Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209
Open accessAbstract
Proposition 209 banned race-based affirmative action at California public universities in 1998. Using a difference-in-differences research design and a newly constructed longitudinal database linking all 1994–2002 University of California applicants to their educational experiences and wages, I show that ending affirmative action caused underrepresented minority (URM) freshman applicants to cascade into lower-quality colleges. The “mismatch hypothesis” implies that this cascade would provide net educational benefits to URM applicants, but their degree attainment declined overall and in STEM fields, especially among less academically qualified applicants. URM applicants’ average wages in their twenties and thirties subsequently declined, driven by declines among Hispanic applicants. These declines are not explained by URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences, which were unchanged after Prop 209. Ending affirmative action also deterred thousands of qualified URM students from applying to any UC campus. Complementary regression discontinuity and institutional value-added analyses suggest that affirmative action’s net educational and wage benefits for URM applicants exceed its net costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Ending race-based affirmative action at UC after Proposition 209 caused underrepresented minority applicants to cascade into less-selective universities, reducing degree attainment and early-career wages, especially for Hispanic applicants. The results are inconsistent with the Mismatch Hypothesis and suggest affirmative action's net wage benefits for URM applicants exceeded its small costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.
Key findings
- Prop 209 reduced URM applicants' likelihood of admission to UC's most selective campuses by as much as 50 percentage points relative to academically comparable non-URM applicants; URM enrollment at more-selective UC campuses fell 7.6 percentage points, with at least 1,200 URM UC applicants exiting UC campuses and 800 entering. UC also received about 250 fewer Black and 900 fewer Hispanic applications annually after Prop 209.
- Bachelor's degree attainment declined by 4.3 percentage points among URM UC applicants in the bottom AI quartile; unconditional STEM degree attainment declined by 1.0 percentage point; graduate degree attainment declined by 1.3 percentage points, with STEM master's/doctoral attainment declining 0.58 percentage points.
- URM UC applicants' average annual wages declined by 5 percent between ages 24 and 34; each applicant became 1.4 percentage points less likely to earn $100,000 annually in their early 30s. By 2014, Prop 209 had caused at least a 3 percent aggregate decline in high-earning early-career URM Californians, almost wholly driven by Hispanic applicants.
- Less-selective UC enrollment did not improve URM students' STEM performance or persistence; STEM persistence change had a 95% confidence interval of -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, and STEM course grades were precisely unchanged. A Berkeley regression discontinuity found on-the-margin non-URM students enrolled at similar-quality universities and had similar educational and labor market outcomes.
Methods
- Difference-in-difference design comparing URM and non-URM California-resident freshman UC applicants before and after Prop 209 (1996-97 vs. 1998-99; robustness using 1994-95), with high school fixed effects and Academic Index covariates. The sample links all 1994-2002 UC applicants to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment/degree records, California Employment Development Department wages, and UC transcript records.
- Additional analyses include an application-deterrence model using UC-eligible high school graduates by school, ethnicity, and AI bin; a regression discontinuity at UC Berkeley's 1996-97 non-URM admissions threshold; institutional value-added estimates; and STEM course-sequence models across five UC campuses.
Limitations
- Stated: the reduced-form estimates average over many URM students likely unimpacted by Prop 209, so they likely substantially underestimate effects on students whose enrollment was shifted; they omit impacts on URM Californians dissuaded from UC application; and they omit labor market outcomes for non-Californian and self-employed workers.
- Stated/evident: value-added statistics likely retain some selection bias and tend to exaggerate differences across institutions; application deterrence could generate sample selection bias, though the paper reports baseline estimates are highly insensitive to detailed controls.
- Evident: wage records cover only California unemployment-insurance-covered employment; NSC records are incomplete for some institutions and periods; and non-URM applicants are not a true control group because some likely crowded into more-selective universities after Prop 209.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 20 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationreasoning
Selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209.
“Second, that latter return substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants, suggesting that selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 (as in Dale and Krueger (2014)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dale and Krueger (2014) source
- Interpretationcitation
The return to more-selective enrollment among URM UC applicants substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants.
“Second, that latter return substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants, suggesting that selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 (as in Dale and Krueger (2014)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Dale and Krueger (2014) source
The Introduction and Conclusion report that, unlike the generally near-zero selection-adjusted estimates, returns to college selectivity remain positive for Black and Hispanic students in the 1989 cohort. That supports the cited analogy, but the paper does not establish a comparison with institutional value-added for URM UC applicants or estimate effects for applicants affected by Prop 209. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingnone given
There was a simultaneous sharp rise in URM admits' average test scores.
“with a simultaneous sharp rise in URM admits' average test scores.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Before Prop 209, only about three percent of similar-AI non-URM applicants enrolled at the three more-selective UC campuses.
“while only about three percent of similar-AI non-URM applicants did so.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Enrolling at less-selective UC campuses did not improve URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences.
“Enrolling at less-selective UC campuses did not improve URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingnone given
There are about four times as many non-URM UC applicants as URM applicants.
“There are about four times as many non-URM UC applicants as URM applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The top AI quartile of Black applicants faced a 15 percentage point enrollment decline.
“with the top AI quartile of Black applicants facing a 15 percentage point enrollment decline”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM UC applicants became even less likely to earn degrees after affirmative action was eliminated, with a 95-percent confidence interval of -1.69 to 0.27 percentage point change in average six-year degree attainment.
“and if anything became even less likely to earn degrees after affirmative action was eliminated, with a 95-percent confidence interval of -1.69 to 0.27 percentage point change in average six-year degree attainment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average number of non-URM annual applications received by UC increased by more than 25 percent between 1994 and 1999.
“The average number of non-URM annual applications received by UC increased by more than 25 percent in the period, with increases of 42 percent at the more-selective campuses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
At UCLA, average SAT scores rose 27 points among admits.
“At UCLA, for example, average SAT scores rose 17 points among non-URM applicants and 27 points among admits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants at the 25th percentile became less likely to enroll at the selective campuses.
“those at the 25th percentile became less likely to enroll at the selective campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
URM applicants' average SAT scores rose swiftly through the period.
“URM applicants' average SAT scores rose swiftly through the period”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Berkeley and UCLA each annually admitted more than 500 additional URM applicants using affirmative action.
“It shows that Berkeley and UCLA each annually admitted more than 500 annual additional URM applicants using affirmative action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
American Community Survey data confirm a 2010s pattern of relative wage deterioration among high-earning early-career URM Californians.
“American Community Survey data confirm a 2010s pattern of relative wage deterioration among high-earning early-career URM Californians.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants' undergraduate degree attainment declined overall after Prop 209.
“URM applicants' undergraduate and graduate degree attainment declined overall and in STEM fields, especially among lower-testing applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to be 7.6 percentage points less likely to enroll at the more-selective UC campuses.
“Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to be 7.6 percentage points less likely to enroll at the more-selective UC campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
URM enrollment rates rose slightly at UC's less-selective campuses.
“and rose slightly at the less-selective campuses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At Berkeley, 1994-1995 URM applicants with AIs between 6,000 to 7,100 were 80 percentage points more likely to be admitted than same-AI non-URM applicants.
“At the most-selective Berkeley campus, for example, 1994-1995 URM applicants with AIs between 6,000 to 7,100 were 80 percentage points more likely to be admitted than same-AI non-URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Prop 209 deterred thousands of qualified URM students from applying to any UC campus.
“Prop 209 also deterred thousands of qualified URM students from applying to any UC campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At least 1,200 URM UC applicants exited UC campuses after Prop 209.
“Table A-7 shows that at least 1,200 URM UC applicants exited UC campuses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Prop 209's monotonicity holds.
- Findingcitation
After 1998, URM applicants to UC campuses became substantially less likely to earn admission at every campus.
“After 1998, URM applicants to UC campuses became substantially less likely to earn admission at every campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Bachelor's degree attainment declined by 4.3 percentage points among URM UC applicants in the bottom AI quartile.
“Bachelor's degree attainment declined by 4.3 percentage points among URM UC applicants in the bottom AI quartile, and URM applicants' STEM degree attainment declined by 1.0 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The return to more-selective enrollment among URM UC applicants is measurably large.
“First, the return to UC Berkeley admission for onthe-margin non-URM students appears small, while the return to more-selective enrollment among URM UC applicants is measurably large.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to enroll at less-selective universities with lower average SAT scores and graduation rates.
“Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to enroll at less-selective universities with lower average SAT scores and graduation rates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UC annually received about 250 fewer Black and 900 fewer Hispanic applications after Prop 209.
“I find that UC annually received about 250 fewer Black and 900 fewer Hispanic applications after Prop 209, almost 80 percent of whom would likely have been admitted to at least one UC campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
URM applicants at the 60th AI percentile became about 10 percentage points relatively more likely to enroll at the selective campuses.
“URM applicants at the 60th AI percentile became about 10 percentage points relatively more likely to enroll at the selective campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 led to larger relative enrollment declines at the more-selective UC campuses for Black applicants.
“Prop 209 led to larger relative enrollment declines at the moreselective UC campuses for Black applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Black applicants were much more likely to flow into Ivy+ and out-of-state universities than Hispanic applicants.
“and Black applicants were much more likely to flow into Ivy+ and out-of-state universities than Hispanic applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At UC San Diego, URM enrollment decreased relative to non-URM for applicants with somewhat-lower AIs (20-60th percentiles).
“and decreased for those with somewhat-lower AIs (20-60th percentiles).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is little evidence that university affirmative action narrowed the Black-white economic mobility gap.
“I find little evidence that university affirmative action narrowed the Blackwhite economic mobility gap, which has received particular attention (Dobbie and Fryer Jr, 2011; Billings, Deming, and Rockoff, 2014; Chetty et al., 2020b), but find that it improved Black educational attainment and provided large long-run wage benefits to (mostly lower-income) Hispanic youths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After Prop 209, the gap in enrollment at more-selective UC campuses between median-AI URM and similar-AI non-URM applicants largely closed.
“After Prop 209, this gap largely closed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
URM enrollment rates fell precipitously at UC's more-selective campuses.
“URM enrollment rates fell precipitously at UC's more-selective campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
University affirmative action provided large long-run wage benefits to (mostly lower-income) Hispanic youths.
“I find little evidence that university affirmative action narrowed the Blackwhite economic mobility gap, which has received particular attention (Dobbie and Fryer Jr, 2011; Billings, Deming, and Rockoff, 2014; Chetty et al., 2020b), but find that it improved Black educational attainment and provided large long-run wage benefits to (mostly lower-income) Hispanic youths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants' relative likelihood of enrollment at Berkeley and UCLA substantially declined across the AI spectrum.
“URM applicants' relative likelihood of enrollment at Berkeley and UCLA substantially declined across the AI spectrum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UC San Diego exhibits a pattern common to California's other public universities: URM enrollment increased relative to non-URM enrollment for higher-AI applicants (70-95th percentiles).
“UC San Diego exhibits a pattern common to California's other public universities: URM enrollment increased relative to non-URM enrollment for higher-AI applicants (70-95th percentiles)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
This resulted in a substantial net outflow of lower-income students from highly-selective public universities.
“This resulted in a substantial net outflow of lower-income students from highly-selective public universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The admissions advantage shifted to higher-AI applicants over time as campuses became more selective overall.
“Seven of the eight UC campuses provided similar admissions advantages to URM applicants under affirmative action, with the advantage shifting to higher-AI applicants over time as the campuses became more selective overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
At UCLA, average SAT scores rose 17 points among non-URM applicants.
“At UCLA, for example, average SAT scores rose 17 points among non-URM applicants and 27 points among admits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused a 1.3 percentage point decline in each URM applicant's likelihood of earning a graduate degree.
