Americanizing Canadian nursing: nursing regulation drift
Open accessAbstract
Recent regulatory changes mean Canadian nurses are writing a US-based entry to practice exam and a US company is assessing credentials of internationally educated nurses (IENs) for Canadian registration.This paper asserts that this policy direction has significant consequences for Canadian content and integrity of education programs, francophone parity in testing, and the future of primary health care and health system reform.Furthermore, writing a US exam means Canada is at risk of losing nursing human resources to the United States while trade agreements endanger Canadian nursing intellectual property.À la suite de changements de réglementation, les diplômés en science infirmière doivent passer un examen d'autorisation à pratiquer mis au point aux EU, et les diplômés internationaux en science infirmière sont évalués par une entreprise, elle aussi des États-Unis.Dans cet article, nous considérons que ces changements ont un impact significatif sur le contenu canadien et l'intégrité des programmes de formation, l'égalité de traitement dans l'évaluation pour les francophones et le futur des soins de santé primaire et la réforme des soins de santé.De plus, en uniformisant l'accréditation avec les EU, le Canada court le risque de laisser partir sa main d'oeuvre infirmière dans ce pays, au moment même où les accords commerciaux mettent en danger la propriété intellectuelle infirmière canadienne.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars.
“For example, the NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars [66,68,71–73,77,80,97,98,100,123,124,126,167,217]”
From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., Fineberg, H., Garcia, P., Ke, Y., Kelley, P., et al. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61854-5 · Cited by 5,960 · see citing works
Educational Levels of Hospital Nurses and Surgical Patient Mortality
Aiken, L. H. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.290.12.1617 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
(2018) · doi:10.1001/jama · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Aiken, L. H., Cimiotti, J. P., Sloane, D. M., Smith, H. L., Flynn, L. T., & Neff, D. F. (2011) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3182330b6e · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Nurse Workforce Challenges in the United States
Aiken, L. H., & Cheung, R. B. (2008) · OECD health working papers · doi:10.1787/236153608331 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
U.S. Nurse Labor Market Dynamics Are Key to Global Nurse Sufficiency
Aiken, L. H. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00714.x · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Republished: United States Registered Nurse Workforce Report Card and Shortage Forecast
Juraschek, S. P., Zhang, X., Ranganathan, V. K., & Lin, V. W.-H. (2019) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/1062860619873217 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Regulated Health Professions: Outcomes by Place of Birth and Training
Owusu, Y., & Sweetman, A. (2015) · Canadian Public Policy · doi:10.3138/cpp.2015-008 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Salfi, J., & Carbol, B. C. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · doi:10.1515/ijnes-2016-0078 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Cobbett, S., Nemeth, W. I., & MacDonald, J.-A. (2016) · Quality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1079 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Villeneuve MJ. 2017. Public policy and Canadian Nursing: lessons from the field. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duchscher, J. E. B., & Painter, S. (2021) · Advanced Emergency Nursing Journal · doi:10.1097/tme.0000000000000334 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review
Chiu, P., Thiessen, N. J., Idrees, S., Leslie, K., & Kung, J. Y. (2025) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0323716 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“For example, the NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars [66,68,71– 73, 77, 80, Nearly half of the scholarly sources (n = 87, 44.6”
InfluentialDuchscher, J. E. B., & Corneau, K. (2022) · Nursing Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1097/naq.0000000000000560 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
A comparative analysis of NCLEX pass rates: Nursing health human resources considerations
Hall, L. M., Lalonde, M., Visekruna, S., Chartrand, A., Reali, V., & Feather, J. (2019) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.12752 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Petrovic, K., Doyle, E. M., Lane, A., & Corcoran, L. (2019) · International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship · doi:10.1515/ijnes-2018-0052 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Singh‐Carlson, S., & May, K. A. (2019) · Journal of Professional Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.003 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Logue, N. C., & Gordon, R. (2018) · Quality Advancement in Nursing Education - Avancées en formation infirmière · doi:10.17483/2368-6669.1135 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Hall, L. M., & Lalonde, M. (2018) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.12444
- Authors
- Dalhousie University, MacMillan, K., Oulton, J., Bard, R., & Nicklin, W.
- Affiliations
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- ORCID
- MacMillan, Kathleen
- Venue
- Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé
- Published
- 2017-12-09
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 2291-6369 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2774605089
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 6.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
- Keywords
- nursing regulation, nursing education accreditation, primary care, health care reform, intellectual property, trade agreements, Canada–United States relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review