Cited by 41Electronic Health Records SystemsMedical Coding and Health InformationPublic Health and Social Inequalities

Using health information technology to bring social determinants of health into primary care: a conceptual framework to guide research

Open access
Cottrell, Erika K., Gold, Rachel, Likumahuwa, Sonja, Angier, Heather, Huguet, Nathalie, Cohen, Deborah J., Clark, Khaya D., Gottlieb, Laura M. +1 more·2018·Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Abstract

Several recent national initiatives have called for increased efforts to integrate social determinants of health (SDH) into health care settings using health information technology (HIT). However, there is limited evidence to guide the implementation of these recommendations in practice. Research is needed to understand what SDH information is most important to collect, how SDH information can be used to inform clinical care and referrals, and ultimately, whether and how integrating SDH screening and action into primary care affects individual and population health. We recently proposed a conceptual framework to illustrate how HIT can be used to bring SDH information into primary care. In this paper, we describe how we are putting this conceptual model into practice within the OCHIN network of community health centers by highlighting examples of ongoing research, identifying knowledge gaps, and outlining a roadmap of future research to move the field forward.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/hpu.2018.0071

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The literature on social risk factor documentation is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.

    “But this literature is hampered by a lack of data about the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations being studied.[6][7][8][9]”

    From Structured and unstructured social risk factor documentation in the electronic health record underestimates patients’ self-reported risks (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) says evidence is limited on how to implement social-determinants screening in primary care. The OCHIN research-portfolio section (page unavailable) discusses collecting patient-reported data, but neither passage says that documentation research is hampered by a lack of data on the true prevalence of social risks in the clinical populations studied. Searches for prevalence and that specific data gap found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [2]McGinnis JM, Williams-Russo P, Knickman JR. The case for more active policy attention to health promotion. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr; 21(2): 78– 93. 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78 11900188 · DOI
  2. [3]Institute of Medicine of the National Academies Committee on the recommended social and behavioral domains and measures for electronic health records. Capturing social and behavioral domains in Electronic Health Records: phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2014. 24757748
  3. [8]DeVoe JE, Bazemore AW, Cottrell EK, Perpsectives in primary care: a conceptual framework and a path for integrating social determinants of health into primary care practice. Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 14(2): 104– 8. 10.1370/afm.1903 26951584 PMC4781512 · DOI
  4. [9]Garg A, Jack B, Zuckerman B. Addressing the social determinants of health within the patient-centered medical home: lessons learned from pediatrics. JAMA. 2013 5 15; 309(19): 2001– 2. 10.1001/jama.2013.1471 23619825 · DOI
  5. [10]Kaufman A Theory vs. practice: should primary care practice take on social determinants of health now? yes. Ann Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 14(2): 100– 1. 10.1370/afm.1915 26951582 PMC4781510 · DOI
  6. [12]Gottlieb LM, Ackerman S, Wing H, Evaluation Activities and Influences at the Intersection of Medical and Social Services. JHCPU. 2017 8 3; 28(3): e162521 10.1353/hpu.2017.0089 28804070 · DOI
  7. [13]Gottlieb LM, Tirozzi KJ, Manchanda R, Moving electronic medical records upstream: incorporating social determinants of health. Am J Prev Med. 2015 2; 48(2): 215– 8. 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.07.009 25217095 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [15]Matthews KA, Adler NE, Forrest CB, Collecting psychosocial “vital signs” in electronic health records: why now? what are they? what’s new for psychology? Am Psychol. 2016 9; 71(6): 497– 504. 10.1037/a0040317 27571529 · DOI
  9. [17]DeVoe JE, Gold R, Spofford M, Developing a network of community health centers with a common electronic health record: description of the safety net west practice-based research network (SNW-PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Sep-Oct; 24(5): 597– 604. 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.110052 21900444 PMC3525325 · DOI
  10. [18]DeVoe JE, Likumahuwa S, Eiff MP, Lessons learned and challenges ahead: report from the OCHIN Safety Net West practice-based research network (PBRN). J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Sep-Oct; 25(5): 560– 4. 10.3122/jabfm.2012.05.120141 22956690 PMC3582650 · DOI
  11. [19]DeVoe JE, Sears A. The OCHIN community information network: bringing together community health centers, information technology, and data to support a patient-centered medical village. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun; 26(3): 271– 8. 10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120234 23657695 PMC3883432 · DOI
  12. [20]Likumahuwa S, Song H, Singal R, Building research infrastructure in community health centers: a Community Health Applied Research Network (CHARN) report. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct; 26(5): 579– 87. 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130025 24004710 PMC4559143 · DOI
  13. [21]DeVoe JE, Gold R, Cottrell E, The ADVANCE network: accelerating data value across a national community health center network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4): 591– 5. 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002744 24821740 PMC4078289 · DOI
  14. [22]Bazemore AW, Cottrell EK, Gold R, “Community vital signs”: incorporating geocoded social determinants into electronic records to promote patient and population health. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 3; 23(2): 407– 12. 10.1093/jamia/ovc088 26174867 PMC11740537 · DOI
  15. [25]DeVoe JE, Huguet N, Likumahuwa-Ackman S, Testing health information technology tools to facilitate health insurance support: a protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2015 8 25; 10: 123 10.1186/s13012-015-0311-4 26652866 PMC4676134 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cottrell, E. K., Gold, R., Likumahuwa, S., Angier, H., Huguet, N., Cohen, D. J., Clark, K. D., Gottlieb, L. M., & DeVoe, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
Venue
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2018
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
949-963
ISSN
  • 1049-2089 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-6869
OpenAlex
W2885581354
Cited by
41
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01 HS023324)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA181452)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R18DK105463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
Keywords
social determinants of health, health information technology, primary care, conceptual framework, community health centers, clinical decision support, referral, population health, research roadmap
MeSH terms
Humans, Medical Informatics, Primary Health Care, Research, Models, Organizational, Social Determinants of Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review