“Prop 209 also caused a 1.3 percentage point decline in each URM applicant's likelihood of earning a graduate degree, with much of that decline in STEM fields.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Average SAT scores of most UC campuses' applicants steadily rose during the period.
“Meanwhile, the average SAT scores of most campuses' applicants were steadily rising”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
University affirmative action improved Black educational attainment.
“I find little evidence that university affirmative action narrowed the Blackwhite economic mobility gap, which has received particular attention (Dobbie and Fryer Jr, 2011; Billings, Deming, and Rockoff, 2014; Chetty et al., 2020b), but find that it improved Black educational attainment and provided large long-run wage benefits to (mostly lower-income) Hispanic youths.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Most campuses' URM admissions rates slowly declined until 1997 but then sharply declined in 1998.
“Most campuses' URM admissions rates slowly declined until 1997 but then sharply declined in 1998”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The average URM UC applicant's wages declined by five percent annually between ages 24 and 34 after Prop 209.
“As a result, the average URM UC applicant's wages declined by five percent annually between ages 24 and 34, almost wholly driven by declines among Hispanic applicants.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“Following these applicants into the labor market, I find that Prop 209 led URM UC applicants to earn five percent lower average annual wages between ages 24 and 34 than they would have earned had affirmative action continued, with larger proportional effects for lower-AI applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Before Prop 209, about 30 percent of median-AI URM applicants enrolled at the three more-selective UC campuses.
“Before Prop 209, about 30 percent of median-AI URM applicants enrolled at the three more-selective UC campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Lower-AI URM applicants' selective UC enrollment declined.
“while lower-AI URM applicants' selective UC enrollment declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants at the 25th percentile became more likely to enroll at less-selective campuses.
“but more likely to enroll at less-selective campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants' degree attainment in STEM fields declined after Prop 209.
“URM applicants' undergraduate and graduate degree attainment declined overall and in STEM fields, especially among lower-testing applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 led URM UC applicants to enroll at relatively lower-quality colleges and universities.
“I show that Prop 209 led URM UC applicants to enroll at relatively lower-quality colleges and universities, measuring quality both by traditional statistics like average test scores and graduation rates and by novel institutional value-added statistics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
More than 800 URM UC applicants exited Berkeley and UCLA after Prop 209.
“with more than 800 exiting Berkeley and UCLA”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Prop 209's monotonicity holds.
- Findingown data
Each URM applicant became 1.4 percentage points less likely to annually earn $100,000 in their early 30s.
“Each applicant became 1.4 percentage points less likely to annually earn $100,000 (the 95 th wage percentile) in their early 30s.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to enroll at institutions that lead their students to lower likelihoods of Bachelor's degree attainment by 0.5-0.9 percentage points.
“Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to enroll at institutions that (on average) lead their students to lower likelihoods of Bachelor's degree attainment by 0.5-0.9percentage points”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
URM enrollment rates slightly declined at UC's selective campuses.
“slightly declined at the selective campuses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The declines in enrollment institution quality were larger among lower-AI applicants.
“with larger declines among lower-AI applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
800 URM UC applicants entered UC campuses after Prop 209.
“and 800 entered UC campuses after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Prop 209's monotonicity holds.
- Findingown data
The 7.6 percentage point decline was particularly driven by the second and third URM AI quartiles.
“particularly driven by the second and third URM AI quartiles”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The bottom AI quartile's enrollment largely flowed from the more-selective and selective UC campuses to less-selective public and private California universities.
“whose enrollment was shown above to largely flow from the more-selective and selective UC campuses to less-selective public and private California universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Higher-AI URM applicants became more likely to enroll at the selective and less-selective campuses.
“Higher-AI URM applicants became more likely to enroll at the selective and less-selective campuses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants' STEM degree attainment declined by 1.0 percentage points.
“Bachelor's degree attainment declined by 4.3 percentage points among URM UC applicants in the bottom AI quartile, and URM applicants' STEM degree attainment declined by 1.0 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM students' outcomes largely decline in exactly 1998.
“While I find that using 1994-95 as an alternative baseline generally yields slightly larger estimates of Prop 209's effect, URM students' outcomes largely decline in exactly 1998.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The magnitude of the remaining sample selection bias is very small.
“I directly quantify the degree of Prop 209's URM application deterrence in Section 4 and present evidence that the magnitude of the remaining bias is very small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Value-added declines were smaller among high-AI URM applicants.
“with smaller value-added declines among high-AI URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 led to small corresponding enrollment increases across the spectrum of other public and private higher education institutions.
“and led to small corresponding enrollment increases across the spectrum of other public and private higher education institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ending affirmative action caused UC's 10,000 annual URM freshman applicants to cascade into lower-quality public and private universities.
“Ending affirmative action caused UC's 10,000 annual underrepresented minority (URM) freshman applicants to cascade into lower-quality public and private universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Seven of the eight UC campuses provided similar admissions advantages to URM applicants under affirmative action.
“Seven of the eight UC campuses provided similar admissions advantages to URM applicants under affirmative action, with the advantage shifting to higher-AI applicants over time as the campuses became more selective overall.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
URM UC applicants were less likely to earn Bachelor's degrees than academically-comparable non-URM applicants under AA.
“The first two columns show that URM UC applicants were less likely to earn Bachelor's degrees than academically-comparable non-URM applicants under AA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The wage effects were larger proportionally for lower-AI applicants.
“Following these applicants into the labor market, I find that Prop 209 led URM UC applicants to earn five percent lower average annual wages between ages 24 and 34 than they would have earned had affirmative action continued, with larger proportional effects for lower-AI applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These gaps are largely explained by students' prior academic opportunities and preparedness, not their enrollment institution.
“While I find that before Prop 209 URM UC students earned lower grades and were less likely to persist along introductory STEM course sequences than their non-URM peers, these gaps are largely explained by students' prior academic opportunities and preparedness, not their enrollment institution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The effect on six-year degree attainment is wholly driven by the bottom AI quartile of URM applicants.
“This effect is wholly driven by the bottom AI quartile of URM applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is little evidence of labor market deterioration among Black UC applicants after Prop 209.
“The observed wage effects are almost wholly driven by Hispanic applicants; despite similar enrollment and degree attainment outcomes, I find little evidence of labor market deterioration among Black UC applicants after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused URM UC applicants to enroll at institutions whose graduates earn $400-$900 lower annual early-30s wages.
“and whose graduates earn $400-$900 lower annual early-30s wages”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Admissions rates consistently fell at all but the least-selective Riverside campus.
“As a result, admissions rates consistently fell at all but the least-selective Riverside campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
URM applicants across the full AI distribution became less likely to enroll at more-selective UC campuses.
“URM applicants across the full AI distribution became less likely to enroll at more-selective UC campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Increasing selectivity of UC campuses led to decreased enrollment likelihoods of all but the highest-AI non-URM applicants.
“Meanwhile, the increasing selectivity of UC campuses also led to decreased enrollment likelihoods of all but the highest-AI non-URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The teaching-oriented CSU university system and California community colleges also absorbed some low-AI URM applicants.
“The teachingoriented CSU university system and California community colleges also absorbed some low-AI URM applicants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants' graduate degree attainment declined overall after Prop 209.
“URM applicants' undergraduate and graduate degree attainment declined overall and in STEM fields, especially among lower-testing applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The institutions where URM UC applicants enrolled after Prop 209 are estimated to have lower average value-added.
“Those institutions are also estimated to have lower average”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The return to UC Berkeley admission for on-the-margin non-URM students appears small.
“First, the return to UC Berkeley admission for onthe-margin non-URM students appears small, while the return to more-selective enrollment among URM UC applicants is measurably large.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The wage decline was almost wholly driven by declines among Hispanic applicants.
“As a result, the average URM UC applicant's wages declined by five percent annually between ages 24 and 34, almost wholly driven by declines among Hispanic applicants.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“The observed wage effects are almost wholly driven by Hispanic applicants; despite similar enrollment and degree attainment outcomes, I find little evidence of labor market deterioration among Black UC applicants after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Findingown data
Ending UC's affirmative action policies caused URM applicants to become less likely to earn any graduate degrees.
“but it did cause them to become less likely to earn STEM degrees and any graduate degrees”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After Prop 209, many highly-qualified URM public high school graduates sent SAT scores to a UC campus but nevertheless did not apply.
“in fact, after Prop 209 many highly-qualified URM public high school graduates sent SAT scores to a UC campus but nevertheless did not apply.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Educational outcomes after Prop 209 appear broadly similar for Black and Hispanic applicants.
“Educational outcomes after Prop 209 appear broadly similar for Black and Hispanic applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Academically-comparable URM and non-URM workers earned similar wages before Prop 209 but diverged afterwards.
“showing that academically-comparable URM and non-URM workers earned similar wages before Prop 209 but diverged afterwards.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Compared to a 1996-97 baseline, the difference-in-difference estimates imply that each URM applicant became about 1.3 percentage points less likely to earn at least $100,000 per year in California in 2014.
“Compared to a 1996-97 (1994-1995) baseline, the difference-in-difference estimates above imply that each of those applicants became about 1.3 (3.1) percentage points less likely to earn at least $100,000 per year in California in 2014”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AI and ethnicity explained 40-70 percent of admissions variation at most mid-1990s UC campuses.
“AI and ethnicity explained 40-70 percent of admissions variation at most mid-1990s UC campuses; see Figure A-1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Prop 209 discouraged thousands of additional academically-competitive URM students from sending applications to public research universities in the first place.
“Prop 209 also discouraged thousands of additional academicallycompetitive URM students from sending applications to public research universities in the first place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Applicants' changed degree attainment is less than half of the change in the six-year graduation rates of the institutions where they enroll.
“Applicants' changed degree attainment is less than half of the change in the six-year graduation rates of the institutions where they enroll”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Ending UC's affirmative action policies caused URM applicants to become less likely to earn STEM degrees.
“but it did cause them to become less likely to earn STEM degrees and any graduate degrees”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM application rates following Prop 209 declined by between 4 and 6 percent of all UC-eligible URM public high school graduates.
“It shows that URM application rates following Prop 209 declined by between 4 and 6 percent of all UC-eligible URM public high school graduates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The true distribution of AI across school-year-ethnicity cohorts remains unchanged over time.
- Findingown data
Application rates among Asian students increased by less than two percent relative to white applications after Prop 209.
“As a placebo test, it also shows that application rates among Asian students increased by less than two percent relative to white applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This ratio is lower than those estimated by Cohodes and Goodman (2014) and Bleemer (2018a) in other contexts.
“a lower ratio than those estimated by Cohodes and Goodman (2014) and Bleemer (2018a) in other contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohodes and Goodman (2014) source
- cites Bleemer (2018a)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Adding family background covariates like parental income, education, and occupation does not change the estimated coefficient for the decline in URM persistence at Berkeley.
“however, adding those covariates does not change the estimated coefficient.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Prop 209 caused an annual decline in URM UC enrollment of about 800 students in 1998-99, or 14 percent.
“Combined with the estimated enrollment decline among UC applicants, this implies that Prop 209 caused an annual decline in URM UC enrollment of about 800 students in 1998-99, or 14 percent.”
- Also stated in: § 8. CONCLUSION · hedged
“The total enrollment of Black and Hispanic students at the University of California declined by about 800 students per year after 1998, when the university's eight undergraduate campuses all ceased implementing race-based affirmative action as a result of Proposition 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § 8. CONCLUSION · hedged
- Findingown data
The increased likelihood of Berkeley admission causes about one-third of newly-admitted on-the-margin non-URM students to enroll.
“Figure 10(b) shows that the increased likelihood of Berkeley admission causes about one-third of newly-admitted on-the-margin non-URM students to enroll.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM UC applicants' educational declines after Prop 209 are generally somewhat larger when compared to a 1995 baseline.
