Cited by 760Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child AbuseGun Ownership and Violence Research

Suicide and Friendships Among American Adolescents

Open access
Bearman, Peter S., Moody, James·2004·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. We investigated the relationship between friendships and suicidality among male and female adolescents. Methods. We analyzed friendship data on 13 465 adolescents from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health to explore the relationship between friendship and suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. We controlled for known factors associated with suicidality. Results. Having had a friend who committed suicide increased the likelihood of suicidal ideation and attempts for both boys and girls. Socially isolated females were more likely to have suicidal thoughts, as were females whose friends were not friends with each other. Among adolescents thinking about suicide, suicide attempts appear largely stochastic, with few consistent risk factors between boys and girls. Conclusions. The friendship environment affects suicidality for both boys and girls. Female adolescents’ suicidal thoughts are significantly increased by social isolation and friendship patterns in which friends were not friends with each other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.94.1.89

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents may be particularly susceptible to socialization of self-injury when a close friend endorses depressive symptoms, NSSI, or suicidal ideation and behavior.

    “adolescents may be particularly susceptible toward the socialization of self-injury when a close friend endorses depressive symptoms, NSSI, or suicidal ideation and behavior (Bearman & Moody 2004, Kandel et al. 1991, Rew et al. 2001, Yoder 1999)”

    From Adolescent Suicide as a Failure of Acute Stress-Response Systems. (2019) · cites this paper as Bearman & Moody 2004

    The Results (page unavailable in our copy) associate a friend's suicide attempt with adolescents' own suicidal thoughts and attempts, supporting the suicidal-behavior portion of the claim. The paper does not establish socialization as the mechanism or address a friend's depressive symptoms, NSSI, or suicidal ideation. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Networks appear to have gendered effects, with girls being most at risk of suicidality when they have exceedingly small social networks or are immersed in exceedingly large ones.

    “Likewise, networks appear to have gendered effects, with girls being most at risk of suicidality when they have exceedingly small social networks or are immersed in exceedingly large ones (Bearman and Moody, 2004).”

    From The Social Roots of Suicide: Theorizing How the External Social World Matters to Suicide and Suicide Prevention (2021) · cites this paper as Bearman and Moody, 2004

    The Results report that social isolation increased girls’ odds of suicidal ideation and that network effects differed by gender. They also link risk to intransitive friendships, not exceedingly large networks; dense school networks were associated with lower risk for girls. The cited passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Of the 49 highest-rigor studies on R/S and suicide, 39 (80%) reported less suicide, fewer attempts, or more negative attitudes toward suicide among more R/S, and two (4%) found positive relationships.

    “With regard to the 49 studies with the highest methodological rigor, 39 (80%) reported less suicide, fewer suicide attempts, or more negative attitudes toward suicide among the more R/S [155–170] and two (4%) found positive relationships (one study in Delhi, India [171], and one in college students distressed over R/S concerns [172]).”

    From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [164]

    The Methods (page unavailable) describe this paper’s measure of religious-service attendance, and the Results (page unavailable) report associations with adolescent suicidal ideation and attempts. Neither section assesses 49 high-rigor studies or reports the claimed 39-study and two-study counts; searches for the religion-related findings did not locate those figures. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In girls, a large, fragmented network consisting of friends who were not friends with each other further increased risk of depression because the care of maintaining such networks involved even more work.

    “In girls, a large, fragmented network consisting of friends who were not friends with each other further increased risk of depression because the care of maintaining such networks involved even more work (Bearman and Moody, 2004).”

    From Social functioning in major depressive disorder (2016) · cites this paper as Bearman and Moody, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [20]Bradford S, Urquhart C. The making and breaking of young men: suicide and the adolescent male. Youth Policy. 1998;61:28–41. [Google Scholar]
  2. [24]Durkheim E. Suicide. New York: Free Press; 1951.
  3. [27]Moody J. The Structure of Adolescent Social Relations: Modeling Friendship in Dynamic Social Settings. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press; 1999.
  4. [30]Honaker J, Joseph A, King G, Scheve K, Singh N. Amelia: A Program for Missing Data. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bearman, P. S., & Moody, J.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2004-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
89-95
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1970545454
Cited by
760
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 73 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 35
FWCI
15.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
Keywords
adolescent suicide, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, friendship, peer relationships, social isolation, gender differences, suicide bereavement
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Role, Self Concept, Social Support, Suicide, Suicide, Attempted, United States, Logistic Models, Friends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review