Do Affirmative Action Bans Lower Minority College Enrollment and Attainment?: Evidence from Statewide Bans
Abstract
Using institutional data on race-specific college enrollment and completion, I examine whether minority students were less likely to enroll in a four-year public college or receive a degree following a statewide affirmative action ban. As in previous studies, I find that black and Hispanic enrollment dropped at the top institutions; however, there is little evidence that overall black enrollment at public universities fell. Finally, despite evidence that fewer blacks and Hispanics graduated from college following a ban, the effects on graduation rates are very noisy.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Selective schools see a drop in minority enrollment following affirmative action bans, while overall college enrollment rates remain relatively unaffected following a ban.
“While estimates suggest selective schools see a drop in minority enrollment following affirmative action bans(Long 2004 andHinrichs 2012), overall college enrollment rates remain relatively unaffected following a ban(Backes 2012 andHinrichs 2012).”
From Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209 (2014) · cites this paper as Backes 2012
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209
Bleemer, Z. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab027 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E., Coate, P., & Hotz, V. J. (2014) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Backes, B.
- Corresponding author
- Backes, Ben
- ORCID
- Backes, Ben
- Venue
- Journal of Human Resources
- Publisher
- University of Wisconsin Press
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 435-455
- ISSN
- 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
- 1548-8004
- OpenAlex
- W2007251698
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 43.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- affirmative action bans, college enrollment, college graduation rates, minority students, Black students, Hispanic students, public universities, higher education access
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review