“Table A-12 shows that URM UC applicants' educational declines after Prop 209 are generally somewhat larger when compared to a 1995 baseline”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 caused no estimable change in Asian applicants' longer-run wage outcomes relative to other non-URM applicants.
“Figure A-15 shows that Prop 209 also caused no estimable change in Asian applicants' longer-run wage outcomes relative to other non-URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Prop 209 caused a decline in unconditional STEM degree attainment by 1.0 percentage point (s.e. 0.4).
“this provides strong evidence for Prop 209 causing a decline in unconditional STEM degree attainment by 1.0 percentage point (s.e.0.4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effects of Prop 209 on URM persistence were tightly-estimated 0's at the other four observed UC campuses.
“Table A-19 shows that the effects of Prop 209 on URM persistence were tightlyestimated 0's at the other four other observed UC campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM students were particularly discouraged from applying to the Berkeley and UCLA campuses after Prop 209.
“It shows that URM students were particularly discouraged from applying to the Berkeley and UCLA campuses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants became 1.3 percentage points (s.e. 0.5) less likely to earn graduate degrees after Prop 209 relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.
“URM applicants became 1.3 percentage points (s.e.0.5) less likely to earn graduate degrees after Prop 209 relative to academicallycomparable non-URM applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fields with largest increases in URM UC applicants' fields of study after 1998 are biology (0.62 percentage points) and miscellaneous humanities fields (0.30).
“the fields with largest increases after 1998 are biology (0.62 percentage points) and miscellaneous humanities fields (0.30)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is little evidence of a wage decline for Black applicants following Prop 209.
“there is little such evidence for Black applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Black applicants already earned substantially lower average wages than academically-comparable Hispanic students before Prop 209.
“with Black applicants already earning substantially lower average wages than academically-comparable Hispanic students”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 had no net effect on URM UC applicants' California labor market participation.
“The first panel shows that Prop 209 had no net effect on URM UC applicants' California labor market participation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the two years before Prop 209, URM UC enrollees were less likely to persist along STEM course sequences by 9.3 percentage points.
“and were less likely to persist along STEM course sequences by 9.3 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
American Community Survey estimates show that there were 27,000 URM Californians earning over $100,000 in 2014.
“American Community Survey estimates show that there were 27,000 URM Californians earning over $100,000 in 2014”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites American Community Survey
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
There is no evidence of a decline in medical degree attainment after Prop 209.
“and no such evidence for medical degrees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Almost half of the decline in graduate degree attainment can be explained by a decline in STEM-oriented masters and doctoral degrees, for which attainment declines 0.58 percentage points (s.e. 0.21).
“Almost half of this decline can be explained by a decline in STEM-oriented masters and doctoral degrees, for which attainment declines 0.58 percentage points (s.e.0.21).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effects' magnitudes are a small fraction of those observed for URM students.
“the effects' magnitudes are a small fraction of those observed for URM students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Compared to a 1994-1995 baseline, the difference-in-difference estimates imply that each URM applicant became about 3.1 percentage points less likely to earn at least $100,000 per year in California in 2014.
“Compared to a 1996-97 (1994-1995) baseline, the difference-in-difference estimates above imply that each of those applicants became about 1.3 (3.1) percentage points less likely to earn at least $100,000 per year in California in 2014”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Ending UC's affirmative action policies did not lead URM applicants to earn higher grades in challenging courses.
“Ending UC's affirmative action policies did not lead the university's URM applicants to earn higher grades in challenging courses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Estimates are similar relative to mean class wages or including class fixed effects.
“Estimates are similar relative to mean class wages or including class fixed effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Application deterrence caused a decline in URM UC enrollment by about 450 students, half from Berkeley and UCLA.
“Table A-7 links these application declines to the AI-and campus-specific enrollment changes presented in Figure 3 to show that application deterrence caused a decline in URM UC enrollment by about 450 students, half from Berkeley and UCLA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM applicants may have become somewhat less likely to earn STEM degrees conditional on earning a college degree (95-percent c.i. -1.65 to 0.35 percentage points).
“The third and fourth columns of Table 3 show that URM applicants may have become somewhat less likely to earn STEM degrees conditional on earning a college degree (95-percent c.i. -1.65 to 0.35 percentage points).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The resulting percentiles exhibit minimal trend in the years before and after Prop 209, with an approximately one percentage point decline observed between 1997 and 1998 caused by Prop 209.
“Panel (f) shows that the resulting percentiles exhibit minimal trend in the years before and after Prop 209, with an approximately one percentage point decline observed between 1997 and 1998 caused by Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The increase in class rank did not translate into any observable improvement in URM students' likelihood of STEM persistence or course grades.
“However, this increase in class rank did not translate into any observable improvement in those students' likelihood of STEM persistence or course grades.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Applicants in the other quartiles do not appear to have faced declines in degree attainment despite enrolling at institutions with lower graduation rates.
“while applicants in the other quartiles do not appear to have faced declines in degree attainment despite enrolling at institutions with lower graduation rates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
UC-ineligible applicants were only slightly deterred by Prop 209.
“and that UC-ineligible applicants were only slightly deterred by Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The wages of Hispanic students sharply declined following Prop 209 relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.
“While the wages of Hispanic students sharply declined following Prop 209 relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among wage-earning UC applicants, Prop 209 caused URM workers' wages to decline by $2,400 (0.04 log points) in their early 30s.
“or $2,400 (0.04 log points) in their early 30s.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
URM UC enrollees' STEM major choice is precisely unchanged relative to academically-comparable non-URM enrollees after Prop 209, with a 95 percent confidence interval rejecting increases above 1.5 percentage points.
“URM UC enrollees' STEM major choice is precisely unchanged relative to academically-comparable non-URM enrollees after Prop 209, with a 95 percent confidence interval rejecting increases above 1.5 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
69 percent of applicants annually earned covered California wages before and after Prop 209.
“69 percent of applicants annually earned covered California wages before and after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
On average, a one percentile change in the 2001-17 URM wage distributions corresponds to $1,940, closely matching the estimated decline in URM UC applicants' wages after Prop 209.
“On average, a one percentile change in the 2001-17 URM wage distributions corresponds to $1,940, closely matching the estimated decline in URM UC applicants' wages after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Even the least-selective Riverside campus rejected low-AI applicants with certain intended majors.
“and even the leastselective Riverside campus rejected low-AI applicants with certain intended majors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Relative to academically-comparable non-URM UC students, 1996-97 URM students were 7.3 percentiles lower in their classes' SAT distribution, largely reflecting their enrollment at relatively more-selective UC campuses.
“Relative to academically-comparable non-URM UC students, however, 1996-97 URM students were 7.3 percentiles lower in their classes' SAT distribution, largely reflecting their enrollment at relatively more-selective UC campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The bottom AI quartile had an estimated ratio closer to 1.
“The bottom AI quartile had an estimated ratio closer to 1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This study's baseline results show that banning affirmative action leads to large relative educational and labor market declines for URM university applicants.
“This study's baseline results show that banning affirmative action leads to large relative educational and labor market declines for URM university applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among wage-earning UC applicants, Prop 209 caused URM workers' wages to persistently decline by an average of $1,800 (0.05 log points).
“Among wage-earning UC applicants, however, Prop 209 caused URM workers' wages to persistently decline by an average of $1,800 (0.05 log points)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The fields with largest decreases are economics (-0.39), history (-0.32), and mathematics (-0.29).
“while those with the largest decreases are economics (-0.39), history (-0.32), and mathematics (-0.29)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The decline in graduate degree attainment was particularly large among lower-AI applicants.
“with particularly-large declines among lower-AI applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Wage declines are proportionally larger for lower-AI URM applicants.
“Table A-13 shows that these wage declines are proportionally larger for lower-AI URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Undergraduate degree attainment declined among lower-testing URM applicants after Prop 209.
“and undergraduate degree attainment declined among lower-testing URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Figure A-10 shows that the fraction of early-and mid-30s URM Californians earning wages above $100,000 disproportionately declined in the years that those cohorts would have lost selective university access as a result of Prop 209.
“Figure A-10 shows that the fraction of early-and mid-30s URM Californians earning wages above $100,000 indeed disproportionately declined in the years that those cohorts would have lost selective university access as a result of Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is only weak evidence of a decline in law degree attainment after Prop 209.
“There is only weak evidence of a decline in law degree attainment”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hispanic students earn somewhat higher wages than academically-comparable non-URM applicants.
“who also earn somewhat higher wages than academically-comparable non-URM applicants”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Members of several comparison groups all became slightly more likely to earn over $100,000 over the period.
“Members of several comparison groups -including slightly older URM Californians, similar-aged URM non-Californians, and similar-aged non-URM Californians -all became slightly more likely to earn over $100,000 over the period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the two years before Prop 209, URM UC enrollees earned lower average grades in introductory STEM courses by 0.36 GPA points.
“In the two years before Prop 209, URM UC enrollees earned lower average grades in introductory STEM courses by 0.36 GPA points”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These gaps are broadly present across most introductory STEM courses.
“These gaps are broadly present across most introductory STEM courses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Ending affirmative action led to substantial relative declines in URM students' persistence and performance across most STEM courses at Berkeley.
“Unlike at those other campuses, however, ending affirmative action led to substantial relative declines in URM students' persistence and performance across most STEM courses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Estimates are largely insensitive to omitting students in Colleges of Engineering.
“Estimates are largely insensitive to omitting students in Colleges of Engineering, who may face different incentives around completing STEM course sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
As late as age 34, there is no evidence that the average wages of URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 recover to their earlier levels.
“As late as age 34, there is no evidence that the average wages of URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 recover to their earlier levels.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Prop 209 similarly impacted Black and Hispanic UC enrollees' STEM persistence and performance outcomes.
“Figure A-12 shows that Prop 209 similarly impacted Black and Hispanic UC enrollees' STEM persistence and performance outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 6.2 percent of the baseline sample did not have observed enrollment in NSC.
“Table A-6 shows that only 6.2 percent of the baseline sample did not have observed enrollment in NSC”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 1996-97, among the 88 percent of missing-ethnicity applicants whose ethnicity can be classified, 68 percent are white, 29 percent are Asian, 2.5 percent are Hispanic, and 0.6 percent are Black.
“In 1996-97, I find that among the 88 percent of missing-ethnicity applicants whose ethnicity can be classified, 68 percent are white, 29 percent are Asian, 2.5 percent are Hispanic, and 0.6 percent are Black.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After Prop 209, URM applicants' admissions advantages at Berkeley and UCLA fell to 13 and 11 percentage points.
“these advantages fell to 13 and 11 percentage points after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
California labor market participation is unchanged after Prop 209 for all four AI quartiles of URM applicants.
“Figure A-8 shows that California labor market participation is unchanged after Prop 209 for all four AI quartiles of URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Every UC campus saw sharp immediate declines in URM admission between 1997 and 1998.
“but every UC campus saw sharp immediate declines in URM admission between 1997 and 1998”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The percent of UC applicants who declined to report ethnicity increased from 4.1 percent in 1996-97 to 10.5 percent in 1998-99.
“The percent of UC applicants who declined to report ethnicity on their application increased from 4.1 percent in 1996-97 to 10.5 percent in 1998-99”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is a small measurable enrollment shift from community and private California colleges into non-California universities and the less-selective UC campuses among Asian students.
“There is a small measurable enrollment shift from community and private California colleges into non-California universities and the less-selective UC campuses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The estimated change in institutional six-year graduation rate across the threshold is -0.2 percentage points, with a 2.1 standard error.
“The estimated change in institutional six-year graduation rate across the threshold is -0.2 percentage points, with a 2.1 standard error.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Coverage at the somewhat-selective institutions at which UC applicants tended to enroll was substantially higher.
