Cited by 60Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTechnology Use by Older AdultsDigital Accessibility for Disabilities

Barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia

Greig, Carole-Ann, Harper, Renée, Hirst, Tanya, Howe, Tami, Davidson, Bronwyn·2008·Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mobile phone use increases social participation. People with the communication disorder of aphasia are disadvantaged in the use of information and communication technology such as mobile phones and are reported to be more socially isolated than their peers. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health provides a framework to address the impact of environmental factors on individual participation. The aim of this preliminary study was to identify the barriers and facilitators to mobile phone use for people with aphasia. METHOD: A qualitative descriptive study involving two phases was conducted: (1) semi-structured interviews with 6 individuals with aphasia who owned or expressed a desire to own a mobile phone; (2) structured observations of key scenarios identified in the interviews of 3 participants who were sampled from the interview study. RESULTS: Results identified 18 barriers and 9 facilitators to mobile phone use. Key barriers and facilitators were identified in the areas of design and features, written support and training, and communicative partners. CONCLUSION: Mobile phone use can be problematic for people with aphasia. Intervention needs to address the barriers and utilise the facilitators to mobile phone use for this population. Further research is required to inform policy and intervention programs to ensure that people with aphasia have access to this technology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1310/tsr1504-307

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The variety of symptoms experienced by people with aphasia makes it difficult to interact with products and technologies such as mobile phones, creating a barrier to digital participation.

    “The variety of symptoms experienced by people with aphasia also makes it difficult to interact with products and technologies such as mobile phones, creating a barrier to digital participation (Greig et al., 2008;Brandenburg et al., 2013).”

    From Use and acceptance of voice assistants among people with aphasia in Germany (2023) · cites this paper as Greig et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greig, C.-A., Harper, R., Hirst, T., Howe, T., & Davidson, B.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Published
2008-07
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
307-324
ISSN
  • 1074-9357 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5119
OpenAlex
W2027388067
Cited by
60
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
Keywords
aphasia, mobile phone use, barriers and facilitators, assistive technology, social participation (health and rehabilitation), social isolation, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, technology design, communication disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aphasia, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Motor Skills, Qualitative Research, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review