CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Racial Labor Market Gaps: The Role of Abilities and Schooling Choices

Urzúa, Sergio·2008·Journal of Human Resources
DOI 10.1353/jhr.2008.0011
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between abilities, schooling choices, and black-white differentials in labor market outcomes. The analysis is based on a model of endogenous schooling choices. Agents' schooling decisions are based on expected future earnings, family background, and unobserved abilities. Earnings are also determined by unobserved abilities. The analysis distinguishes unobserved abilities from observed test scores. The model is implemented using data from the NLSY79. The results indicate that, even after controlling for abilities, there exist significant racial labor market gaps. They also suggest that the standard practice of equating observed test scores may overcompensate for differentials in ability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jhr.2008.0011

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 130

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Urzúa, S.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Urzúa, Sergio
ORCID
Urzúa, Sergio
Venue
Journal of Human Resources
Publisher
University of Wisconsin Press
Published
2008
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
919-971
ISSN
  • 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8004
DOI
10.1353/jhr.2008.0011
OpenAlex
W2125431809
Cited by
130
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
23.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
unobserved ability, test equating, ability assessment, family background, National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review