“Coverage at the somewhat-selective institutions at which UC applicants tended to enroll was substantially higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among all applicants to any UC campus, URM applicants' admissions advantage over non-URM applicants fell from 9.3 to 1.4 percentage points.
“Among all applicants to any UC campus, URM applicants' admissions advantage over non-URM applicants (to be admitted to at least one campus) fell from 9.3 to 1.4 percentage points.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The more selective UC campuses saw sharp year-over-year declines in URM enrollment.
“and the more selective UC campuses also saw sharp year-over-year declines in URM enrollment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Some UC campuses saw relatively large declines in URM admission and enrollment likelihood between 1995 and 1996 relative to academically comparable non-URM applicants, particularly at UCLA and the less-selective UCs.
“FigureA-3 shows that some UC campuses saw relatively-large declines in URM admission and enrollment likelihood between 1995 and 1996 relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants (particularly at UCLA and the less-selective UCs)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
NSC routinely captures more than 90 percent of STEM degree attainment at all campuses throughout the period, conditional on degree reporting in both data sets.
“a comparison between NSC and UC major reporting (measured by which students earned STEM degrees) shows that NSC routinely captures more than 90 percent of STEM degree attainment at all campuses throughout the period (conditional on degree reporting in both data sets).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only UC Santa Cruz failed to report a substantial number of earned degrees among the late 1990s graduation cohorts.
“A comparison between UC and NSC graduation records suggests that only UC Santa Cruz failed to report a substantial number of earned degrees among the late 1990s graduation cohorts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VA estimates by quartile show that VA wage estimates generally poorly match the observed effects of Prop 209, with the true impact more widely distributed across the AI distribution than the expected effects based on changes in VA.
“the VA estimates by quartile show that the VA wage estimates generally poorly match the observed effects of Prop 209, with the true impact more widely distributed across the AI distribution than the expected effects based on changes in VA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
One-third of in-sample applicants within 400 AI of the threshold earned over $100,000 in their early 30s.
“with one-third of in-sample applicants (within 400 AI of the threshold) earning over $100,000 in their early 30s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
White and Asian UC applicants showed similar admissions trends after 1998.
“TableA-3 presents descriptive statistics for white and Asian UC applicants before and after Prop 209, with both showing similar admissions trends after 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The STEM performance and persistence of URM students across five UC campuses does not improve following Prop 209, despite those students' enrollment at less-selective campuses.
“Section 5 shows that the STEM performance and persistence of URM students across five UC campuses does not improve following Prop 209, despite those students' enrollment at less-selective campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Most UC campuses saw smaller declines in 1996 and large declines in 1998.
“Most campuses saw smaller declines in 1996 and large declines in 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The coefficients on Asian students' enrollment at more-selective and selective UC campuses are precisely-estimated zeroes.
“The coefficients on Asian students' enrollment at more-selective and selective UC campuses are precisely-estimated zeroes”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
URM applicants who were admitted to some UC campus became less likely to enroll at UC after Prop 209.
“though URM applicants who were admitted to some UC campus became less likely to enroll at UC”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is no estimated change in likelihood of California employment across the Berkeley access threshold.
“There is no estimated change in likelihood of California employment across the Berkeley access threshold”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Admitted URM applicants became more likely to enroll at every UC campus after Prop 209.
“Table A-5 shows that admitted URM applicants became more likely to enroll at every UC campus after Prop 209”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Applicants' number of early-30s years employed in California increases by 0.14 years (s.e. 0.17) across the Berkeley access threshold.
“applicants' number of early-30s years employed in California increases by 0.14 years (s.e.0.17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In 1998-99, of the 87 percent classified, whites and Asians make up 65 and 29 percent, while Hispanics and Blacks make up 4.2 and 1.3 percent.
“The URM shares are hardly higher in 1998-99; of the 87 percent classified, whites and Asians make up 65 and 29 percent, while Hispanics and Blacks make up 4.2 and 1.3 percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
No presented result changes statistically or qualitatively if predicted-URM applicants are re-assigned as URM.
“No presented result changes statistically or qualitatively if predicted-URM applicants are re-assigned as URM.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Using 1994-95 as an alternative baseline generally yields slightly larger estimates of Prop 209's effect.
“While I find that using 1994-95 as an alternative baseline generally yields slightly larger estimates of Prop 209's effect, URM students' outcomes largely decline in exactly 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Both value-added procedures understate selective universities' treatment effects among the URM students impacted by Prop 209.
“suggesting that both value-added procedures understate selective universities' treatment effects among the URM students impacted by Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Given that many URM applicants' undergraduate enrollment remained unchanged by Prop 209, the presented reduced-form coefficients likely underestimate impacted students' treatment effect of enrolling at less-selective universities after UC affirmative action ended.
“Given that many URM applicants' undergraduate enrollment remained unchanged by Prop 209, the presented reduced-form coefficients likely underestimate impacted students' treatment effect of enrolling at less-selective universities after UC affirmative action ended.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The baseline estimates are highly insensitive to a school-ethnicity-AI control function and other detailed socioeconomic and academic covariates, suggesting the absence of remaining bias.
“While this application deterrence could generate bias, I find that the baseline estimates are highly insensitive to both a school-ethnicity-AI control function (following Card and Rothstein (2007)) as well as other highlydetailed socioeconomic and academic covariates, suggesting the absence of remaining bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Card and Rothstein (2007) source
- Study design and conductreasoning
The estimates identify the impact of Prop 209 on URM student outcomes relative to its impact on non-URM outcomes.
“As a result, the estimates presented below identify the impact of Prop 209 on URM student outcomes relative to its impact on non-URM outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The value of selective public university access for on-the-margin non-URM students was small.
“This suggests that the value of selective public university access for on-themargin non-URM students was small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal, as much as 20 percent of the relative treatment effect estimates could be explained by improved outcomes among non-URM students who benefited from Prop 209.
“If universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal, this implies that as much as 20 percent of the relative treatment effect estimates described below could be explained by improved outcomes among non-URM students who benefited from Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal.
- Interpretationown data
Almost 80 percent of the deterred applicants would likely have been admitted to at least one UC campus.
“I find that UC annually received about 250 fewer Black and 900 fewer Hispanic applications after Prop 209, almost 80 percent of whom would likely have been admitted to at least one UC campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The research design spans outcomes for all UC applicants whether or not they ever enroll at a UC campus, helping to avoid sample selection bias from changes in UC student composition.
“A key feature of this research design is that it spans outcomes for all UC applicants whether or not they ever enroll at a UC campus.This helps to avoid concerns of sample selection bias that arise from changes in the UC student composition caused by UC's changed admissions policies following Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Two pieces of evidence favor affirmative action's Kaldor-Hicks efficiency.
“While affirmative action is unlikely to be Pareto efficient, two pieces of evidence favor its Kaldor-Hicks efficiency, which in this case requires (to a first-order approximation) that the benefit of more-selective university enrollment is greater for the URM enrollees targeted by affirmative action than for the non-URM students who would have enrolled in their place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
By the mid-2010s, Prop 209 had caused a cumulative decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.
“By the mid-2010s, Prop 209 had caused a cumulative decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
“Nevertheless, given the magnitude of UC's applicant pool, these estimates imply that by 2014, Prop 209 had caused an aggregate decline in the number of high-earning URM Californians in their early 30s by at least three percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · hedged
- Premisecitation
Proposition 209 banned race-based affirmative action at California public universities in 1998.
“Proposition 209 banned race-based affirmative action at California public universities in 1998.”
- Also stated in: § 1.1 University of California Admissions in the 1990s · plain
“Prop 209 has prohibited UC and other public institutions in California from”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Douglass, 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Also stated in: § 1.1 University of California Admissions in the 1990s · plain
- Study design and conductown data
The confidence intervals cannot rule out positive treatment effects for students just below Berkeley's admissions threshold.
“Employing a regression discontinuity design, I find that students just below Berkeley's admissions threshold nevertheless enrolled at similar-quality universities and ended up with similar educational and labor market outcomes, though the confidence intervals cannot rule out positive treatment effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The non-URM UC applicant group are not a traditional control group because they were also partly treated by Prop 209.
“However, the non-URM UC applicant group are not a traditional”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Affirmative action had proportional effects for Asian and white applicants.
“Compared to academicallycomparable white applicants, Asian applicants enrolled at similar universities and had indistinguishable long-run labor market outcomes after Prop 209, suggesting proportional effects of affirmative action for both groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Comparing outcomes of URM and non-URM applicants after 1998 accounts for substantial shifts in UC campuses' reputation and selectivity through the period.
“Comparing the outcomes of URM and non-URM applicants after 1998 accounts for the substantial shifts in UC campuses' reputation and selectivity through the period”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Affirmative action's net wage benefits for URM applicants exceed its net costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.
“Complementary regression discontinuity and institutional value-added analyses suggest that affirmative action's net wage benefits for URM applicants exceed its (potentially small) net costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Overall, the enrollment patterns are consistent with a substantial cascade of URM students from more- to less-selective universities after 1998.
“Overall, these patterns are consistent with a substantial cascade of URM students from more-to less-selective universities after 1998”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Barely-admitted non-URM students would have otherwise enrolled at similar-quality institutions and thus faced similar long-run outcomes.
“I also present local regression discontinuity evidence highlighting the importance of the counterfactual options available to near-threshold applicants; in UC Berkeley's case, it appears that barely-admitted non-URM students would have otherwise enrolled at similar-quality institutions and thus faced similar long-run outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Higher-AI URM applicants' increased enrollment at selective and less-selective campuses was likely a result of their now being rejected from the more-selective UC campuses.
“likely as a result of their now being rejected from the more-selective UC campuses”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Some non-URM applicants' likelihood of admission to more-selective universities likely increased in order to maintain class sizes despite the decline in URM enrollment.
“Some non-URM applicants' likelihood of admission to more-selective universities likely increased in order to maintain class sizes despite the decline in URM enrollment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premiseown data
UC's affirmative action policies provided admissions advantages to URM applicants that augmented campuses' standard admissions protocol.
“UC's affirmative action policies provided admissions advantages to URM applicants that augmented campuses' standard admissions protocol, which required that 50 percent of students be admitted solely based on their”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The increasing application and yield rates, lower admissions rate, and stronger academic preparedness of both applicant and admitted pools indicate a university system steadily increasing in reputation and selectivity throughout the 1990s.
“Taken together, the increasing application and yield rates, lower admissions rate, and stronger academic preparedness of both the applicant and admitted pools indicate a university system steadily increasing in reputation and selectivity throughout the 1990s.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Affirmative action is unlikely to be Pareto efficient.
“While affirmative action is unlikely to be Pareto efficient, two pieces of evidence favor its Kaldor-Hicks efficiency, which in this case requires (to a first-order approximation) that the benefit of more-selective university enrollment is greater for the URM enrollees targeted by affirmative action than for the non-URM students who would have enrolled in their place.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
This cascade explains why the proportion of each campus's URM applicants who enroll at that campus only declines at the three more-selective campuses.
“This cascade explains why the proportion of each campus's URM applicants who enroll at that campus only declines at the three more-selective campuses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
UC's school-specific outreach programs after 1998 wound down after 2001 with little evidence of success in increasing URM application rates.
“Starting in 1998, UC implemented costly school-specific outreach programs to increase enrollment from majority-URM high schools and communities, but those programs wound down after 2001 with little evidence of success in even increasing URM application rates (Atkinson and Pelfrey, 2004; UCOP, 2003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Atkinson and Pelfrey, 2004
- cites UCOP, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
These findings are inconsistent with the university 'Mismatch Hypothesis'.
