The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sex differences in morbidity and mortality
Open accessAbstract
Women have worse self-rated health and more hospitalization episodes than men from early adolescence to late middle age, but are less likely to die at each age. We use 14 years ofdata from the u.s. National Health Interview Survey to examine this paradox. Our results indicate that the difference in self-assessed health between women and men can be entirely explained by differences in the distribution ofthe chronic conditions they face. This is not true, however, for hospital episodes and mortality. Men with several smoking-related conditions-including cardiovascular disease and certain lung disorders-are more likely to experience hospital episodes and to die than women who suffer from the same chronic conditions, implying that men may experience more-severe forms of these conditions. While some of the difference in mortality can be explained by differences in the distribution of chronic conditions, an equally large share can be attributed to the larger adverse effects of these conditions on male mortality. The greater effects ofsmoking-related conditions on men’s health may be due to their higher rates ofsmoking throughout their lives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories
Wilson, P. W. F., D’Agostino, R. B., Levy, D., Belanger, A. M., Silbershatz, H., & Kannel, W. B. (1998) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.18.1837 · Cited by 9,581
Illness and the feminine role: a theoretical review
Nathanson, C. A. (1975) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/0037-7856(75)90094-3 · Cited by 509
Sex matters: secular and geographical trends in sex differences in coronary heart disease mortality
Lawlor, D. A., Ebrahim, S., & Smith, G. D. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7312.541 · Cited by 213
Cited by
True health vs response styles: exploring cross‐country differences in self‐reported health
Jürges, H. (2007) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.1134 · Cited by 555
Increasing ambient temperature reduces emotional well-being
Noelke, C., McGovern, M., Corsi, D. J., Jimenez, M. P., Stern, A., Wing, I. S., & Berkman, L. (2016) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.045 · Cited by 247
The Effects of Two Influential Early Childhood Interventions on Health and Healthy Behaviour
Conti, G., Heckman, J. J., & Pinto, R. (2016) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12420 · Cited by 213
Gender roles and traits in stress and health
Mayor, E. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00779 · Cited by 201
Sex and age differences in COVID-19 mortality in Europe
Ahrenfeldt, L. J., Otavova, M., Christensen, K., & Lindahl-Jacobsen, R. (2021) · Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1007/s00508-020-01793-9 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Case, A., & Paxson, C.
- Venue
- Demography
- Publisher
- Duke University Press
- Published
- 2005-05-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 189-214
- ISSN
- 0070-3370 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-7790
- OpenAlex
- W2891169577
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/dem.2005.0011
- The paper
- Case, A., & Paxson, C. (2005). Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2005.0011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.