Cited by 779Economic Theory and PolicyLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityHistorical Economic and Social Studies

“The Decline of the U.S. Labor Share”

Open access
Elsby, Michael W. L., Hobijn, Bart, Şahin, Ayşegül·2013·Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Abstract

Over the past quarter century, labor’s share of income in the United States has trended downward, reaching its lowest level in the postwar period after the Great Recession. A detailed examination of the magnitude, determinants, and implications of this decline delivers five conclusions. First, about a third of the decline in the published labor share appears to be an artifact of statistical procedures used to impute the labor income of the self-employed that underlies the headline measure. Second, movements in labor’s share are not solely a feature of recent U.S. history: The relative stability of the aggregate labor share prior to the 1980s in fact veiled substantial, though offsetting, movements in labor shares within industries. By contrast, the recent decline has been dominated by the trade and manufacturing sectors. Third, U.S. data provide limited support for neoclassical explanations based on the substitution of capital for (unskilled) labor to exploit technical change embodied in new capital goods. Fourth, prima facie evidence for institutional explanations based on the decline in unionization is inconclusive. Finally, our analysis identifies offshoring of the labor-intensive component of the U.S. supply chain as a leading potential explanation of the decline in the U.S. labor share over the past 25 years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/eca.2013.0016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The macro-level stability of labor's share disguised a lot of instability at the industry level.

    “The macro-level stability of labor's share was always, as Keynes remarked,”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin, 2013

  • The offshoring of labor-intensive components of U.S. manufacturing may have contributed to the falling domestic labor share during the 1990s and 2000s.

    “They conclude that the offshoring of labor-intensive components of U.S. manufacturing may have contributed to the falling domestic labor share during the 1990s and 2000s.”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin (2013)

  • Using the Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin approach, the paper replicates the finding of a negative association between rising imports and falling labor share.

    “Using their approach, we are able to replicate the finding of a negative association between rising imports and falling labor share.”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin (2013)

  • Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin (2013) find a negative industry-level association between the change in the labor share and growth of total import intensity.

    “Using data from both manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries, Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin (2013) find a negative industry-level association between the change in the labor share and growth of total import intensity.”