“These findings are inconsistent with the university”
- Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
“A series of online appendices to this paper discuss the limitations of that previous research and reconcile their analysis with this study's baseline findings, which are inconsistent with widespread”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Abstract · plain
- Interpretationreasoning
UC's affirmative action provided substantial long-run wage returns to Hispanic students.
“this suggests that while UC's affirmative action provided substantial long-run wage returns to Hispanic students”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Assuming coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes, Prop 209 implies a decline in the number of high-earning URM Californians by over 700 (1,700).
“Assuming that these coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes, this implies a decline in the number of high-earning URM Californians by over 700 (1,700).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The difference-in-difference coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes.
- Interpretationreasoning
The overall decline in STEM attainment appears driven by students who exit these UC campuses following Prop 209.
“The overall decline in STEM attainment thus appears driven by students who exit these UC campuses following Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The previous section shows little evidence that expanding on-the-margin non-URM students' access to UC Berkeley provides economic benefits to those students.
“Second, the previous section shows little evidence that expanding onthe-margin non-URM students' access to UC Berkeley provides economic benefits to those students.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The baseline estimates are highly insensitive to alternative model specifications.
“These results show that the baseline estimates are highly insensitive to alternative model specifications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The presented estimates are reduced-form, averaging over many URM students who were likely unimpacted by the Prop 209 policy change, which means that they likely substantially underestimate the effect of Prop 209 on students whose enrollment was shifted by UC's policy change.
“The presented estimates are reduced-form, averaging over many URM students who were likely unimpacted by the Prop 209 policy change, which means that they likely substantially underestimate the effect of Prop 209 on students whose enrollment was shifted by UC's policy change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The absence of a clearly unimpacted comparison group challenges the use of the difference-in-difference research design to distinguish non-URM student effects from ancillary economic trends.
“the absence of a clearly unimpacted comparison group challenges the use of the difference-in-difference research design to distinguish non-URM student effects from ancillary economic trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The degree attainment of students targeted by affirmative action was relatively less sensitive to enrollment change.
“This suggests that the degree attainment of students targeted by affirmative action was relatively less sensitive to enrollment change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
UC's selectivity and the high wages earned by its graduates imply that its policies may meaningfully impact the composition of California's high-earning workers.
“its selectivity and the high wages earned by its graduates imply that its policies may meaningfully impact the composition of California's high-earning workers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Prop 209 caused a decline in the number of such workers among UC applicants by 3 (6) percent.
“implying that Prop 209 caused a decline in the number of such workers among UC applicants by 3 (6) percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is little reason to treat white and Asian applicants as having been differently-treated by Prop 209, conditional on prior academic opportunities and preparation as measured by the components of AI.
“I conclude that there is little reason to treat white and Asian applicants as having been differently-treated by Prop 209, conditional on prior academic opportunities and preparation as measured by the components of AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
If these estimated returns are externally valid for non-URM students who crowded into more-selective UC campuses following Prop 209, non-URM students faced minimal costs from UC's affirmative action policy.
“If these estimated returns are externally valid for the non-URM students who crowded into more-selective UC campuses following Prop 209, this implies that non-URM students faced minimal costs from UC's affirmative action policy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
On-the-margin non-URM students would have otherwise enrolled at similar-value institutions on average.
“However, those students would have otherwise enrolled at similar-value institutions on average”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The estimates omit labor market outcomes for (endogenously-selected) non-Californian and self-employed workers.
“The estimates also omit labor market outcomes for (endogenously-selected) non-Californian and self-employed workers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Selectivity differences between public research universities are at best a second-order determinant of URM students' persistence and performance in STEM courses, providing little support for the STEM Mismatch Hypothesis in this context.
“These findings suggest that selectivity differences between public research universities are at best a second-order determinant of URM students' persistence and performance in STEM courses, providing little support for the STEM Mismatch Hypothesis in this context.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The baseline estimates' focus on UC applicants may yield an underestimate of the aggregate labor market effect of Prop 209 for high earners.
“This suggests that the baseline estimates' focus on UC applicants may yield an underestimate of the aggregate labor market effect of Prop 209 for high earners”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation
The primary potential threat to the presented research design is that Prop 209 may have dissuaded some URM high school graduates from sending an application to any UC campus, which could generate sample selection bias in the baseline difference-in-difference estimates.
“The primary potential threat to the presented research design is that Prop 209 may have dissuaded some URM high school graduates from sending an application to any UC campus -the main estimation sample -which could generate sample selection bias in the baseline difference-in-difference estimates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Three pieces of evidence suggest that the return to more-selective university enrollment is relatively smaller for non-URM students who enroll at more-selective universities only absent affirmative action.
“three pieces of evidence suggest that the return to more-selective university enrollment is relatively smaller for the non-URM students who enroll at more-selective universities only absent affirmative action.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These three sets of evidence provide suggestive support for the Kaldor-Hicks efficiency of California's pre-1998 affirmative action policies.
“These three sets of evidence provide suggestive support for the Kaldor-Hicks efficiency of California's pre-1998 affirmative action policies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
There is substantial heterogeneity between and within disciplines in changes in URM UC applicants' fields of study.
“suggesting substantial heterogeneity between and within disciplines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The variation in URM wages after 1996 is more likely the result of ethnicity-specific wage dynamics in the California labor market than of early affirmative action phase-out.
“While the former may partly reflect some UC campuses' early affirmative action phase-out, this variation is more likely the result of ethnicity-specific wage dynamics in the California labor market.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Students' STEM performance, persistence, and degree attainment appear largely explained by compositional differences in prior academic opportunity and preparedness, which are determined before they arrive at university.
“Instead, students' STEM performance, persistence, and degree attainment appear largely explained by compositional differences in prior academic opportunity and preparedness, which are determined before they arrive at university.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
UC does not educate enough of the California workforce for its admissions policies to meaningfully shift most moments of the state's aggregate wage distribution.
“While the University of California does not educate enough of the California workforce for its admissions policies to meaningfully shift most moments of the state's aggregate wage distribution”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The estimates omit the impacts of Prop 209 on URM Californians dissuaded from UC application by Prop 209, who may also have previously benefited from UC affirmative action.
“They omit the impacts of Prop 209 on URM Californians dissuaded from UC application by Prop 209, who may also have previously benefited from UC affirmative action.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
No previous study had directly examined the impact of affirmative action on URM students' actual course performance and STEM course progression, instead focusing on overall grade point averages and major choice.
“However, no previous study has directly examined the impact of affirmative action on URM students' actual course performance and STEM course progression, instead focusing on overall grade point averages and major choice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
UC's affirmative action's labor market benefits to Black Californians may have been small.
“its labor market benefits to Black Californians may have been small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Assuming that the presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities, the wage effect of more-selective university enrollment for students impacted by affirmative action is significantly larger than universities' average treatment effect.
“Assuming that the presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities, this suggests that the wage effect of more-selective university enrollment for the students impacted by affirmative action is significantly larger than universities' average treatment effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The difference-in-difference research design cannot separately identify the impact of Prop 209 on non-URM UC applicants, some of whom may have benefited from the policy change by enrolling at more-selective universities.
“The difference-in-difference research design discussed above cannot separately identify the impact of Prop 209 on non-URM UC applicants, some of whom may have benefited from the policy change as a result of enrolling at more-selective universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Race-based affirmative action decreases non-URM student enrollment for each net additional URM student that it causes to enroll.
“Race-based affirmative action decreases non-URM student enrollment for each net additional URM student that it causes to enroll.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Differential NSC non-reporting by URM applicants is unlikely to explain the observed degree attainment patterns.
“As a result, differential NSC non-reporting by URM applicants is unlikely to explain the observed degree attainment patterns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Ending UC's affirmative action program did not lead to an increase in Asian UC applicants' enrollment at more-selective and selective UC campuses.
“Ending UC's affirmative action program did not lead to an increase in Asian UC applicants' enrollment at those campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The models do not control for family income or other measures of pre-college opportunity likely correlated with URM status.
“these models do not control for family income or other measures of pre-college opportunity likely correlated with URM status.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since those factors remained part of UC admissions, it is unsurprising that the presented models still identify advantages for URM applicants despite Prop 209.
“Since those factors remained part of UC admissions, it is unsurprising that the presented models still identify advantages for URM applicants despite Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The six-year graduation and STEM major choice estimates presented in Panel A of Table 3 are robust when restricted to NSC records only or to NSC records augmented by only UCSC degrees.
“The six-year graduation and STEM major choice estimates presented in Panel A of Table 3 are robust when restricted to NSC records only or to NSC records augmented by only UCSC degrees”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Some 1990s NSC records are incomplete.
“Some 1990s NSC records are incomplete”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Presented value-added statistics remain somewhat biased by positive selection into more-selective universities, suggesting they relatively overestimate differences between universities.
“there is reason to believe that the presented value-added statistics remain somewhat biased by positive selection into more-selective universities, suggesting that they relatively overestimate differences between universities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Since UC enrollment declined after Prop 209, augmenting incomplete NSC records with UC records could bias estimates of the impact of Prop 209 on degree attainment toward 0.
“Since UC enrollment declined after Prop 209, this could bias estimates of the impact of Prop 209 on degree attainment toward 0.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: UC enrollment declined after Prop 209.
- May combine two claims. 53
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe distribution of applicants is smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold, with the McCrary test yielding a p-value of 0.58, and baseline characteristics are also smooth across the threshold.
“The distribution of applicants is smooth across the threshold, with the McCrary (2008) test yielding a p-value of 0.58 at the threshold.Baseline characteristics are also smooth across the threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites McCrary (2008) source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins.
“increased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites Arcidiacono, Aucejo, and Hotz, 2016 source
The Conclusion reports lower science graduation rates for less-prepared students at more selective UC campuses. But it also finds that more selective campuses have an advantage in graduating better-prepared science students, so the claim is too broad when applied to students generally. The supplied passages do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Mountjoy and Hickman, 2020 source
- cites Bleemer, 2018a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompared to academically-comparable white applicants, Asian applicants enrolled at similar universities and had indistinguishable long-run labor market outcomes after Prop 209.
“Compared to academicallycomparable white applicants, Asian applicants enrolled at similar universities and had indistinguishable long-run labor market outcomes after Prop 209, suggesting proportional effects of affirmative action for both groups.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost UC campuses continued providing large admissions advantages to URM applicants in 1996 and 1997, but those advantages shrank considerably in 1998.
“Figure 1 shows that most campuses continued providing large admissions advantages to URM applicants in 1996 and 1997 (though UCLA, Irvine, and Santa Cruz curtailed their programs), but those advantages shrank considerably in 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningAfter Prop 209, high-AI URM applicants tended to flow from UC's more-selective campuses to less-selective campuses and elite private universities, while lower-AI URM applicants mostly flowed to less-selective California colleges and universities.
“After Prop 209, high-AI URM applicants tended to flow from UC's more-selective campuses to less-selective campuses and -especially among Black applicants -elite private universities, while lower-AI URM applicants mostly flowed to less-selective California colleges and universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFigure 4 shows six-year BA attainment among bottom-AI-quartile applicants, unconditional STEM degree attainment, and graduate degree attainment all abruptly and persistently decline in 1998 following Prop 209.
“Figure 4 presents estimates from Equation 1 for six-year BA attainment among bottom-AI-quartile applicants, unconditional STEM degree attainment, and graduate degree attainment, showing that all three abruptly and persistently decline in 1998 following Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe institutions where URM UC applicants enrolled remained relatively steady in CFSTY early-30s annual wage value-added between 1995 and 1997, but sharply and persistently declined by about $1,000 after 1998.
“Figure 4 shows that the institutions where URM UC applicants enrolled remained relatively steady in terms of their”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAverage SAT scores of students admitted to each UC campus steadily rose during the period.
“as were the average scores of students admitted to each campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMuch of the graduate degree decline was in STEM fields.
