CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 198Higher Education Research StudiesCareer Development and DiversitySchool Choice and Performance

University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California

Open access
Arcidiacono, Peter, Aucejo, Esteban M., Hotz, V. Joseph·2016·American Economic Review
DOI 10.1257/aer.20130626PMC PMC6675032
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We examine differences in minority science graduation rates among University of California campuses when racial preferences were in place. Less prepared minorities at higher ranked campuses had lower persistence rates in science and took longer to graduate. We estimate a model of students' college major choice where net returns of a science major differ across campuses and student preparation. We find less prepared minority students at top ranked campuses would have higher science graduation rates had they attended lower ranked campuses. Better matching of science students to universities by preparation and providing information about students' prospects in different major-university combinations could increase minority science graduation. (JEL D14, E23, E32, E43, E52, E61, E62)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1257/aer.20130626

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins.

    “increased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins”

    From Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209 (2021) · cites this paper as Arcidiacono, Aucejo, and Hotz, 2016

    The Conclusion reports lower science graduation rates for less-prepared students at more selective UC campuses. But it also finds that more selective campuses have an advantage in graduating better-prepared science students, so the claim is too broad when applied to students generally. The supplied passages do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Altonji Joseph G., Blom Erica, and Meghir Costas. 2012 “ Heterogeneity in Human Capital Investments: High School Curriculum, College Major, and Careers.” Annual Review of Economics 4: 185– 223.
  2. Antonovics Kate, and Backes Ben. 2014a “ The Effect of Banning Affirmative Action on College Admissions Policies and Student Quality.” Journal of Human Resources 49 (2): 295– 322.
  3. Antonovics Kate, and Backes Ben. 2014b “ The Effect of Banning Affirmative Action on Human Capital Accumulation Prior to College Entry.” IZA Journal of Labor Economics 3 (5).
  4. Antonovics Kate L., and Sander Richard H. 2013 “ Affirmative Action Bans and the Chilling Effect.” American Law and Economics Review 15 (1): 252– 99.
  5. Arcidiacono Peter. 2004 “ Ability Sorting and the Returns to College Major.” Journal of Econometrics 121 (1–2): 343– 75.
  6. Arcidiacono Peter, Aucejo Esteban M., Fang Hanming, and Spenner Kenneth I. 2011 “ Does Affirmative Action Lead to Mismatch? A New Test and Evidence.” Quantitative Economics 2 (3): 303– 33.
  7. Arcidiacono Peter, Aucejo Esteban M., and Hotz V. Joseph. 2016 “ University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California: Dataset.” American Economic Review. 10.1257/aer.20130626. PMC6675032 31371833
  8. Arcidiacono Peter, Aucejo Esteban M., and Spenner Ken. 2012 “ What Happens after Enrollment? An Analysis of the Time Path of Racial Differences in GPA and Major Choice.” IZA Journal of Labor Economics 1 (5): doi: 10.1186/2193-8997-1-5. · DOI
  9. Arcidiacono Peter, Hotz V. Joseph, and Kang Songman. 2012 “ Modeling College Major Choices Using Elicited Measures of Expectations and Counterfactuals.” Journal of Econometrics 166 (1): 3– 16.
  10. Arcidiacono Peter, Khan Shakeeb, and Vigdor Jacob L. 2011 “ Representation versus Assimilation: How Do Preferences in College Admissions Affect Social Interactions?” Journal of Public Economics 95 (1–2): 1– 15.
  11. Arcidiacono Peter, and Lovenheim Michael. Forthcoming. “ Affirmative Action and the Quality-Fit Tradeoff.” Journal of Economic Literature.
  12. Bettinger Eric P., Terry Long Bridget, Oreopoulos Philip, and Sanbonmatsu Lisa. 2012 “ The Role of Application Assistance and Information in College Decisions: Results from the H&R Block FAFSA Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 127 (3): 1205– 42.
  13. Conley John P., and Önder Ali Sina. 2014 “ The Research Productivity of New PhDs in Economics: The Surprisingly High Non-Success of the Successful.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (3): 205– 16.
