Cited by 390Economic Theory and PolicyEconomic Growth and ProductivityIncome, Poverty, and Inequality

Deciphering the Fall and Rise in the Net Capital Share: Accumulation or Scarcity?

Open access
Rognlie, Matthew·2016·Brookings Papers on Economic Activity

Abstract

In the postwar era, developed economies have experienced two substantial trends in the net capital share of aggregate income: a rise during the last several decades, which is well known, and a fall of comparable magnitude that continued until the 1970s, which is less well known. Overall, the net capital share has increased since 1948, but once disaggregated this increase turns out to come entirely from the housing sector: the contribution to net capital income from all other sectors has been zero or slightly negative, as the fall and rise have offset each other. Several influential accounts of the recent rise emphasize the role of increased capital accumulation, but this view is at odds with theory and evidence: it requires empirically improbable elasticities of substitution, and it presumes a correlation between the capital-income ratio and capital share that is not visible in the data. A more limited narrative that stresses scarcity and the increased cost of housing better fits the data. These results are clarified using a new, multisector model of factor shares.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/eca.2016.0002

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rognlie, M.
Corresponding author
Rognlie, Matthew
Venue
Brookings Papers on Economic Activity
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2016-03
Volume
2015
Issue
1
Pages
1-69
ISSN
  • 0007-2303 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4465
OpenAlex
W2303461539
Cited by
390
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
110.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economic Theory and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Keywords
capital income, housing industry, capital accumulation, capital scarcity, factor shares, elasticity of substitution, multi-sector model, developed countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review