“Prop 209 also caused a 1.3 percentage point decline in each URM applicant's likelihood of earning a graduate degree, with much of that decline in STEM fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProp 209 curbed the large admissions advantages provided to all URM UC applicants by affirmative action, with many URM applicants becoming 50 percentage points less likely to earn admission to UC's most selective campuses relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.
“Prop 209 curbed the large admissions advantages provided to all underrepresented minority (URM) UC applicants by affirmative action, with many URM applicants becoming 50 percentage points less likely to earn admission to UC's most selective campuses relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudents just below Berkeley's admissions threshold nevertheless enrolled at similar-quality universities and ended up with similar educational and labor market outcomes.
“Employing a regression discontinuity design, I find that students just below Berkeley's admissions threshold nevertheless enrolled at similar-quality universities and ended up with similar educational and labor market outcomes, though the confidence intervals cannot rule out positive treatment effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationAlmost 20 percent of UC applicants were URM in 1997.
“Almost 20 percent of UC applicants were URM in 1997”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBefore Prop 209, URM UC students earned lower grades and were less likely to persist along introductory STEM course sequences than their non-URM peers.
“While I find that before Prop 209 URM UC students earned lower grades and were less likely to persist along introductory STEM course sequences than their non-URM peers, these gaps are largely explained by students' prior academic opportunities and preparedness, not their enrollment institution.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataURM applicants' wages sharply decline between 1997 and 1998, reflecting the impact of Prop 209, but there is also evidence of a decline after 1996 and continued declines between 1998 and 2000.
“URM applicants' wages sharply decline between 1997 and 1998, reflecting the impact of Prop 209, but there is also evidence of a decline after 1996 and continued declines between 1998 and 2000.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo further combination of detailed control functions and covariates meaningfully changes any of the beta 98-99 estimates, except the six-year degree attainment measure grows slightly more negative.
“there is no further combination of these highly-detailed control functions and covariates that meaningfully changes any of the 𝛽𝛽 98-99 estimates, with the exception of the six-year degree attainment measure growing slightly more negative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataURM enrollees' STEM performance and persistence were unchanged when their class rank improved; the 95 percent confidence interval around the estimated change in STEM persistence narrowly bounds 0, from -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, small relative to the raw STEM persistence ethnicity gap of 11.2 percentage points before Prop 209.
“URM enrollees STEM performance and persistence were unchanged when their class rank improved; the 95 percent confidence interval around the estimated change in STEM persistence narrowly bounds 0, from -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, small effects relative to the raw STEM persistence ethnicity gap of 11.2 percentage points before Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBefore Prop 209, Berkeley's URM students earned lower average grades by 0.77 grade points and were 19 percentage points less likely to persist along STEM course sequences.
“The last column of Table A-18 shows that before Prop 209, Berkeley's URM students earned lower average grades by 0.77 grade points and were 19 percentage points less likely to persist along STEM course sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProp 209 led URM students to enroll at universities with lower early-30s wage value-added by as much as $1,000, while those students' actual early-30s annual wages fell by more than $2,000.
“While Prop 209 led URM students to enroll at universities with lower early-30s wage value-added by as much as $1,000, those students' actual early-30s annual wages fell by more than $2,000 (see Tables 2 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProp 209 led Berkeley's (higher-testing) URM students to earn slightly higher STEM grades (by 0.14 grade points), but if anything their STEM persistence slightly declined.
“In fact, Prop 209 does lead Berkeley's (higher-testing) URM students to earn slightly higher STEM grades (by 0.14 grade points), but if anything their STEM persistence slightly declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenURM UC applicants' university enrollment sharply shifted away from UC's more-selective Berkeley and UCLA campuses, causing a cascade of students to enroll at lower-quality public institutions and some private universities.
“URM UC applicants' university enrollment sharply shifted away from UC's more-selective Berkeley and UCLA campuses, causing a cascade of students to enroll at lower-quality public institutions and some private universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of the on-the-margin non-URM students would likely have otherwise enrolled at UCLA or UCSD (6.1 percentage points, s.e. 3.5) or out-of-state universities (8.0 percentage points, s.e. 3.4).
“Most of the students would likely have otherwise enrolled at UCLA or UCSD (6.1 percentage points, s.e.3.5) or out-of-state universities (8.0 percentage points, s.e.3.4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProp 209 failed to increase URM UC applicants' likelihood of earning a STEM degree and led to the opposite effect.
“Complementing the previous section's finding that Prop 209 failed to increase URM UC applicants' likelihood of earning a STEM degree -indeed, it led to the opposite effect”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGraduate school enrollment, early-30s wages, and the number of years spent earning over $150,000 per year are smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold.
“Panels (d) to ( f) of Figure 10 show that graduate school enrollment, early-30s wages, and the number of years spent by each applicant in their early 30s earning over $150,000 per year are smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Findingnone givenUC had 56,300 URM applicants between 1998 and 2002.
“UC had 56,300 URM applicants between 1998 and 2002.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAbout 80 percent of URM UC applicants were Hispanic, and those applicants received the full observed wage benefits of UC affirmative action policies.
“About 80 percent of URM UC applicants were Hispanic, and those applicants received the full observed wage benefits of UC affirmative action policies,”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningPoorer educational outcomes contributed to a five percent average annual decline in applicants' wages throughout their 20s and early 30s, which resulted in a decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.
“These poorer educational outcomes in turn contributed to a five percent average annual decline in applicants' wages throughout their 20s and early 30s, which resulted in a decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhile Black and Hispanic UC applicants faced similar declines in university quality and educational outcomes after Prop 209, and Hispanic UC applicants' wages and wage percentile sharply declined after 1998, there was no observable parallel decline among Black UC applicants.
“While Black and Hispanic UC applicants faced similar declines in university quality and educational outcomes after Prop 209, and Hispanic UC applicants' wages and wage percentile sharply declined after 1998, there was no observable parallel decline among Black UC applicants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSingle-difference estimates show that non-URM wage outcomes are notably smooth in the years before and after Prop 209, while URM wage outcomes sharply and persistently decline in 1998.
“First, single-difference estimates of the baseline outcomes show that non-URM wage outcomes are notably smooth in the years before and after Prop 209, while URM wage outcomes sharply and persistently decline in 1998 (see Figure A-13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe number of Black and Hispanic UC applicants declined by 12-13 percent (about 1,200 per year) after Prop 209, most of whom would have likely been admitted to some UC campus.
“The sum across the scaled statistics suggests that the number of Black and Hispanic UC applicants declined by 12-13 percent (about 1,200 per year), most of whom would have likely been admitted to some UC campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIncluding either p statistic as a covariate in Equation 1 yields statistically-significant negative coefficients, implying negative selection out of UC application, while their inverse mills ratios yield significant positive coefficients.
“As expected, including either of these p statistics as covariates in Equation 1 yields statistically-significant negative coefficients (implying negative selection out of UC application), while their inverse mills ratios yield significant positive coefficients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe relative decline in URM performance is driven by URM students in the bottom two terciles of SAT scores, with no observed declines among high-or low-GPA high-SAT students.
“This hypothesis is supported by the finding that the relative decline in URM performance is driven by URM students in the bottom two terciles of SAT scores, with no observed declines among high-or low-GPA high-SAT students (see Table A -19).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataProp 209 caused URM students to enroll in STEM courses in which their average SAT percentile was about four percentage points higher, closing that gap by more than half.
“The first panel of Figure 9 shows that Prop 209 caused URM students to enroll in STEM courses in which their average SAT percentile was about four percentage points higher, closing that gap by more than half.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pre-Prop 209 gaps in URM STEM grades and persistence are fully explained by URM enrollees' poorer prior academic opportunity and preparedness; their performance and persistence was indistinguishable from academically-comparable non-URM students across the five UC campuses.
“These gaps are fully explained by URM enrollees' poorer prior academic opportunity and preparedness; their performance and persistence was indistinguishable from those of academically-comparable non-URM students across the five UC campuses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThough Black UC applicants faced a decline in degree attainment after Prop 209, their early-career wages were not observably impacted.
“Though Black UC applicants faced a decline in degree attainment after Prop 209, their early-career wages were not observably impacted.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNot every UC-eligible applicant was admitted to a UC campus; many were rejected from each campus to which they applied.
“Not every UC-eligible applicant was admitted to a UC campus; many were rejected from each campus to which they applied”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenWhite and Asian students were proportionally impacted by Prop 209, with no evidence of disparate impacts for one or the other.
“White and Asian students were proportionally impacted by Prop 209, with no evidence of disparate impacts for one or the other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataURM applicants faced similar-magnitude declines in admissions likelihood at San Diego and Davis, and their admissions advantage fell at every UC campus.
“URM applicants faced similar-magnitude declines in their admissions likelihood at San Diego and Davis, and their admissions advantage fell at every campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationConditioning on the set of UC campuses to which applicants were admitted flips the sign of the UC-wide coefficient to 2.8 percentage points; compared to academically-similar students admitted to the same UC campuses, post-1998 URM students are more likely to enroll at some UC campus.
“conditioning on the set of UC campuses to which applicants were admitted flips the sign of the UC-wide coefficient (to 2.8 percentage points); compared to academically-similar students admitted to the same UC campuses, post-1998 URM students are more likely to enroll at some UC campus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAdmissions and enrollment statistics are slightly larger when estimated relative to the 1994-95 baseline.
“Admissions and enrollment statistics are slightly larger when estimated relative to the 1994-95 baseline”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnder AA, URM applicants were 37 percentage points more likely than comparable non-URM applicants to be admitted to Berkeley and 27 percentage points more likely at UCLA.
“While URM applicants were 37 and 27 percentage points more likely than comparable non-URM applicants to be admitted to Berkeley and UCLA under AA”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe difference in R2 between admission regressions with and without ethnicity was about 0.25 at UCLA in 1994-95, 0.15 in 1996-97, and less than 0.05 after 1998.
“Figure A-4 shows, for example, that the difference was about 0.25 at UCLA in 1994-95, 0.15 in 1996-97, and less than 0.05 after 1998.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach model includes components used to construct UC's Academic Index, which absorb variation in applicants' observed academic preparedness.
“and the components used to construct UC's Academic Index (𝑋𝑋 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ), which absorb variation in applicants' observed academic preparedness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUC's primary policy response to the end of affirmative action was its Eligibility in the Local Context top percent policy, which did not begin until 2001.
“Instead, UC's primary policy response to the end of affirmative action was its Eligibility in the Local Context top percent policy, which did not begin until 2001 (Bleemer, 2019a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bleemer, 2019a
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningURM students from more-selective schools took the less-selective university seats previously held by lower-AI URM students rejected in the absence of affirmative action, who themselves took the seats of other URM students who formerly enrolled at even less-selective universities.
“with URM students from more-selective schools taking the less-selective university seats previously held by lower-AI URM students rejected in the absence of affirmative action, who themselves take the seats of other URM students who formerly enrolled at even less-selective universities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenEach model includes high school fixed effects, which absorb spurious cross-school application and outcome variation.
“Each model includes high school fixed effects 𝛼𝛼 ℎ 𝑖𝑖 , which absorb spurious cross-school application and outcome variation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIf UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209, every one percentage point average decrease in URM applicants' enrollment likelihood corresponds to almost a 0.25 percentage point average increase in non-URM applicants' enrollment likelihood.
“if UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209, every one percentage point average decrease in URM applicants' enrollment likelihood corresponds to almost a 0.25 percentage point average increase in non-URM applicants' enrollment likelihood.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningIt remains possible that the beta estimates reflect sample selection bias resulting from the impact of Prop 209 on the composition of UC applicants.
“It remains possible that the 𝛽𝛽 𝑖𝑖 estimates reflect sample selection bias resulting from the impact of Prop 209 on the composition of UC applicants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenNo UC campus implemented any substantial unrelated changes in their admissions processes in this period.
