CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 114Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The effectiveness of computerized cognitive behavioural therapy in routine care

Open access
Cavanagh, K., Shapiro, D. A., Van den Berg, S., Swain, S., Barkham, M., Proudfoot, J.·2006·British Journal of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1348/014466505x84782
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objectives and design The efficacy of a Computerized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CCBT) package, Beating the Blues , has been demonstrated in a large randomized controlled trial. The current study tests the generalizability of this finding in a naturalistic non‐randomized trial. Method 219 patients with anxiety and/or depression were recruited to receive CCBT in routine care. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation‐Outcome Measure (CORE‐OM) and Work and Social Adjustment scale (WSA) were administered pre‐treatment, immediately on completing treatment and at 6 months post‐treatment. Single‐item self‐report measures of anxiety and depression were also collected during each treatment session. Results Completer and intention‐to‐treat analysis demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvements on the CORE‐OM, WSA and in self‐reported anxiety and depression. Intention‐to‐treat analysis indicated an average 0.29‐point drop on the CORE‐OM, equating to an uncontrolled pre‐post effect size of 0.50. Research completers achieved an average 0.61‐point drop equating to an uncontrolled pre‐post size of 1.00 on the same measure. Where data was available (18%), these benefits were maintained at week 32 (6 months follow‐up). Conclusion CCBT can be an effective first line tool within a stepped care framework for the management of common mental health problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466505x84782

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Aubrey R., 2003, Early non‐attendance as a predictor of continued non‐attendance and subsequent attrition from psychological help, Clinical Psychology, 32, 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–114 of 114

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cavanagh, K., Shapiro, D. A., Van den Berg, S., Swain, S., Barkham, M., & Proudfoot, J.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Cavanagh, K.
ORCID
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
499-514
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
DOI
10.1348/014466505x84782
OpenAlex
W2061383680
Semantic Scholar
5f08375b634ea5a803467d9a70abb93cb196a8de
Cited by
113
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 1514 d)
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
anxiety, depression, common mental disorders, stepped care, usual care, generalizability, treatment effectiveness, work and social adjustment, CORE-OM
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Periodicity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Adjustment, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Workplace, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review