Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inappropriate Prescribing Predicts Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults

Lund, B. C., Carnahan, R. M., Egge, J. A., Chrischilles, E. A., Kaboli, P. J.·2010·Annals of Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Explicit measures of potentially inappropriate prescribing, such as the Beers criteria, have been associated with risk for adverse drug events (ADEs). However, no such link has been established for actual inappropriate prescribing using implicit measures. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether an implicit measure of inappropriate prescribing can predict ADE risk. METHODS: Patients were veterans aged 65 years and older who were seen in primary care clinics and participated in a randomized controlled trial of a pharmacist-physician collaborative intervention. Inappropriate prescribing was determined at baseline, using the 2003 Beers criteria as an explicit measure and the Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) as an implicit measure. A modified MAI scoring approach was designed to target ADE risk and was used in addition to standard scoring. ADEs that occurred during the 3 months following baseline were assessed by patient interview and plausibility verification by blinded pharmacist review. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether inappropriate prescribing predicted risk for an ADE, controlling for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Of 236 patients, 34 (14.4%) experienced an ADE. Inappropriate prescribing was common at baseline, with 48.7% of patients receiving a Beers criteria drug and 98.7% of patients having an inappropriate rating on at least 1 MAI criterion. Modified MAI scoring, but not other measures of inappropriate prescribing, significantly predicted ADE risk. For every unit increase in modified MAI score (3.1 +/- 3.5; mean +/- SD), the adjusted 3-month odds of an ADE increased 13% (OR 1.13; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26). For example, patients with a modified MAI score of 3, near the precise mean score of 3.1, were at a nearly 40% greater risk for an ADE compared with patients with a score of zero. CONCLUSIONS: Implicit measurement of actual inappropriate prescribing predicted ADE risk, an important clinical outcome. This finding helps confirm the validity of prior studies that have relied on explicit measures to link potentially inappropriate prescribing to adverse health outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1345/aph.1m657

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Lund, B. C., Carnahan, R. M., Egge, J. A., Chrischilles, E. A., & Kaboli, P. J.
Venue
Annals of Pharmacotherapy
Published
2010-05-11
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
957-963
ISSN
  • 0012-6578 (ISSN-L)
  • 1060-0280
  • 1542-6270
OpenAlex
W2143189399
Cited by
194
References
2
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inappropriate Prescribing Predicts Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1345/aph.1m657
The paper
Lund, B. C., Carnahan, R. M., Egge, J. A., Chrischilles, E. A., & Kaboli, P. J. (2010). Inappropriate Prescribing Predicts Adverse Drug Events in Older Adults. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1m657

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.