Cited by 284Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesSocial Policy and Reform Studies

Health inequalities and welfare state regimes: theoretical insights on a public health ‘puzzle’: Table 1

Open access
Bambra, Clare·2011·Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Abstract

Welfare states are important determinants of health. Comparative social epidemiology has almost invariably concluded that population health is enhanced by the relatively generous and universal welfare provision of the Scandinavian countries. However, most international studies of socioeconomic inequalities in health have thrown up something of a public health 'puzzle' as the Scandinavian welfare states do not, as would generally be expected, have the smallest health inequalities. This essay outlines and interrogates this puzzle by drawing upon existing theories of health inequalities--artefact, selection, cultural--behavioural, materialist, psychosocial and life course--to generate some theoretical insights. It discusses the limits of these theories in respect to cross-national research; it questions the focus and normative paradigm underpinning contemporary comparative health inequalities research; and it considers the future of comparative social epidemiology.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jech.2011.136333

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variability between countries in age patterns might be explained by methodological and health-related factors, such as differences in the populations analyzed and reporting bias, differences in access to health care resources and treatments in the older population, and differences in welfare regimes and social protection policies.

    “Such variability between countries in the age patterns, might be explained by methodological and health-related factors, such as differences in the populations analized and reporting bias between countries, differences in the access to health care resources and treatments in older population, and differences in welfare regimes and social protection policies.”
  • Due to high differences between countries in these factors, the prevalence in the middle-age group might be higher in the UK than in southern or central European countries.

    “Due to the high differences between countries in these factors, the prevalence in the middle-age group might be higher in the UK than in southern or central European countries (Arias-de la Torre et al., 2019b;Bambra, 2011;Bambra and Eikemo, 2008;Reibling, 2010).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bambra C. Social inequalities in health: interrogating the Nordic welfare state "puzzle". In: Kvist J, Fritzell J, Hvinden B, et al, eds. Changing Equality: The Nordic Welfare Model in the 21st Century. Bristol: Policy Press, 2011.
  2. Diderichsen F. Impact of income maintenance policies. In: Mackenbach J, Bakker M, eds. Reducing Inequalities in Health: A European Perspective. London: Routledge, 2002:53e66.
  3. Stanistreet D, Bambra C, Scott-Samuel A. Is patriarchy the source of male mortality? J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:873e6.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bambra, C.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Bambra, Clare
Venue
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2011-06-20
Volume
65
Issue
9
Pages
740-745
ISSN
  • 0141-7681 (ISSN-L)
  • 0143-005X
  • 1470-2738
OpenAlex
W2110599657
Cited by
284
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
University of St Andrews
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
Keywords
health disparities, welfare regimes, Nordic welfare states, socioeconomic inequalities in health, selection theory, cultural theory, behavioral theory, materialist theory, psychosocial theory, life course perspective, cross-country analysis
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Humans, Male, Political Systems, Scandinavian and Nordic Countries, Social Class, Social Welfare, Sociology, Medical, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review