Moving Electronic Medical Records Upstream
Abstract
Background Knowledge of the biological pathways and mechanisms connecting social factors with health has increased exponentially over the past 25 years, yet in most clinical settings, screening and intervention around social determinants of health are not part of standard clinical care. Electronic medical records provide new opportunities for assessing and managing social needs in clinical settings, particularly those serving vulnerable populations. Purpose To illustrate the feasibility of capturing information and promoting interventions related to social determinants of health in electronic medical records. Methods Three case studies were examined in which electronic medical records have been used to collect data and address social determinants of health in clinical settings. Results From these case studies, we identified multiple functions that electronic medical records can perform to facilitate the integration of social determinants of health into clinical systems, including screening, triaging, referring, tracking, and data sharing. Conclusions If barriers related to incentives, training, and privacy can be overcome, electronic medical record systems can improve the integration of social determinants of health into healthcare delivery systems. More evidence is needed to evaluate the impact of such integration on health care outcomes before widespread adoption can be recommended.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An integrated approach addressing both medical and non-medical needs has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve overall patient satisfaction.
“This integrated approach has the potential to reduce healthcare costs and improve overall patient satisfaction by addressing both medical and non-medical needs.15,16”
From Disparities in digital information exchange and interoperability among family medicine physicians in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Community partnerships can support care coordination for complex patients, particularly those with chronic diseases, by facilitating communication and resource-sharing between healthcare providers and community services.
“Moreover, community partnerships can support care coordination for complex patients, particularly those with chronic diseases, by facilitating communication and resource-sharing between healthcare providers and community services.”
From Disparities in digital information exchange and interoperability among family medicine physicians in the United States (2026) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion regulatory brain function in adulthood
Kim, P., Evans, G. W., Angstadt, M., Ho, S. S., Sripada, C. S., Swain, J. E., Liberzon, I., & Phan, K. L. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308240110 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Cutuli, J. J., Desjardins, C. D., Herbers, J. E., Long, J. D., Heistad, D., Chan, C.-K., Hinz, E., & Masten, A. S. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12013 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social determinants of health and diabetes: A scientific review
Hill-Briggs, F., Adler, N. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Chin, M. H., Gary-Webb, T. L., Navas-Acien, A., Thornton, P. L., & Haire-Joshu, D. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0053 · Cited by 1,732 · see citing works
Adoption of Social Determinants of Health EHR Tools by Community Health Centers
Gold, R., Bunce, A., Cowburn, S., Dambrun, K., Dearing, M., Middendorf, M., Mossman, N., Hollombe, C., Mahr, P., Melgar, G., et al. (2018) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2275 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationGold, R., Cottrell, E., Bunce, A., Middendorf, M., Hollombe, C., Cowburn, S., Mahr, P., & Melgar, G. (2017) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2017.04.170046 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Conrad, Z., Rehm, C. D., Wilde, P., & Mozaffarian, D. (2017) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2016.303608 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Goodday, S. M., Kormilitzin, A., Vaci, N., Liu, Q., Cipriani, A., Smith, T., & Nevado-Holgado, A. (2020) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103429 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Iott, B. E., Pantell, M. S., Adler-Milstein, J., & Gottlieb, L. M. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac154 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationTrout, K. E., & Park, J. (2026) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooag089
- Authors
- Gottlieb, L. M., Tirozzi, K. J., Manchanda, R., Burns, A. R., & Sandel, M. T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- George Washington University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gottlieb, Laura M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 215-218
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072399290
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, social determinants of health, social needs screening, vulnerable populations, triage, referral, data sharing, patient privacy
- MeSH terms
- Feasibility Studies, Humans, Referral and Consultation, United States, Needs Assessment, Electronic Health Records, Social Determinants of Health
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review