Cited by 485Cancer survivorship and careHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityWomen's cancer prevention and management

Evaluation of an internet support group for women with primary breast cancer

Open access
Winzelberg, Andrew J., Classen, Catherine, Alpers, Georg W., Roberts, Heidi, Koopman, Cheryl, Adams, Robert E., Ernst, Heidemarie, Dev, Parvati +1 more·2003·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with breast carcinoma commonly experience psychologic distress following their diagnosis. Women who participate in breast cancer support groups have reported significant reduction in their psychologic distress and pain and improvement in the quality of their lives. Web‐based breast cancer social support groups are widely used, but little is known of their effectiveness. Preliminary evidence suggests that women benefit from their participation in web‐based support groups. METHODS: Seventy‐two women with primary breast carcinoma were assigned randomly to a 12‐week, web‐based, social support group (Bosom Buddies). The group was semistructured, moderated by a health care professional, and delivered in an asynchronous newsgroup format. RESULTS: The results indicate that a web‐based support group can be useful in reducing depression and cancer‐related trauma, as well as perceived stress, among women with primary breast carcinoma. The effect sizes ranged from 0.38 to 0.54. Participants perceived a variety of benefits and high satisfaction from their participation in the intervention CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that the web‐based program, Bosom Buddies, was effective in reducing participants' scores on depression, perceived stress, and cancer‐related trauma measures. The effect size of the intervention was in the moderate range. Although web‐based social support groups offer many advantages, this delivery mechanism presents a number of ethical issues that need to be addressed. Cancer 2003;97:1164–73. © 2003 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.11174

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.11174

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Irvine D, Brown B, Crooks D, Roberts J, Browne G. Psycho- social adjustment in women with breast cancer. Cancer. 1991;67:1097-1117.
  2. Cain EN, Kohorn EI, Quinlan DM, Latimer K, Schwartz PE. Psychosocial benefits of a cancer support group. Cancer. 1986;57:183-189.
  3. Fukui S, Kugaya A, Okamura H, et al. A psychosocial group intervention for Japanese women with primary breast car- cinoma. Cancer. 2000;89:1026 -1036.
  4. Spiegel D, Bloom J, Yalom ID. Group support for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981;38: 527-533.
  5. Edmonds CV, Lockwood GA, Cunningham AJ. Psychological response to long-term group therapy: a randomized trial with metastatic breast cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8:74 -91.
  6. McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, et al. CHESS (Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System): an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an underserved population. J Ambulatory Care Management. 1995;18:35-44.
  7. Gustafson DH, Hawkins R, Pingree S, et al. Effect of com- puter support on younger women with breast cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:435-445.
  8. King SA. Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts. Interpers Comput Technol Electron J 21st Century. 1994;2:47-56.
  9. Kreshka MA, Graddy K. One in eight: women speaking to women, a breast cancer workbook-journal. Grass Valley, CA: Sierra Nevada Cancer Center, 1997.
  10. Koopman C, Angell K, Kreshka MA, et al. Workbook-journal significantly reduces posttraumatic stress disorder symp- toms among rural women with primary breast cancer. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Psycho- logical Society, Adelaide, Australia, September 22-24, 2001.
  11. Gruber BL, Hersh SP, Hall NR, et al. Immunological re- sponses of breast cancer patients to behavioral interven- tions. Biofeedback Self Regul. 1993;18:1-22.
  12. Spiegel D, Morrow GW, Classen C, et al. Group psychother- apy for recently diagnosed breast cancer patients: a multi- center feasibility study. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8:482-493.
  13. Edelman S, Bell DR, Kidman AD. A group cognitive behav- iour therapy programme with metastatic breast cancer pa- tients. Psycho-Oncology. 1999;8:295-305.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Alpers, G. W., Roberts, H., Koopman, C., Adams, R. E., Ernst, H., Dev, P., & Taylor, C. B.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Winzelberg, Andrew J.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-02-20
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
1164-1173
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2035352836
Cited by
485
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 28
FWCI
8.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MADOC (University of Mannheim) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
breast cancer, online social support, psychological distress, depression, perceived stress, newsgroups, quality of life, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Self-Help Groups, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Patient Satisfaction, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review