“No UC campus implemented any substantial unrelated changes in their admissions processes in this period.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPareto efficiency is very unlikely in this context, because even a single non-URM student benefiting from more-selective enrollment as a result of Prop 209 would prove the policy's inefficiency.
“While Pareto efficiency is very unlikely in this context -even a single non-URM student benefiting from more-selective enrollment as a result of Prop 209 would prove the policy's inefficiency”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn 1996 and 1997 Berkeley guaranteed admission to applicants above an annually-determined AI threshold, and admissions officers admitted some lower-AI applicants based on other application characteristics.
“In 1996 and 1997 Berkeley guaranteed admission to applicants above an annually-determined AI threshold.77 Admissions officers then admitted some lower-AI applicants based on other application characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [77]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningApplicants near Berkeley's admissions threshold are quasi-randomly located on one or the other side of the threshold, differentiated by small test score or grade differences, so outcome differences on either side are interpreted as resulting from above-threshold applicants' greater access to UC Berkeley.
“Because applicants near Berkeley's admissions threshold are quasi-randomly located on one or the other side of the threshold, differentiated by small test score or grade differences, I interpret outcome differences on either side of the threshold as resulting from the above-threshold applicants' greater access to UC Berkeley.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe gap in wage outcomes may be partially explained by positively-selected Black students' greater likelihood of exiting California to enroll at Ivy+ and other highly-selective private universities.
“While gap may be partially explained by positively-selected Black students' greater likelihood of exiting California to enroll at Ivy+ and other highly-selective private universities”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataSAT scores are relatively negatively-biased measures of low-testing URM students' academic preparedness, such that Berkeley's selection away from those students causes a decline in URM enrollees' relative overperformance.
“An alternative hypothesis is that SAT scores are relatively negatively-biased measures of low-testing URM students' academic preparedness, such that Berkeley's selection away from those students causes a decline in URM enrollees' relative overperformance (Vars and Bowen, 1998; Niu and Tienda, 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Vars and Bowen, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Niu and Tienda, 2010
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImpacted non-URM students already had access to similar-quality universities even without broader UC admissions, and their more-selective enrollment following Prop 209 had relatively small long-run effects on their economic outcomes.
“diverse evidence suggest that those impacted non-URM students -whose more-selective university enrollment increased following Prop 209 -already had access to similar-quality universities even without broader UC admissions, and that their more-selective enrollment following Prop 209 had relatively small long-run effects on their economic outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFew remaining unobservables could contribute to selection bias, and the magnitude of remaining bias is very likely small.
“There are few remaining unobservables that could contribute to selection bias in this case -while applicants' academic, demographic, and socioeconomic status and cross-school application behavior are observed in detail, orthogonal dimensions of their high school leadership activities remain unobserved -and it appears very likely that the magnitude of remaining bias is small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis study documents the meaningful potential of affirmative action policies to promote economic mobility in the US, though perhaps not to close white-black mobility gaps, and the consequences of the policies' prohibition.
“Nevertheless, this study documents the meaningful potential of affirmative action policies to promote economic mobility in the US -though perhaps not to close white-black mobility gaps -and the consequences of the policies' prohibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningBerkeley chose its annual threshold so that 50 percent of its admitted applicants had AI above the threshold, and the threshold could not be chosen until after Berkeley observed all applicants' AIs, prohibiting applicants from manipulating their AI to exceed the threshold.
“Berkeley chose its annual threshold so that 50 percent of its admitted applicants had AI above the threshold.As a result, the threshold could not be chosen until after Berkeley observed all applicants' AIs, prohibiting applicants from manipulating their AI to exceed the threshold (as occurred at UC Davis, another institution with a contemporaneous admissions threshold).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTargeted URM students received substantially above-average wage returns to more-selective university enrollment under affirmative action, and thus faced disproportionate declines after Prop 209.
“The targeted URM students, on the other hand, received substantially above-average wage returns to more-selective university enrollment under affirmative action, and thus faced disproportionate declines after Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOn-the-margin non-URM students have access to alternative similar-value universities, and switching enrollment to UC Berkeley provides little measurable long-run economic return.
“the observed effects suggest that on-themargin non-URM students have access to alternative similar-value universities, and switching enrollment to UC Berkeley provides little measurable long-run economic return.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese results strikingly differ from several existing estimates of the impact of affirmative action, even those focusing on Prop 209's effect at the University of California, and highlight the importance of high-quality and detailed administrative data and a transparent research design to account for sample selection and omitted variable bias.
“These results strikingly differ from several existing estimates of the impact of affirmative action, even those focusing on Prop 209's effect at the University of California, and highlight the importance of high-quality and detailed administrative data and a transparent research design to account for sample selection and omitted variable bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe concern about NSC non-reporting does not extend to the graduate degree estimates; most such degrees are not earned at the same institutions where applicants earned their undergraduate degrees, and NSC coverage was very wide by the time applicants in the sample were earning graduate degrees.
“Moreover, this concern does not extend to the graduate degree estimates; most such degrees are not earned at the same institutions where applicants earned their undergraduate degrees, and NSC coverage was very wide by the time applicants in the sample were earning graduate degrees.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe two lines in Figure A-14 poorly mirror each other, suggesting VA poorly explains and substantially underestimates the observed labor market effects of Prop 209.
“The two lines poorly mirror each other, suggesting both that VA poorly-explains and substantially underestimates the observed labor market effects of Prop 209.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataAmong UC enrollees, the verified social security number differs from that reported on their application in fewer than 0.25 percent of cases.
“Among enrollees, the verified social security number differs from that reported on their application in fewer than 0.25 percent of cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenGrades may differ across classes as a result of grade inflation, but the analysis cannot separately identify inflation from actual differences in mean cross-class performance differences.
“Grades may differ across classes as a result of grade inflation, but I cannot separately identify inflation from actual differences in mean crossclass performance differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationAll employment results are replicated from institutional research conducted at the UC Office of the President.
“All employment results are replicated from institutional research conducted at the UC Office of the President”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bleemer (2019b)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSocial security numbers on UC applications are not verified unless the student enrolls at a UC campus.
“Social security numbers on UC applications are not verified unless the student enrolls at a UC campus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNational NSC enrollment coverage at four-year institutions was below 50 percent in 1996, rising to over 80 percent by 2000.
“Dynarski, Hemelt, and Hyman (2015) show that national NSC enrollment coverage at four-year institutions was below 50 percent in 1996, rising to over 80 percent by 2000.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dynarski, Hemelt, and Hyman (2015)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataAbout nine percent of near-threshold students have no observed four-year enrollment, with only one percent enrolling at a community college but no four-year institution within six years.
“About nine percent of near-threshold students have no observed four-year enrollment, with only one percent enrolling at a community college but no four-year institution within six years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataFamily income is not reported by about 15 percent of UC applicants.
“Family income is not reported by about 15 percent of applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning$150,000 is a better indicator of unusually high earnings, achieved in an average 0.60 out of 5 years for in-sample applicants.
“$150,000 is a better indicator of unusually high earnings, achieved in an average 0.60 out of 5 years for in-sample applicants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Non-URM applicants can serve as a valid control group for URM applicants after Prop 209, despite potential crowd-in effects.
“Non-URM applicants may not represent a traditional”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many URM UC applicants would have enrolled at the same institution whether or not affirmative action was operative.
“These estimated effects are averaged across every URM UC applicant, many of whom likely would have enrolled at the same institution whether or not affirmative action was operative.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The true distribution of AI across school-year-ethnicity cohorts remains unchanged over time.
“implicitly assuming that the true distribution of AI across school-year-ethnicity cohorts remains unchanged over time.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The difference-in-difference coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes.
“Assuming that these coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.
“Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal.
“If universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Prop 209's monotonicity holds.
“assuming Prop 209's monotonicity”
The authors state this as an assumption.
UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209.
“if UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.
“Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities.
“Assuming that the presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities”
The paper relies on this without support.
About one-third of UC students transfer from community colleges rather than applying as freshmen.
“About one-third of UC students transfer from community colleges rather than applying as freshmen.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Missing-ethnicity applicants are non-URM.
“These results justify the assumption in the baseline analysis that missing-ethnicity applicants are non-URM.”
The paper relies on this without support.
UC enrollment declined after Prop 209.
“Since UC enrollment declined after Prop 209”
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779 · see citing works
Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test,
McCrary, J. (2008) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005 · Cited by 3,600 · see citing works
Robust nonparametric confidence intervals for regression-discontinuity designs
Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Titiunik, R. (2014) · Econometrica · doi:10.3982/ecta11757 · Cited by 3,036 · see citing works
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20150572 · Cited by 2,315 · see citing works
When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering?
Abadie, A., Athey, S. C., Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2017) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24003 · Cited by 1,347 · see citing works
Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935089 · Cited by 995 · see citing works
Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big Are They and How Much Do We Know Thus Far?
Sacerdote, B. (2011) · Handbook of the economics of education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53429-3.00004-1 · Cited by 875 · see citing works
Ability sorting and the returns to college major
Arcidiacono, P. S. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.010 · Cited by 851 · see citing works
Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: an Intergenerational Perspective*
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz042 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjv036 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
The Effect of Attending the Flagship State University on Earnings: A Discontinuity-Based Approach
Hoekstra, M. (2009) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.4.717 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement
Carrell, S., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. E. (2009) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/600143 · Cited by 567 · see citing works
Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2011) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.3.3.158 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States: An Intergenerational Perspective
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Jones, M. R., & Porter, S. R. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24441 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
Holzer, H. J., & Neumark, D. (1999) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.38.3.483 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Racial Segregation and the Black-White Test Score Gap,
Card, D., & Rothstein, J. (2007) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.03.006 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States*
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Saez, E., Turner, N., & Yagan, D. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa005 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Cohodes, S. R., & Goodman, J. S. (2014) · American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.6.4.251 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
The Returns to College Admission for Academically Marginal Students
Zimmerman, S. (2014) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/676661 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Alon, S., & Tienda, M. (2005) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/003804070507800402 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Elite Colleges and Upward Mobility to Top Jobs and Top Incomes
Zimmerman, S. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20171019 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Hinrichs, P. (2012) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00170 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
Affirmative action in education: Evidence from engineering college admissions in India
Bertrand, M., Hanna, R., & Mullainathan, S. (2009) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.11.003 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Dale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2014) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1353/jhr.2014.0015 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Arcidiacono, P. S. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00627.x · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Billings, S. B., Deming, D. J., & Rockoff, J. E. (2013) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjt026 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Does Affirmative Action Work? Caste, Gender, College Quality, and Academic Success in India
Bagde, S., Epple, D. N., & Taylor, L. J. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20140783 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Minimum Wages and Racial Inequality*
Derenoncourt, E., & Montialoux, C. (2020) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaa031 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
University Differences in the Graduation of Minorities in STEM Fields: Evidence from California
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E. M., & Hotz, V. J. (2016) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20130626 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2005) · Industrial and Labor Relations Review · doi:10.1177/001979390505800306 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Marshall, G. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203161739-11 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Affirmative Action and the Quality–Fit Trade-off
Arcidiacono, P. S., & Lovenheim, M. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.1.3 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Does Banning Affirmative Action Lower College Student Quality?
