Finding Common Ground
Abstract
Abstract: This article assesses a collaborative digital storytelling project between Chief Leschi Schools, a Puyallup Tribal K-12 school, and University of Washington students, teachers, and institutional leaders. This assessment emphasizes the importance of and examines how to build trust and facilitate co-planning in digital storytelling workshops centering Indigenous voices. Collaboration between Indigenous and non-indigenous students and teachers offered unconventional learning experiences and community celebrations of Indigenous youth. Inductive, qualitative research drawing from personal memos, interviews, focus groups, and surveys revealed the significance of co-planning and trust-building between participants of distinct social and formal education backgrounds. This analysis showcases how these different factors shaped and sustained the project, resulting in what the authors hope will be an enduring commitment. Recommendations include: (1) Emphasis on consistent and ongoing participation to cultivate trust and facilitate continuous communication; (2) purposeful engagement of students’ fundamental skills, presenting digital narratives that align with their interests and competencies; and (3) adopting an approach for non-indigenous academics and academic institutions of prioritizing and actively engaging in collaborative partnerships with Indigenous communities. The article underscores the significance of recognizing and resolving complex power and cultural dynamics between universities and tribes for successful project co-planning and implementation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Hiserman, L., Thompson, K., Rose, J., Dudoward (Tsimshian), J., McCloud (Puyallup), B., Brouillet, M., Duenas (Puyallup, B., Lorton (Quinault), C., Warren, J., & Christie, P.
- Venue
- Collaborative Anthropologies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 32-74
- ISSN
- 1943-2550 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-4009
- OpenAlex
- W4402333384
- Semantic Scholar
- 60f2f6663a92c3f2ee2c7e8d9ba438703718f100
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Collaborative anthropologies (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Digital Storytelling and Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Keywords
- digital storytelling, indigenous education, collaborative planning, trust building, Indigenous youth, power relations, cultural dynamics, collaborative partnerships, indigenous voices, K-12 schools
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review