reports improvements in depression, anxiety, and pain unpleasantness among people with SCI receiving mindfulness training. This supports positive psychological and pain-related outcomes, but the paper does not establish the sentence’s examples of reduced stress or improved functional independence; its physical quality-of-life result was not significant. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All participants were wheelchair users, resident in the UK, and reported high levels of mindfulness above non-expert clinical populations on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.

    “All participants were wheelchair users, resident in the UK, and reported high levels of mindfulness above that of non-expert clinical populations on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (see Hearn & Finlay [4] for comparison).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]29. Simpson R, Booth J, Lawrence M, Byrne S, Mair F, Mercer S. Mindfulness based interventions in multiple sclerosis-a sys- tematic review. Bmc Neurol. 2014;14:15.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hearn, J. H., & Finlay, K. A.
Affiliations
University of Buckingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Hearn, Jasmine Heath
Venue
Spinal Cord
Published
2018-03-26
Volume
56
Issue
8
Pages
750-761
ISSN
  • 1362-4393 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5624
OpenAlex
W2790511170
Cited by
82
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Spinal Cord (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Buckingham E-Archive of Research (University of Buckingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
spinal cord injury, depression, chronic pain, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, quality of life, psychoeducation, feasibility, participant retention, online psychological intervention
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Spinal Cord Injuries, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Catastrophization, Pain Perception, Chronic Pain, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review