Cited by 8Nursing Education, Practice, and LeadershipOccupational and Professional Licensing RegulationGlobal Health Workforce Issues

Americanizing Canadian nursing: nursing regulation drift

Open access
Dalhousie University, MacMillan, Kathleen, Oulton, Judith, Bard, Rachel, Nicklin, Wendy·2017·Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé

Abstract

Recent regulatory changes mean Canadian nurses are writing a US-based entry to practice exam and a US company is assessing credentials of internationally educated nurses (IENs) for Canadian registration.This paper asserts that this policy direction has significant consequences for Canadian content and integrity of education programs, francophone parity in testing, and the future of primary health care and health system reform.Furthermore, writing a US exam means Canada is at risk of losing nursing human resources to the United States while trade agreements endanger Canadian nursing intellectual property.À la suite de changements de réglementation, les diplômés en science infirmière doivent passer un examen d'autorisation à pratiquer mis au point aux EU, et les diplômés internationaux en science infirmière sont évalués par une entreprise, elle aussi des États-Unis.Dans cet article, nous considérons que ces changements ont un impact significatif sur le contenu canadien et l'intégrité des programmes de formation, l'égalité de traitement dans l'évaluation pour les francophones et le futur des soins de santé primaire et la réforme des soins de santé.De plus, en uniformisant l'accréditation avec les EU, le Canada court le risque de laisser partir sa main d'oeuvre infirmière dans ce pays, au moment même où les accords commerciaux mettent en danger la propriété intellectuelle infirmière canadienne.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13162/hro-ors.v5i3.3154

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars.

    “For example, the NCLEX-RN entry-to-practice exam sparked controversy within the profession, generating significant attention from non-regulator scholars [66,68,71–73,77,80,97,98,100,123,124,126,167,217]”

    From Nursing regulation in Canada: Insights from a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Villeneuve MJ. 2017. Public policy and Canadian Nursing: lessons from the field. Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dalhousie University, MacMillan, K., Oulton, J., Bard, R., & Nicklin, W.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé
Published
2017-12-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
ISSN
2291-6369 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2774605089
Cited by
8
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
fr
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Health Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Occupational and Professional Licensing Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Global Health Workforce Issues
Keywords
nursing regulation, nursing education accreditation, primary care, health care reform, intellectual property, trade agreements, Canada–United States relations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review