Philosophical Epistemology in Irenaeus
Abstract
Abstract: Scholars have largely neglected Irenaeus’s philosophical psychology and related sub–fields, including his philosophical epistemology. This study argues that Irenaeus in fact implemented philosophical epistemology throughout his writings. To demonstrate this thesis, the article first introduces two approaches to epistemology that were current in Irenaeus’s era. The first approach is intellect–based epistemology ( noēsis ), which held that truth is attainable by means of the mind’s contemplation of intelligible realities. The second approach is sense–based epistemology ( aisthēsis ), which held that the human being can attain knowledge through a complex process. In this process the soul’s sense–perceptive faculty acquires data through the fleshly organs of sense perception. This data is stored as memory within the soul and subsequently sorted and analyzed in successive phases of pre–rationale and rationale analysis, which yield knowledge. Having outlined these ancient approaches to epistemology the article examines potential evidence of both in Irenaeus’s extant writings. It finds that there is little reason to conclude that Irenaeus accepted noetic epistemology. However, there is plentiful evidence to corroborate the thesis that Irenaeus accepted a form of sense–based epistemology, which he deploys in relatively sophisticated and complex arguments at multiple points throughout his corpus.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- McCashen, G.
- Corresponding author
- McCashen, Grayden
- ORCID
- McCashen, Grayden
- Venue
- Journal of Early Christian Studies
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-87
- ISSN
- 1067-6341 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3184
- OpenAlex
- W4408687170
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of early Christian studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Augustinian Studies and Theology
- Keywords
- Irenaeus, epistemology, philosophical psychology, noesis, aisthesis, ancient epistemology, early Christian philosophy, memory, sensory perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review