Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Beyond technological determinism: revitalising labour process analyses of technology, capital and labour

Thompson, Paul, Laaser, Knut·2021·Work in the Global Economy
DOI 10.1332/273241721x16276384832119
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Technological determinism is a recurrent feature in debates concerning changes in economy and work and has resurfaced sharply in the discourse around the ‘fourth industrial revolution’. While a number of authors have, in recent years, critiqued the trend, this article is distinctive in arguing that foundational labour process analysis provides the most effective source of an alternative understanding of the relations between political economy, science, technology and work relations. The article refines and reframes this analysis, through an engagement with critical commentary and research, developing the idea of a political materialist approach that can reveal the various influences on, sources of contestation and levels of strategic choices that are open to economic actors. A distinction is made between ‘first order’ choices, often about adoption at aggregate level and ‘second order’ choices mainly concerned with complex issues of deployment. This framework is then applied to the analysis of case studies of the call centre labour process and digital labour platform, functioning as illustrative scenarios. It is argued that the nature of techno-economic systems in the ‘digital era’ open up greater opportunities for contestation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1332/273241721x16276384832119

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Adler, P.S. (2007) Marx, socialization and labour process theory: a rejoinder, Organization Studies, 28(9): 1387–94. doi: 10.1177/0170840607080748 · DOI
  2. Batt, R. (1999) Work organization, technology, and performance in customer service and sales, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52(4): 539–64. doi: 10.1177/001979399905200403 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Batt, R. and Holman, D. and Holtgrewe, U. (2009) The globalization of service work: comparative institutional perspectives on call centers, Introduction to a Special Issue of Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62(4): 453–88. doi: 10.1177/001979390906200401 · DOI
  4. Booth, A. (2004) Technical change in branch banking at the Midland Bank 1945–75, Accounting, Business & Financial History, 14(3): 277–300.
  5. Braverman, H. (1976) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth, New York: Monthly Review.
  6. Briken, K. and Taylor, P. (2018) Fulfilling the ‘British Way’: beyond constrained choice – Amazon workers’ lived experiences of workfare, Industrial Relations Journal, 48(5–6): 438–58. doi: 10.1111/irj.12232 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Callaghan, G. and Thompson, P. (2001) Edwards revisited: technical control in call centres, Economic and Industrial Democracy, 22(1): 13–37. doi: 10.1177/0143831X01221002 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Child, J. (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice, Sociology, 6(1): 1–22. doi: 10.1177/003803857200600101 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cooley, M. (1987) Architect or Bee? The Human Price of Technology, London: The Hogarth Press.
  10. Doellgast, V. (2008) Collective bargaining and high-involvement management in comparative perspective: Evidence from U.S. And German call centers, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 47(2): 284–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-232X.2008.00521.x. · DOI
  11. Edwards, P. and Ramirez, P. (2016) When should workers embrace or resist new technology?, New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2): 99–113. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12067 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Farrell, D. and Greig, F. (2016) Paychecks, Paydays, and the Online Platform Economy: Big Data on Income Volatility, New York: JPMorgan Chase & Co Institute, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2911293.
  13. Felstead, A. and Henseke, G. (2017) Assessing the growth of remote working and its consequences for effort, Well-being and Work-life balance, New Technology, Work and Employment, 32(3): 195–212. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12097 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Fligstein, N. and Shin, T.J. (2005) The shareholder value society: a review in changes in working conditions in the U.S., 1976–2000, in K. Neckerman (ed) Social Inequality, New York: Russell Sage.
  15. Frenkel, S., Korczynski, M., Shire, K. and Tam, M. (1999) On the Front Line: Organization of Work in the Information Economy, Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
  16. Gandini, A. (2019) Labour process theory and the gig economy, Human Relations, 72(6): 1039–56. doi: 10.1177/0018726718790002 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Gillespie, T. (2010) The politics of ‘platforms’, New Media & Society, 12(3): 347–64. doi: 10.1177/1461444809342738 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Glen, E. and Feldberg, R. (1980) Proletarianizing clerical work: technology and. organizational control in the office, in A. Zimbalist (ed) Case Studies of the Labor Process, New York: Monthly Review Press, pp 51–73.
  19. Gorz, A. (1976) Technology, technicians and class struggle, in A. Gorz (ed) The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class Struggle in Modern Capitalism, Brighton: The Harvester Press, pp 159–89.
  20. Greenbaum, J. (1976) Division of labor in the computer field, Monthly Review, 28(3): 40–55. doi: 10.14452/MR-028-03-1976-07_4 · DOI
  21. Hall, R. (2010) Renewing and revising the engagement between labour process theory and technology, in C. Smith and P. Thompson (eds) Working Life, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 159–81.
  22. Holtgrewe, U. (2014) New new technologies: the future and the present of work in information and communication technology, New Technology, Work and Employment, 1(29): 9–24. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12025 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Howcroft, D. and Bergvall-Kåreborn, B. (2019) A typology of crowdwork platforms, Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 21–38. doi: 10.1177/0950017018760136 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Howcroft, D. and Taylor, P. (2014) ‘Plus ca change, plus la meme chose?’ – researching and theorising the ‘new’ new technologies, New Technology, Work and Employment, 29(1): 1–8. doi: 10.1111/ntwe.12026 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Kenney, M. and Zysman, J. (2016) The rise of the platform economy, Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3): 61–9.
