The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Africa Has Never Been “Traditional”: So Can We Make a General Case? A Response to the Articles
Abstract
Marginal Gains (2204) has been described as a surprising and bold book. Since the articles in this collection, which take one or other of its arguments as points of departure, share certain similar qualities, they can be treated as a collective effort initiating new debate with non-African economic research and thinking. This article reviews the argument of the book, highlights the concept and phenomenon of ordinal ranking in both the book and the articles, and then uses the findings to begin an appreciative critique of the ideas of Michel Callon. Although Callon's approach intersects with that of Marginal Gains in many ways, the scalar ranking of people, and the use of rank to exclude and divert, finds more prominence in the book's approach, which also has more relevance for Europe than economists seem to have acknowledged so far. The article ends with a new instance of ordinal ranking, from Cameroon.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While the social status of exotic commodities such as glass beads was acknowledged as such, to the extent that individuals made trips to the coast, their value and significance was marginal and situational (Berry 2007;Guyer 2007).”
From New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe (2020) · cites this paper as Guyer 2007
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0125 · DOI
- Maurer, 2005, Mutual Life, Limited: Islamic Banking, Alternative Currencies, Lateral Thinking
- Hibou, 2004, Privatizing the State
- Davidson, 1992, The Black Man's Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation State
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0092 · DOI
- 10.1177/0308275X9801800201 · DOI
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0082 · DOI · Paper page
- Servet, 2005, Autour d'un livre: Marginal Gains, Politique Africaine, 99, 155
- 10.1080/03085140220123126 · DOI
- Guyer, 2004, Marginal Gains: Monetary Transactions in Atlantic Africa
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0122 · DOI
- 10.2307/524941 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0109 · DOI
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0124 · DOI
- Ferguson, 1999, Expectations of Modernity: Myths and Meanings of Urban Life on the Zambian Copperbelt
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0094 · DOI
- Kriger, 1999, Pride of Men: Ironworking in Nineteenth Century West-Central Africa
- Haugerud, 2005, Book Review, Marginal Gains. American Ethnologist, 32
- Tapscott, 2006, Portfolio
- Eglash, 2000, African Fractals: Modern Computing and Indigenous Design
- Coussy, 2005, Autour d'un Livre: Marginal Gains, Politique Africaine, 99, 157
- Piot, 2007, Border Practices: Playing the US Diversity Lottery
- Callon, 2005, Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence, Economic Sociology. European Electronic Newsletter, 6, 3
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0077 · DOI
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0079 · DOI
- Giddens, 1994, Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order, 56
- 10.1215/9780822387640 · DOI
- Callon, Economy of Qualities, Researchers in the Wild and the Rise of Technical
- Ralph, 2005, Review of Margin Gains, Africa Development, 30, 251
- 10.1353/arw.2007.0094 · DOI
- Latour, 1993, We Have Never Been Modern
- Hart, 2000, The Memory Bank. Money in an Unequal World
Cited by
Sorted by citations
New Perspectives on the Political Economy of Great Zimbabwe
Chirikure, S. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-019-09133-w · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Guyer, J. I.
- Venue
- African Studies Review
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-202
- ISSN
- 0002-0206
- 1555-2462
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review