The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Archaeology for the Seventh Generation
Abstract
Angela Cavender Wilson's 2004 essay "Reclaiming Our Humanity: Decolonization and the Recovery of Indigenous Knowledge" provides a useful starting point for considering the role of decolonization in both the academy and in our everyday lives.1 Wilson, as an Indigenous scholar, muses, "For what had I been continually seeking an education if not to transform the world around me and create a place where justice for Indigenous people is more than an illusion?"2 For Wilson, the writings of Frantz Fanon and Paulo Freire concerning respectively decolonization and praxis provided, as she says, "the language to articulate [her] own struggle."3 Decolonization as Wilson applies it refers to the process of reversing the colonial structures inherent in both the institutions of colonialism and in the minds of the colonized. In relation to the decolonization of Indigenous peoples, Wilson stresses that Indigenous communities must return to their traditions, reassert these traditional cultural and social values and worldviews into their everyday lives, and begin to rebuild their communities accordingly. But it is through praxis, theoretically informed action, that people are able to decolonize themselves and the structures around them. The concept of praxis situates the power of people, as thinking and knowing individuals, to reflect upon their lives and change them through their actions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Community-based participatory research models can minimize power differences between researchers and Indigenous partners by incorporating Indigenous goals and values as well as their epistemologies and ontologies into the development, execution, and interpretation of research.
“As many of the case studies show, community-based participatory research models can minimize power differences between researchers and Indigenous partners by incorporating Indigenous goals and values as well as their epistemologies and ontologies into the development, execution, and interpretation of research (Gonzalez et al. 2006:404;Smith and Waterton 2009).”
From Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America (2022) · cites this paper as Gonzalez et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
Connerton, P. (1989) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511628061 · Cited by 6,086
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, C., Ferguson, T. J., Lippert, D., McGuire, R. H., Nicholas, G. P., Watkins, J. E., & Zimmerman, L. J. (2010) · American Antiquity · doi:10.7183/0002-7316.75.2.228 · Cited by 170
Collaborative Archaeologies and Descendant Communities
Colwell, C. (2016) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095937 · Cited by 178
“The Future of Archaeology Is Antiracist”: Archaeology in the Time of Black Lives Matter
Flewellen, A. O., Dunnavant, J. P., Odewale, A., Jones, A., Wolde-Michael, T., Crossland, Z., & Franklin, M. (2021) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2021.18 · Cited by 151
Archaeology and Social Justice in Native America
Laluk, N. C., Montgomery, L. M., Tsosie, R., McCleave, C., Miron, R., Carroll, S. R., Aguilar, J., Thompson, A. B. W., Nelson, P., Sunseri, J., et al. (2022) · American Antiquity · doi:10.1017/aaq.2022.59 · Cited by 59
Self-citationRoos, C. I., Laluk, N. C., Reitze, W., & Davis, O. K. (2023) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1017/qua.2022.61 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez, S. L., Modzelewski, D., Panich, L. M., & Schneider, T. D.
- Venue
- The American Indian Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 388-415
- ISSN
- 1534-1828
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review