The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti‐bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools
Abstract
Background. The positive results of the Norwegian anti‐bullying programme (Olweus, 1992) stimulated other countries to tackle bully/victim problems. However, outcome studies found rather low levels of effect or even inconsistent results. Aims. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate behavioural effectiveness of a school‐based anti‐bullying approach within Flemish schools. In addition, specific attention was given to the relationship between outcome findings and external support. Sample. A total of 18 schools, comprising 1104 primary and secondary school children were recruited for this study. Students ranged in age from 10 to 16 years. Method. For this study, an experimental pre‐test/post‐test design was used which included a control group. Three groups were established. The first group, Treatment with Support, involved students from schools that implemented a school‐based anti‐bullying intervention with additional support from the research group. The second group, Treatment without Support, also involved students from schools that implemented a school‐based anti‐bullying programme. However, in contrast with those falling under the first condition, this group of schools could not appeal to the research group for additional help. The last group involved students from schools that did not implement the anti‐bullying programme and served as a Control condition. Repeated measures analyses of variance were carried out. Results. The findings regarding the effects of the school‐based anti‐bullying intervention programme on the extent of bullying and victimisation showed a mixed pattern of positive changes in primary schools and zero outcomes in secondary schools. The findings regarding the effects of external support revealed limited outcomes. Conclusions. The outcomes of the evaluation study confirm that a schoolbased anti‐bullying intervention strategy can be effective in reducing problems with bullying, especially within primary schools. It was argued that the developmental characteristics of secondary school students interfered with the outcomes. In addition, the findings revealed no extra effects of training sessions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review
Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-010-9109-1 · Cited by 1,624
Langford, R., Bonell, C. P., Jones, H. E., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S. M., Waters, E., Komro, K. A., Gibbs, L. F., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008958.pub2 · Cited by 768
Langford, R., Bonell, C., Jones, H., Pouliou, T., Murphy, S., Waters, E., Komro, K., Gibbs, L., Magnus, D., & Campbell, R. (2015) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1360-y · Cited by 578
“Twenty-nine studies were conducted in North America (27 USA [22,23,25-27,29,35,37,39,40,45,48,50-52,57-63,65, 66,70,75,83], 2 in Canada [71,82]), 19 in Europe [19-21,24,30, 32,33,36,41,42,44,47,53,74,76-78,85], 11 in Australasia [28,31,34,46,54,64,68,69,72,73,81] and eight in middleor low-income countries (China [56,7…”
BackgroundThe Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267 · Cited by 561
Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.001 · Cited by 518
Metadata
- Authors
- Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Van Oost, P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Educational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 195-210
- ISSN
- 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8279
- OpenAlex
- W2001776096
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti‐bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000709900158056
- The paper
- Stevens, V., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., & Van Oost, P. (2000). Bullying in Flemish schools: An evaluation of anti‐bullying intervention in primary and secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709900158056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.