Cited by 25Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Therapist characteristics predict discrete trial teaching procedural fidelity

Open access
Peters-Scheffer, Nienke, Didden, Robert, Korzilius, Hubert, Sturmey, Peter·2013·Intellectual and developmental disabilities

Abstract

Early intensive behavioral intervention is generally effective for children with autism spectrum disorder but is associated with variability in treatment outcome and quality of treatment delivery may contribute to this. This study examined the relationship between therapist personality, attitude toward individuals with a disability, and perceived relationship between therapist and child on procedural fidelity. Discrete Trial Teaching (DTT) was provided at a preschool for children with intellectual disabilities. Seventy DTT sessions between 22 therapists and 35 children were videotaped and analyzed. Data on therapist's attitude toward individuals with a disability, therapist's personality traits, and perceived relationship between therapist and child were also collected. Procedural fidelity was high and significantly related to therapist's attitude toward individuals with a disability, therapist's openness to experience, and perceived relationship between therapist and child. Therapists with high procedural fidelity tended to have a more positive attitude toward individuals with disabilities on the cognitive dimension, a more negative attitude toward individuals with disabilities on the affect dimension, lower levels of openness to experience, and perceived the relationship between themselves and the child as less positive.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1352/1934-9556-51.4.263

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Peters-Scheffer, N., Didden, R., Korzilius, H., & Sturmey, P.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Queens University of Charlotte (US)
Venue
Intellectual and developmental disabilities
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
263-272
ISSN
  • 1934-9491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1934-9556
OpenAlex
W2104809204
Cited by
25
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Intellectual and developmental disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Radboud Universiteit
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
discrete trial teaching, procedural fidelity, therapist characteristics, therapist personality, openness to experience, attitudes toward disability, therapist-child relationship, early intensive behavioral intervention, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, preschool children, treatment quality
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attitude of Health Personnel, Behavior Therapy, Character, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Intellectual Disability, Middle Aged, Professional-Patient Relations, Teaching, Early Intervention, Educational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review