The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Well‐being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace
Abstract
Over the last 40 years, major changes have taken place in the workplace. The growth in the use of information technology at work, the globalization of many industries, organizational restructuring, changes in work contracts and worktime scheduling have radically transformed the nature of work in many organizations. The workforce itself is also diversifying, with an increase in female participation, a growing number of dual‐earner couples and older workers. The present paper discusses the impact of these workplace transitions on employee well‐being. We focus on four issues that are current concerns for organizations and the workforce; job insecurity, work hours, control at work, and managerial style. For each topic, recent research is presented, with suggestions for future research and recommendations for practitioners working in the organizations of today. The paper concludes with some final considerations for researchers and practitioners that may benefit both employee well‐being and organizational effectiveness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 2×
“both objective and subjective measures) are also important when assessing work control (Jick, 1979).”
BackgroundMethodAn empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. managers.
Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.65 · Cited by 2,154
Baltes, B. B., Briggs, T. E., Huff, J. W., Wright, J. A., & Neuman, G. A. (1999) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.4.496 · Cited by 837
(1997) · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00656.x · Cited by 722
Self-citation
Cited by
Lee, A. R., Son, S.-M., & Kim, K. K. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.011 · Cited by 814
LePine, J. A., LePine, M. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.883 · Cited by 799
Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: a conceptual integration and extension
Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2007) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.424 · Cited by 594
Liu, J., Siu, O., & Shi, K. (2010) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00407.x · Cited by 435
Employability and Employees’ Well‐Being: Mediation by Job Insecurity 1
Cuyper, N. D., Bernhard‐Oettel, C., Berntson, E., Witte, H. D., & Alarco, B. (2008) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00332.x · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-11
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 489-509
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2037725833
- Cited by
- 682
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Well‐being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317901167497
- The paper
- Sparks, K., Faragher, B., & Cooper, C. L. (2001). Well‐being and occupational health in the 21st century workplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