  26. Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1988) New Technology and the Labour Process, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  27. Korczynski, M. (2002) Human Resource Management in Service Work, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  28. Laaser, K. (2016) ‘If you are having a go at me, I am going to have a go at you’: the changing nature of social relationships of bank work under performance management, Work, Employment and Society, 30(6): 1000–16. doi: 10.1177/0950017015617686 · DOI
  29. Miozzo, M. and Ramirez, M. (2003) Services innovation and the transformation of work: the case of UK telecommunications, New Technology Work and Employment, 18(11): 63–80. doi: 10.1111/1468-005X.00111 · DOI
  30. Moore, P.V. and Joyce, S. (2020) Black box or hidden abode? The expansion and exposure of platform work managerialism, Review of International Political Economy, 27(4): 926–48. doi: 10.1080/09692290.2019.1627569 · DOI
  31. Noble, D.F. (1978) Social choice in machine design: the case of automatically controlled machine tools, and a challenge for labor, Politics & Society, 8(3–4): 313–47.
  32. Rosenberg, N. (1976) Marx as a student of technology, Monthly Review, July/August: 28(3): 56–77. doi: 10.14452/MR-028-03-1976-07_5 · DOI
  33. Schiller, D. (2014) Digital Depression: Information Technology and Economic Crisis, Chicago, IL: University Illinois Press.
  34. Spencer, D. (2017) Work in and beyond the second machine age: the politics of production and digital technologies, Work, Employment and Society, 31(1): 142–52. doi: 10.1177/0950017016645716 · DOI
  35. Srnicek, N. (2017) Platform Capitalism, London: Polity Press.
  36. Taylor, P. and Bain, P. (1999) ‘An assembly line in the head’: work and employee relations in the call centre, Industrial Relations Journal, 30(2): 101–17. doi: 10.1111/1468-2338.00113 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Taylor, P. and Bain, P. (2003) ‘Subterranean worksick blues’: humour as subversion in two call centres, Organization Studies, 24(9): 1487–509. doi: 10.1177/0170840603249008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Taylor, P. and Bain, P. (2005) ‘India calling to the far away towns’: the call centre labour process and globalization, Work, Employment and Society, 19(2): 261–82. doi: 10.1177/0950017005053170 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Thelen, K. (2018) Regulating Uber: the politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States, Perspectives on Politics, 16(4): 938–53. doi: 10.1017/S1537592718001081 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Thomas, R.J. (1994) What Machines Can’t Do: Politics and Technology in the Industrial, Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press.
  41. Thompson, P. (1990) Crawling from the wreckage: the labour process and the politics of production, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds) Labour Process Theory, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 95–124.
  42. Thompson, P. (2010) The capitalist labour process: concepts and connections, Capital & Class, 34(1): 7–14.
  43. Thompson, P. (2013) Financialization and the workplace: extending and applying the disconnected capitalism thesis, Work, Employment and Society, 27(3): 472–88. doi: 10.1177/0950017013479827 · DOI
  44. Thompson, P. (2020) Capitalism, technology and work: interrogating the tipping point thesis, The Political Quarterly, 91(2): 299–309. doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12787 · DOI
  45. Thompson, P. and Smith, C. (2009) Labour power and labour process: contesting the marginality of the sociology of work, Sociology, 43(5): 913–30. doi: 10.1177/0038038509340728 · DOI
  46. Thompson, P. and Smith, C. (2017) Capital and the labour process, I. Schmidt and C. Fanelli (eds) Reading ‘Capital’ Today, London: Pluto Press, pp 116–37.
  47. Vidal, M. (2020) Contradictions of the labour process, worker empowerment and capitalist inefficiency, Historical Materialism, 28(2): 170–204. doi: 10.1163/1569206X-00001792 · DOI
  48. Wajcman, J. (2017) Automation: is it really different this time?, British Journal of Sociology, 68(1): 119–27. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12239 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Williams, R. (2019) The social shaping of technology, in T. Pittinsky (ed) Science, Technology, and Society: New Perspectives and Directions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp 138–62.
  50. Wood, A., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. and Hjorth, I. (2019) Networked but commodified: the (dis)embeddedness of digital labour in the gig economy, Sociology, 53(5): 931–50. doi: 10.1177/0038038519828906 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Wood, A.J. (2020) Despotism on Demand: How Power Operates in the Flexible Workplace, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, P., & Laaser, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Stirling, UK
  • Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus–Senftenberg, Germany and University of Stirling, UK
Venue
Work in the Global Economy
Publisher
Bristol University Press
Published
2021-10
Volume
1
Issue
1-2
Pages
139-159
ISSN
2732-4176
DOI
10.1332/273241721x16276384832119
Cited by
44
References
4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.