The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity
Abstract
Organizations frequently downsize in the hopes of creating a ‘lean and mean’ company able to be flexible and quick to adapt to changing environmental needs. The purpose of the current research was to assess the effects of job insecurity on productivity, counterproductivity, and creativity in a simulated organizational environment and a field setting. In the first study, 104 non‐traditional undergraduate students ( M = 30.48 years) participated in a laboratory experiment that manipulated the threat of lay‐offs (job insecurity) and measured creativity and productivity over two time periods. Compared to control group participants, results indicate that participant productivity increased in the condition of higher levels of job insecurity, whereas creative problem solving decreased. In the second study, 144 employees in five organizations completed a survey measuring their job insecurity perceptions, enactment of counterproductive work behaviours, and creative problem‐solving ability. Regression analyses indicate that job insecurity predicted lower creativity scores, yet was also related to lower numbers of counterproductive work behaviours. Taken together, these studies suggest that job insecurity may have adverse effects on creativity, yet moderately beneficial effects on productivity. Results are interpreted in light of the increasing prevalence of job insecurity and organizational downsizing in today's workplace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The associative basis of the creative process.
Mednick, S. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048850 · Cited by 4,140
Duncker, K. (1945) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093599 · Cited by 2,938
The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410409534549 · Cited by 1,132
Incubation of creative performance and specific associative priming.
Mednick, M. T., Mednick, S. A., & Mednick, E. V. (1964) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045994 · Cited by 164
Cited by
HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review
Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017) · Personnel Review · doi:10.1108/pr-09-2016-0257 · Cited by 430
Cognitive and Affective Job Insecurity: A Meta-Analysis and a Primary Study
Jiang, L., & Lavaysse, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318773853 · Cited by 422
De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/caim.12079 · Cited by 379
A meta‐analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation‐related behaviour
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2013) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12031 · Cited by 301
Technology usage, expected job sustainability, and perceived job insecurity
Nam, T. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.08.017 · Cited by 282
Metadata
- Authors
- Probst, T. M., Stewart, S. M., Gruys, M. L., & Tierney, B. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 479-497
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2128587850
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 4.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317906x159103
- The paper
- Probst, T. M., Stewart, S. M., Gruys, M. L., & Tierney, B. W. (2007). Productivity, counterproductivity and creativity: The ups and downs of job insecurity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906x159103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.