The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the Effectiveness of Critical Thinking Instruction
Abstract
There has been a growing trend among colleges in the United States and Canada to require all students to fulfill a requirement in "critical thinking" as part of their general education program. Critical thinking is a widely used term that includes skills in applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and evaluating information and the disposition to apply these skills (National Center for Excellence in Critical Thinking Instruction, 1991). The ability to think critically is almost always listed as one of the desirable outcomes of undergraduate education (Halpern, 1988). Although there is considerable disagreement over who should teach such courses, whether they should be "stand-along" generic courses or incorporated into specific content areas, and what sorts of thinking skills students should be learning in these courses, there is virtually no disagreement over the need to help college students improve how they think (e.g., Perkins & Solomon, 1989). The debate over thinking-skills instruction at the postsecondary level is particularly timely because the goal of increasing the number of college students who can think effectively and solve problems is one component of the National Education Goals advanced by the National Governors' Association and President Bush.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.
Glaser, R. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.93 · Cited by 1,272 · cited 2×
“…there has been some debate about whether it is possible to produce long lasting enhancement in the ability to think effectively (Block, 1985; Glaser, 1984; Resnick, 1983), we now have a considerable body of evidence that thinking-skills courses have positive effects that are transferable to…”
BackgroundLehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O., & Nisbett, R. E. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.6.431 · Cited by 341
A longitudinal study of the effects of undergraduate training on reasoning.
Lehman, D. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1990) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.26.6.952 · Cited by 211
Cited by
Liu, Y., & Pásztor, A. (2022) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101069 · Cited by 400
Tiruneh, D. T., Verburgh, A., & Elen, J. (2014) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v4n1p1 · Cited by 255
Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis
Niu, L., Behar-Horenstein, L. S., & Garvan, C. W. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.12.002 · Cited by 244
El Soufi, N., & See, B. H. (2019) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.006 · Cited by 183
Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. L. (2015) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.02.006 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Halpern, D. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of General Education
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 270-286
- ISSN
- 0021-3667 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-2060
- OpenAlex
- W2066864520
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 29.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.