The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making College Worth It: A Review of the Returns to Higher Education
Abstract
Despite a general rise in the return to college, likely due to technological change, the cost-benefit calculus facing prospective students can make the decision to invest in and attend college dauntingly complex. Philip Oreopoulos and Uros Petronijevic review research on the varying costs and benefits of higher education and explore in full the complexity of the decision to invest in and attend college. Optimal college attainment decisions are different for all prospective students, who diverge in terms of what they are likely to get out of higher education and what specific options might be best for them. Earnings of college graduates depend in important measure on the program of study and eventual occupation they choose. Students uninterested in or unable to complete a four-year college degree appear to benefit from completing a two-year degree. Prospective students may also face both financial constraints, which prohibit them from taking advantage of more education, and information problems and behavioral idiosyncrasies, such as reluctance to take on debt, which keep them from making optimal decisions about attending college. In their discussion of how student debt figures in the college investment, the authors note that some students borrow too little and, as a result, underinvest in their education. Carefully calculating the return on the college investment can help determine the “appropriate” amount of debt. Students are more likely to benefit from postsecondary education the more informed they are about the expenses associated with college and the potential options for financial aid, which can be extremely complex. To make the best college investment, Oreopoulos and Petronijevic stress, prospective students must give careful consideration to selecting the institution itself, the major to follow, and the eventual occupation to pursue. For any particular program at a particular school, anticipated future labor market earnings, the likelihood of completion, the costs, and the value of any student debt must all be factored into the assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of The Economics of Education
(2011) · Handbook of the Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-19772-6 · Cited by 2,525
The Race between Education and Technology
(2010) · The Race between Education and Technology · doi:10.2307/j.ctvjf9x5x.11 · Cited by 1,634
Academically Adrift: Limited Learning on College Campuses
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011) · Cited by 1,457
Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling
Card, D. (1993) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w4483 · Cited by 1,052
Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935089 · Cited by 995
Priceless: The Nonpecuniary Benefits of Schooling
Oreopoulos, P., & Salvanes, K. G. (2011) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.25.1.159 · Cited by 963
Self-citationSocial and Economic Returns to College Education in the United States
Hout, M. (2012) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102503 · Cited by 943
Labor-Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College
Kane, T. J., & Rouse, C. E. (1995) · American Economic Review · Cited by 726
Estimating Marginal Returns to Education
Carneiro, P., Heckman, J. J., & Vytlacil, E. J. (2011) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.101.6.2754 · Cited by 612
The Effect of Attending the Flagship State University on Earnings: A Discontinuity-Based Approach
Hoekstra, M. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.717 · Cited by 588
Cited by
Goldrick-Rab, S., Kelchen, R., Harris, D. N., & Benson, J. (2016) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/685442 · Cited by 299
University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E. M., & Hotz, V. J. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20130626 · Cited by 198
Field of Study in College and Lifetime Earnings in the United States
Kim, C., Tamborini, C. R., & Sakamoto, A. (2015) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040715602132 · Cited by 162
The Long-Run Impacts of Financial Aid: Evidence from California’s Cal Grant
Bettinger, E., Gurantz, O., Kawano, L., Sacerdote, B., & Stevens, M. (2019) · American Economic Journal: Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20170466 · Cited by 110
Behavioral Economics of Education
Lavecchia, A. M., Liu, H., & Oreopoulos, P. (2016) · Handbook of the Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63459-7.00001-4 · Cited by 89
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U.
- Venue
- The Future of Children
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 41-65
- ISSN
- 1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-1558
- OpenAlex
- W2132089123
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 98.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making College Worth It: A Review of the Returns to Higher Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/foc.2013.0001
- The paper
- Oreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U. (2013). Making College Worth It: A Review of the Returns to Higher Education. The Future of Children. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.