    From The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms* (2020) · cites this paper as Elsby, Hobijn and Sahin (2013)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Antras, Pol. 2004. "Is the U.S. Aggregate Production Function Cobb-Douglas? New Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution." B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics 4, no. 1. Autor, David H., David Dorn, and Gordon H. Hanson. 2013. "The China Syn- drome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States." American Economic Review 103, no. 6, 2121-68.
  2. Autor, David H., Lawrence F. Katz, and Melissa S. Kearney. 2008. "Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Revising the Revisionists." Review of Economics and Statis- tics 90, no. 2: 300-23.
  3. Basu, Susanto, John G. Fernald, and Miles S. Kimball. 2006. "Are Technology Improvements Contractionary?" American Economic Review 96: 1418-48.
  4. Böckerman, Petri, and Mika Maliranta. 2011. "Globalization, Creative Destruc- tion, and Labour Share Change: Evidence on the Determinants and Mechanisms from Longitudinal Plant-Level Data." Oxford Economic Papers 64: 259-80.
  5. Bound, John, and George Johnson. 1992. "Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980s: An Evaluation of Alternative Explanations." American Economic Review 82, no. 3: 371-92.
  6. Chirinko, Robert S. 2008. "The Long and Short of It." Journal of Macroeconomics 30, no. 2: 671-86.
  7. Feenstra, Robert C., and Gordon H. Hanson. 1996a. "Globalization, Outsourcing, and Wage Inequality." American Economic Review 86, no. 2: 240-45.
  8. ---. 1996b. "Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wages." In The Political Economy of Trade Policy: Papers in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati, edited by Robert C. Feenstra, Gene M. Grossman, and Douglas A. Irwin. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  9. ---. 1999. "The Impact of Outsourcing and High Technology Capital on Wages: Estimates for the United States, 1979-1990." Quarterly Journal of Eco- nomics 114, no. 3: 907-40.
  10. Fernald, John G. 2012. "A Quarterly, Utilization-Adjusted Series on Total Fac- tor Productivity." Working Paper no. 2012-19. San Francisco: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
  11. Galí, Jordi, and Mark Gertler. 1999. "Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Economet- ric Analysis." Journal of Monetary Economics 44, no. 2: 195-222.
  12. Gallaway, Lowell E. 1964. "The Theory of Relative Shares." Quarterly Journal of Economics 78, no. 4: 574-91.
  13. Gollin, Douglas. 2002. "Getting Income Shares Right." Journal of Political Econ- omy 110, no. 2: 458-74.
  14. Grant, Arthur. 1963. "Issues in Distribution Theory: The Measurement of Labor's Relative Share, 1899-1929." Review of Economics and Statistics 45, no. 3: 273-79.
  15. Greenwood, Jeremy, Zvi Hercowitz, and Per Krusell. 1997. "Long-Run Impli- cations of Investment-Specific Technological Change." American Economic Review 87, no. 3: 342-62.
  16. Griliches, Zvi. 1969. "Capital-Skill Complementarity." Review of Economics and Statistics 51, no. 4: 465-68.
  17. ---, and David A. Macpherson. 2003. "Union Membership and Coverage Database from the Current Population Survey: Note." Industrial and Labor Relations Review 56, no. 2: 349-54. [Data available at www.unionstats.com, last accessed 09/06/2013].
  18. Hummels, David, Jun Ishii, and Kei-Mu Yi. 2001. "The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade." Journal of International Economics 54, no. 1: 75-96.
  19. Hurst, Erik, Geng Li, and Benjamin Pugsley. 2010. "Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms: Evidence from Income Underreporting of the Self-Employed." Work- ing Paper no. 16527. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research. International Labour Organization. 2013. Global Wage Report 2012/13: Wages and Equitable Growth. Geneva: International Labour Office.
  20. Johns, Andrew, and Joel Slemrod. 2010. "The Distribution of Income Tax Non- compliance." National Tax Journal 63: 397-418.
  21. Jorgenson, Dale W. 1963. "Capital Theory and Investment Behavior." American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings) 53, no. 2: 247-59.
  22. Kaldor, Nicholas. 1957. "A Model of Economic Growth." Economic Journal 67, no. 268: 591-624.
  23. ---. 1961. "Capital Accumulation and Economic Growth." In Theory of Capital, edited by F. A. Lutz and D.C. Hague. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  24. Karabarbounis, Loukas, and Brent Neiman. 2013. "The Global Decline of the Labor Share." Quarterly Journal of Economics, October 24 (online).
  25. Katz, Lawrence F., and Kevin M. Murphy. 1992. "Changes in Relative Wages, 1963-1987: Supply and Demand Factors." Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, no. 1: 35-78.
  26. Keynes, John M. 1939. "Relative Movements of Real Wages and Output." Eco- nomic Journal 49: 34-51.
  27. King, Robert G., and Mark W. Watson. 2012. "Inflation and Unit Labor Cost." Journal of Money Credit and Banking 44s (December): 111-49.
  28. Kravis, Irving B. 1959. "Relative Income Shares in Fact and Theory." American Economic Review 49, no. 5: 917-49.
  29. Krueger, Alan B. 1999. "Measuring Labor's Share." American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 89, no. 2: 45-51.
  30. Mehran, Hamid, and Joseph Tracy. 2001. "The Effect of Employee Stock Options on the Evolution of Compensation in the 1990s." FRBNY Economic Policy Review 7, no. 3: 17-34.
  31. Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. 2003. "Income Inequality in the United States: 1913-1998." Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 1: 1-39.
  32. Sbordone, Argia M. 2002. "Prices and Unit Labor Costs: A New Test of Price Stickiness." Journal of Monetary Economics 49, no. 2: 265-92.
  33. Solow, Robert M. 1958. "A Skeptical Note on the Constancy of Relative Shares." American Economic Review 48, no. 4: 618-31.
  34. Yi, Kei-Mu. 2003. "Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?" Journal of Political Economy 111, no. 1: 52-102.
  35. Jones, Charles I. 2005. "The Shape of Production Functions and the Direction of Technical Change." Quarterly Journal of Economics 120, no. 2 (May): 517-49.
  36. McCartin, Joseph A. 2011. Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, the Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike That Changed America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elsby, M. W. L., Hobijn, B., & Şahin, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Federal Reserve (US)
Venue
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2013-09
Volume
2013
Issue
2
Pages
1-63
ISSN
  • 0007-2303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4465
OpenAlex
W2104890410
Cited by
779
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 78 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
90.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
Keywords
wage share, declining labor share, trade sector, manufacturing industry, capital-labor substitution, technological change, union decline, offshoring, Great Recession, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review