  14. Cunha Flavio, Heckman James J., Lochner Lance, and Masterov Dimitriy V. 2006 “ Interpreting the Evidence on Life Cycle Skill Formation” In Handbooks of the Economics of Education, Vol. 1, edited by Hanushek Eric and Welch Finis, 697– 812. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  15. Dale Stacy Berg, and Krueger Alan B. 2002 “ Estimating the Payoff to Attending a More Selective College: An Application of Selection on Observables and Unobservables.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1491– 1527.
  16. Dale Stacy B., and Krueger Alan B. 2014 “ Estimating the Effects of College Characteristics over the Career Using Administrative Earnings Data.” Journal of Human Resources 49 (2): 323– 58.
  17. Gemici Ahu, and Wiswall Matthew. 2014 “ Evolution of Gender Differences in Post-Secondary Human Capital Investments: College Majors.” International Economic Review 55 (1): 23– 56.
  18. Griffith Amanda L. 2010 “ Persistence of Women and Minorities in STEM Field Majors: Is It the School that Matters?” Economics of Education Review 29 (6): 911– 22.
  19. Hoxby Caroline M. 2009 “ The Changing Selectivity of American Colleges.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 23 (4): 95– 118.
  20. Hoxby Caroline M., and Turner Sarah. 2015 “ What High-Achieving Low-Income Students Know about College.” American Economic Review 105 (5): 514– 17.
  21. Kinsler Josh, and Pavan Ronni. Forthcoming. “ The Specificity of General Human Capital: Evidence from College Major Choice.” Journal of Labor Economics.
  22. Luppino Marc, and Sander Richard. 2015 “ College Major Peer Effects and Attrition from the Sciences.” IZA Journal of Labor Economics 4 (4).
  23. Melguizo Tatiana, and Wolniak Gregory C. 2012 “ The Earnings Benefits of Majoring in STEM Fields Among High Achieving Minority Students.” Research in Higher Education 53 (4): 383– 405.
  24. National Research Council. 2013 “ Monitoring Progress Toward Successful K-12 STEM Education: A Nation Advancing?” Committee on the Evaluation Framework for Successful K-12 STEM Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academics Press.
  25. Oreopoulos Philip, and Petronijevic Uros. 2013 “ Making College Worth It: A Review of the Returns to Higher Education.” Future of Children 23 (1): 41– 65. 25522645
  26. Pallais Amanda. 2015 “ Small Differences that Matter: Mistakes in Applying to College.” Journal of Labor Economics 33 (2): 493– 520.
  27. Seymour Elaine, and Hewitt Nancy M. 2000 Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  28. Sjoquist David L., and Winters John V. 2014 “ State Merit-Based Financial Aid Programs and College Attainment.” Journal of Regional Science 55 (3): 364– 90.
  29. Smyth Frederick L., and McArdle John J. 2004 “ Ethnic and Gender Differences in Science Graduation at Selective Colleges with Implications for Admission Policy and College Choice.” Research in Higher Education 45 (4): 353– 81.
  30. Stange Kevin. 2015 “ Differential Pricing in Undergraduate Education: Effects on Degree Production by Field.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 34 (1): 107– 35.
  31. Stinebrickner Ralph, and Stinebrickner Todd R. 2014 “ A Major in Science? Initial Beliefs and Final Outcomes for College Major and Dropout.” Review of Economic Studies 81 (1): 426– 72.
  32. US News & World Report. 1996 “ Best National Universities, 1997.” US News & World Report 121 (11): 110– 13.
  33. Wiswall Matthew, and Zafar Basit. 2015 “ Determinants of College Major Choice: Identification Using an Information Experiment.” Review of Economic Studies 82 (2): 791– 824.
  34. Zafar Basit. 2013 “ College Major Choice and the Gender Gap.” Journal of Human Resources 48 (3): 545– 95.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E. M., & Hotz, V. J.
Affiliations
  • National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
Hotz, V. Joseph
ORCID
Venue
American Economic Review
Publisher
American Economic Association
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
106
Issue
3
Pages
525-562
ISSN
0002-8282 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1257/aer.20130626
PMC
PMC6675032
OpenAlex
W3023939415
Cited by
198
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
FWCI
76.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/M010341/1)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD065563)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
minority students, racial preferences, college major choice, university rankings, student preparation, University of California, university admission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review