The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks
Open accessAbstract
In this article, we use newly developed statistical methods to examine the generative processes that give rise to widespread patterns in friendship networks. The methods incorporate both traditional demographic measures on individuals (age, sex, and race) and network measures for structural processes operating on individual, dyadic, and triadic levels. We apply the methods to adolescent friendship networks in 59 U.S. schools from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health (Add Health). We model friendship formation as a selection process constrained by individuals’ sociality (propensity to make friends), selective mixing in dyads (friendships within race, grade, or sex categories are differentially likely relative to cross-category friendships), and closure in triads (a friend’s friends are more likely to become friends), given local population composition. Blacks are generally the most cohesive racial category, although when whites are in the minority, they display stronger selective mixing than do blacks when blacks are in the minority. Hispanics exhibit disassortative selective mixing under certain circumstances; in other cases, they exhibit assortative mixing but lack the higher-order cohesion common in other groups. Grade levels are always highly cohesive, while females form triangles more than males. We conclude with a discussion of how network analysis may contribute to our understanding of sociodemographic structure and the processes that create it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Suicide and Friendships Among American Adolescents
Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J. (2004) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.1.89 · Cited by 760
Cited by
A Survey of Statistical Network Models
Goldenberg, A., Zheng, A. X., Fienberg, S. E., & Airoldi, E. M. (2010) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000005 · Cited by 819
The Corner and the Crew: The Influence of Geography and Social Networks on Gang Violence
Papachristos, A. V., Hureau, D. M., & Braga, A. A. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413486800 · Cited by 432
Specification of Exponential-Family Random Graph Models: Terms and Computational Aspects
Morris, M., Handcock, M. S., & Hunter, D. R. (2008) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v024.i04 · Cited by 406
Self-citationThe Creation of Social Value: Can An Online Health Community Reduce Rural–Urban Health Disparities?1
Goh, J. M., Gao, G. (., & Agarwal, R. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.1.11 · Cited by 346
Complex Systems Research in Educational Psychology: Aligning Theory and Method
Hilpert, J. C., & Marchand, G. C. (2018) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1469411 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2009-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-125
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2122885846
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/dem.0.0045
- The paper
- Goodreau, S. M., Kitts, J. A., & Morris, M. (2009). Birds of a feather, or friend of a friend? using exponential random graph models to investigate adolescent social networks. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0045
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.