Cited by 946Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing

Open access
Charlton, John P., Danforth, Ian D.W.·2007·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some authors have reported that gamers who do not exhibit evidence of other psychopathology or functional impairment may endorse items intended to parallel substance addiction, challenging their diagnostic utility.

    “Some authors have reported that gamers who do not exhibit evidence of other psychopathology or functional impairment may endorse such items intended to parallel substance addiction 174-176 , thus challenging their diagnostic utility 172 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [175]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes high engagement as non-pathological and without negative consequences, while reporting that some addiction-criterion items can indicate high engagement. The Conclusions (page unavailable) warn that mistaking those indicators for addiction can overestimate pathological game playing. The paper does not establish that the gamers endorsing such items lacked other psychopathology; the citing sentence also attaches its diagnostic-utility conclusion to a different reference. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Charlton, J. P., & Danforth, I. D. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Greater Manchester (GB)
  • Whitman College (US)
Corresponding author
Charlton, John P.
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
1531-1548
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124553691
Cited by
946
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 69 · 2016: 71 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 54
FWCI
32.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • UBIR (University of Greater Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
behavioral addiction, massively multiplayer online games, gaming addiction, player engagement, addiction diagnosis, gaming time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review