Cited by 4Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Is More eHealth System Use Better for Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers? A Literature Review

Wu-Chen Su, Chih, Ming-Yuan·2016·Unpublished

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.13140/rg.2.1.4077.7200

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, W.-C., & Chih, M.-Y.
Venue
Unpublished
Publisher
Unpublished
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W2620736304
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2017: 3 · 2016: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
AMIA
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
e-health, cancer patients, family caregivers, digital health interventions, caregiver burden, health information use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review