Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 561

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research

Smith, J. David, Schneider, Barry H., Smith, Peter K., Ananiadou, Katerina·2004·School Psychology Review

Abstract

Bullying is a serious problem in schools, and school authorities need effective solutions to resolve this problem. There is growing interest in the whole-school approach to bullying. Whole-school programs have multiple components that operate simultaneously at different levels in the school community. This article synthesizes the existing evaluation research on whole-school programs to determine the overall effectiveness of this approach. The majority of programs evaluated to date have yielded nonsignificant outcomes on measures of self-reported victimization and bullying, and only a small number have yielded positive outcomes. On the whole, programs in which implementation was systematically monitored tended to be more effective than programs without any monitoring.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ciucci E., 1998, Psichiatria dell'infanzia e dell'adolescenza, 65, 147
  2. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power for behavioural sciences, 21, 22
  3. Farrington D., 1993, Crime and justice: A review of research, 17, 381
  4. Fernández I., 2001, Prevención de la violencia y resolucón de conflictos: El clima escolar como factor de cualidad.
  5. Hanewinkel R., 1997, Mobbing: Gewaltpraevention in schulen in Schleswig-Holstein.
  6. Melton G. B., 1998, Violence among rural youth: Final report to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
  7. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(2000)26:1<113::AID-AB9>3.0.CO;2-E · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(2000)26:1<113::aid-ab9>3.0.co;2-e
  8. 10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360 · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360 · Paper page
  9. Rahey L., 2002, Canadian Journal of Counselling, 36, 281
  10. Schneider B. H., 1993, Exceptionality Education Canada, 3, 195

Cited by

See all 561

Metadata

Authors
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K.
Venue
School Psychology Review
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
547-560
ISSN
  • 0279-6015 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-966X
OpenAlex
W2165407260
Cited by
561
References
36
FWCI
10.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267
The paper
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The Effectiveness of Whole-School Antibullying Programs: A Synthesis of Evaluation Research. School Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.