Cited by 341Education and Critical Thinking DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsStatistics Education and Methodologies

The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday-life events.

Open access
Lehman, Darrin R., Lempert, Richard O., Nisbett, Richard E.·1988·American Psychologist

Abstract

ABSTRACT. " The theory of formal disciplinenthat is, the view that instruction in abstract rule systems can affect reasoning about everyday-life eventsnhas been rejected by 20th century psychologists on the basis of rather scant evidence. We examined the effects of graduate training in law, medicine, psychology, and chemistry on statistical reasoning, methodological reasoning aboutconfounded variables, and reasoning about problems in the logic of the conditional Both psychology and medical training produced large effects on statistical and methodological reasoning, and psychology, medical, and law training pro-duced effects on ability to reason about problems in the logic of the conditional Chemistry training had no effect on any type of reasoning studied. These results eem well understood in terms of the rule systems taught by the

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0003-066x.43.6.431

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that domain-general knowledge can be taught in such a way that it does transfer to new situations.

    “Although transfer of knowledge is notoriously difficult to achieve through instruction, there is evidence that such domain-general knowledge can be taught in such a way that it does transfer to new situations (Bassok & Holyoak, 1989;Fong, Krantz, & Nisbett, 1986;Lehman, Lempert, & Nisbett, 1988;Nisbett, Fong, Lehman, & Cheng, 1987).”
  • Lehman et al. (1988) found that graduate training in psychology and in medicine greatly improved graduate students' performance on everyday reasoning tasks involving experimentation and statistics.

    “Moreover, Lehman et al. (1988) found that graduate training in psychology and in medicine greatly improved graduate students' performance on everyday reasoning tasks involving experimentation and statistics.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. D'Andrade, R. (1982). Paper presented at the Symposium on the Ecology of Cognition: Biological, Cultural, and Historical Perspectives, Greensboro, NC.
  2. Hayes, J. R., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Psychological differences among problem isomorphs. In N. J. Castellan, Jr., D. B. Pisoni, & G. R. Potts (Eds.), Cognitive theory (pp. 21-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O., & Nisbett, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
American Psychologist
Published
1988-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
431-442
ISSN
  • 0003-066X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-990X
OpenAlex
W2044683535
Cited by
341
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 15
FWCI
66.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Psychologist (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistics Education and Methodologies
Keywords
formal discipline, graduate education, reasoning, statistical reasoning, conditional logic, rule systems, medical training, psychology education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review