The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A factor‐analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement
Open accessAbstract
Evidence supporting the application of Brown's (1991, 1993) conception of behavioural addiction to computing behaviour is presented. Questionnaire items tapping Brown's addiction criteria were factor‐analysed along with others, including computer apathy—engagement and computer anxiety—comfort items of Charlton and Birkett (1995). Items relating to some of Brown's criteria (tolerance, euphoria, and cognitive salience) were found to be complex, an Addiction factor loading upon them but an Engagement factor loading more highly. Items tapping other criteria (conflict, withdrawal, behavioural salience, and relapse and reinstatement) were shown to be factor pure, with only the addiction factor loading highly upon them. It is concluded that Brown's conception of behavioural addiction can be applied to computer‐related behaviour, although the relationship of milder facets of addiction, which are also merely indicative of high engagement, to computer‐related addictions is non‐unique. It is also concluded that classifying individuals as exhibiting pathological computer use using checklists based upon adaptations of DSM criteria for pathological gambling is likely to overestimate the number of people addicted to computing activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.53.9.1017 · Cited by 4,793
Psychology of Computer Use: XL. Addictive Use of the Internet: A Case That Breaks the Stereotype
Young, K. S. (1996) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1996.79.3.899 · Cited by 1,108
Cited by
What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology
O'Brien, H. L., & Toms, E. G. (2008) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20801 · Cited by 1,397
Pathological Video Game Use Among Youths: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study
Gentile, D. A., Choo, H., Liau, A., Sim, T., Li, D., Fung, D., & Khoo, A. (2011) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2010-1353 · Cited by 1,314
Internet Gaming Addiction: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2012) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-011-9318-5 · Cited by 1,113
Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing
Charlton, J. P., & Danforth, I. D. W. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002 · Cited by 946
Self-citationThe benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites
Turel, O., & Serenko, A. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.1 · Cited by 684
Metadata
- Authors
- Charlton, J. P.
- Venue
- British Journal of Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 329-344
- ISSN
- 0007-1269 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8295
- OpenAlex
- W1974952842
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A factor‐analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/000712602760146242
- The paper
- Charlton, J. P. (2002). A factor‐analytic investigation of computer ‘addiction’ and engagement. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712602760146242
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.