Chan, J. T. S., & Eyster, E. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322157124 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E. M., & Spenner, K. (2012) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-1-5 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The Analysis of Field Choice in College and Graduate School: Determinants and Wage Effects
Altonji, J. G., Arcidiacono, P. S., & Maurel, A. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21655 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
College applications and the effect of affirmative action
Long, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.001 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The Analysis of Field Choice in College and Graduate School
Altonji, J. G., Arcidiacono, P. S., & Maurel, A. (2016) · Handbook of the economics of education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63459-7.00007-5 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Dickson, L. M. (2005) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.11.005 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-5883 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Backes, B. (2012) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.1353/jhr.2012.0013 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Racial Segregation and the Black-White Test Score Gap
Card, D., & Rothstein, J. (2006) · doi:10.3386/w12078 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
The Consequences of Academic Match between Students and Colleges
Dillon, E. W., & Smith, J. A. (2019) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.55.3.0818-9702r1 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
How Costly Is Affirmative Action? Government Contracting and California's Proposition 209
Marion, J. G. (2009) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.91.3.503 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Does Your Cohort Matter? Measuring Peer Effects in College Achievement
Carrell, S., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14032 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Ehrenberg, R. G. (2010) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.06.012 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
State Merit Aid Programs and College Major: A Focus on STEM
Sjoquist, D. L., & Winters, J. V. (2015) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/681108 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Affirmative action and university fit: evidence from Proposition 209
Arcidiacono, P., Aucejo, E., Coate, P., & Hotz, V. J. (2014) · IZA Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1186/2193-8997-3-7 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION IN HIGHER EDUCATION
(2000) · University Press of Kansas eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1jd94rn.5 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
The Returns to Elite University Education: a Quasi-Experimental Analysis
Anelli, M. (2020) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvz070 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
The Labor Market Returns to Advanced Degrees
Altonji, J. G., & Zhong, L. (2020) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/710959 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Blume, G. H., & Long, M. C. (2013) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/0162373713508810 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Card, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2004) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w10366 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Black, S., Denning, J. T., & Rothstein, J. M. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26821 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Affirmative Action in Higher Education
Orlans, H. (1992) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716292523001013 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Affirmative Action Bans and the "Chilling Effect"
Antonovics, K., & Sander, R. H. (2013) · American Law and Economics Review · doi:10.1093/aler/ahs020 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Black Education-Myths and Tragedies
Spratlin, T. H., & Sowell, T. (1973) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.2307/2967018 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Castleman, B., Long, B. T., & Mabel, Z. (2017) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22039 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
The Returns to College(s): Relative Value-Added and Match Effects in Higher Education
Mountjoy, J., & Hickman, B. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3537773 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Denning, J. T., & Turley, P. (2016) · The Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.52.1.0414-6340r1 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Affirmative Action in Higher Education.
Yocom, D. J. (1988) · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Antonovics, K., & Backes, B. (2013) · Education Finance and Policy · doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00090 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Barrow, L., Sartain, L., & de la Torre, M. (2020) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20170599 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
College Major Restrictions and Student StratificationPreprint
Bleemer, Z., & Mehta, A. S. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3981921 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationAsian American Discrimination in Harvard Admissions
Arcidiacono, P. S., Kinsler, J., & Ransom, T. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27068 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Robinson, N. L. (2003) · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Supply vs. demand under an affirmative action ban: Estimates from UC law schools
Yagan, D. (2016) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.02.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Affirmative Action and the Quality-Fit Tradeoff
Arcidiacono, P. S., & Lovenheim, M. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w20962 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Health Effects of Cesarean Delivery for Low-Risk First Births
Card, D., Fenizia, A., & Silver, D. W. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24493 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
(2004) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The Labor Market Returns to Advanced Degrees
Altonji, J. G., & Zhong, L. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w26959 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Top Percent Policies and the Return to Postsecondary SelectivityPreprint
Bleemer, Z. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3272618 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationThe UC Cliometric History Project and Formatted Optical Character RecognitionPreprint
Bleemer, Z. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3240266 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationDiversity in University Admissions: Affirmative Action, Percent Plans, and Holistic ReviewPreprint
Bleemer, Z. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3399166 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationBleemer, Z. (2021) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/x0njlx · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationBleemer, Z. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3399167
Self-citationRuggles, S., & Sobek, M. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Gerontology and Population Aging · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69892-2_980-1
Backes, B. (2012) · Journal of Human Resources · doi:10.3368/jhr.47.2.435
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Johnson, 2019, Children of the Dream: Why School Integration Works
- Juhn, 1991), Accounting for the Slowdown in Black-White Wage Convergence, 107
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chetty, R., Deming, D. J., & Friedman, J. N. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31492 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Bleemer, Z., & Mehta, A. S. (2022) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20200447 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationLy, D. P., Essien, U. R., Olenski, A. R., & Jena, A. B. (2022) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m21-4312 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The Costs of Employment Segregation: Evidence from the Federal Government Under Woodrow Wilson
Aneja, A., & Xu, G. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab040 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Black, S. E., Denning, J. T., & Rothstein, J. M. (2022) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20200137 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Matching in the Dark? Inequalities in Student to Degree Match
Campbell, S., Macmillan, L., Murphy, R., & Wyness, G. (2021) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/718433 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Chetty, R., Deming, D. J., & Friedman, J. N. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf050 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Racial, Ethnic, and Sex Diversity Trends in Health Professions Programs From Applicants to Graduates
Majerczyk, D., Behnen, E. M., Weldon, D. J., Kanbar, R., Hardy, Y. M., Matsuda, S. K., Hardinger, K. L., & Khalafalla, F. G. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.47817 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Racialized Horizontal Stratification in US Higher Education: Politics, Process, and Consequences
Hamilton, L. T., Dawson, C., Armstrong, E. A., & Waller-Bey, A. (2024) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-083123-035938 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making
Canay, I. A., Mogstad, M., & Mountjoy, J. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27802 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Affirmative action and its race-neutral alternatives
Bleemer, Z. (2023) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2023.104839 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Returns to College(s): Relative Value-Added and Match Effects in Higher EducationPreprint
Mountjoy, J., & Hickman, B. R. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 26 · see citing works
On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision Making
Canay, I. A., Mogstad, M., & Mountjoy, J. (2023) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdad082 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Financial aid uncertainty and low-income students’ higher education preferences
Bernal, G. L., Alvarado, L. K. A., Álvarez-Arango, L. E., & Witte, K. D. (2023) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-023-01094-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Affirmative Action and Precollege Human Capital
Akhtari, M., Bau, N., & Laliberté, J.-W. P. (2023) · American Economic Journal Applied Economics · doi:10.1257/app.20210807 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Qualitative information in undergraduate admissions: A pilot study of letters of recommendation
Rothstein, J. M. (2022) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2022.102285 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Equity Policies in Global Higher Education
Tavares, O., Sá, C., Sin, C., & Amaral, A. M. D. S. E. C. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69691-7 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Students’ heterogeneous preferences and the uneven spatial distribution of colleges
Fu, C., Guo, J., Smith, A. J., & Sorensen, A. (2022) · Journal of Monetary Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.03.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
The Labor Market Effects of Disability Hiring QuotasPreprint
Szerman, C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4267622 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Changes in the College Mobility Pipeline Since 1900
Bleemer, Z., & Quincy, S. (2025) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w33797 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationAccess and Inequality in US Higher Education: Policy Issues
Dill, D. D. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-69691-7_3 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The Returns to College(s): Relative Value-Added and Match Effects in Higher Education
Mountjoy, J., & Hickman, B. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3537773 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Cultural Heterogeneity and the Diverse Success Frames of Second-Generation Mexicans
Diaz, E. B., & Lee, J. (2020) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci9120216 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The climate sciences need representation from the Global South
Virgüez, E., Leon, L., & Freese, L. M. (2024) · One Earth · doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2024.01.016 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Démurger, S., Hanushek, E. A., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Economic Development and Cultural Change · doi:10.1086/727519 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Wu, T. (2023) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-023-29266-2 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Returns to College(s): Relative Value-Added and Match Effects in Higher EducationPreprint
Mountjoy, J., & Hickman, B. R. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3926957 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Keep Me In, Coach: The Short- and Long-Term Effects of Targeted Academic Coaching
Canaan, S., Fischer, S., Mouganie, P., & Schnorr, G. C. (2022) · doi:10.17848/wp22-370 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
The Demise of Affirmative Action in College Admissions
Warikoo, N. K. (2025) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090324-040338 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Kim, S. K. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/13955.001.0001 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Meritocracy and Representation
Sethi, R., & Somanathan, R. (2023) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20221707 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Marginal Returns to Public Universities
Mountjoy, J. (2025) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjaf055 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Does affirmative action address ethnic inequality? A systematic review of the literature
Schotte, S., Gisselquist, R. M., & Leone, T. (2023) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2023/322-2 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Direct and Spillover Effects of Large-Scale Affirmative Action at an Elite Brazilian University
Machado, C., Reyes, G. A. M., & Riehl, E. D. (2023) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/726385 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
de Oliveira, R. C., Santos, A., & Severnini, E. (2023) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2023.102501 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
The Returns to STEM Programs for Less-Prepared Students
Ng, K., & Riehl, E. D. (2024) · American Economic Journal Economic Policy · doi:10.1257/pol.20200694 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Quota versus Quality? Long-Term Gains from an Unusual Gender Quota
Schaede, U., & Mankki, V. (2026) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20230376 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Do Less Informative College Admission Exams Reduce Earnings Inequality? Evidence from Colombia
Riehl, E. D. (2023) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/725167 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Difference-in-Differences with Unequal Baseline Treatment Status
Tazhitdinova, A., & Vázquez-Baré, G. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31063 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Disparities in pre-health advising across California’s public universities
Ríos‐Fetchko, F., Carson, M. S., Tapia, M. M., Fernández, A., & Coffman, J. M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296741 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Eller, C. C. (2023) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/727891 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
What the Students for Fair Admissions Cases Reveal about Racial Preferences
Arcidiacono, P. S., Kinsler, J., & Ransom, T. (2023) · Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics · doi:10.1086/725336 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Wu, T. (2024) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-024-33464-x · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pant, N., & Sharma, A. (2024) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101102 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The long-run impacts of banning affirmative action in US higher education
Antman, F., Duncan, B., & Lovenheim, M. (2024) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grae034 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
The Expansion of Higher Education in Colombia: Bad Students or Bad Programs?
Camacho, A., Messina, J., & Uribe, J. P. (2025) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/lhaf006 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Financial Aid and Upward Mobility: Evidence from Colombia’s Ser Pilo Paga
Vélez, J. L., Rodríguez, C., Sánchez, F., & Álvarez-Arango, L. E. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31737 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
No Revenge for Nerds? Evaluating the Careers of Ivy League Athletes
Amornsiripanitch, N., Gompers, P. A., Hu, G., Levinson, W., & Mukharlyamov, V. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31753 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
How Far Can Inclusion Go? The Long-term Impacts of Preferential College Admissions
Carlana, M., Miglino, E., & Tincani, M. M. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32525 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Switching Schools: Effects of College TransfersPreprint
Miller, L. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4622882 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rubin, E. V., Baker, K. P., Song, Y., & Kellough, J. E. (2024) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/02750740241242057 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Inequality in the Provision of Police Services: Evidence from Residential Burglary Investigations
Goldstein, R. (2022) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/719847 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Varying impacts of letters of recommendation on college admissions
Ben‐Michael, E., Feller, A., & Rothstein, J. M. (2023) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/23-aoas1740 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Excellence for All? University Honors Programs and Human Capital Formation
Pugatch, T., & Thompson, P. N. (2024) · Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis · doi:10.3102/01623737241232971 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Short- and Long-Run Effects of Affirmative Action: Evidence from Imperial ChinaPreprint
Xue, M. M., & Zhang, B. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3997918 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Who Benefits from Remote Schooling? Self-Selection and Match Effects
Bruhn, J., Campos, C., Chyn, E. T., & Tran, A. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31542 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Influence of Affirmative Action Bans on Institutional Retention
Hu, X., Say, K., Barker, J., & Carr, B. (2022) · Journal of College Student Retention Research Theory & Practice · doi:10.1177/15210251221108460 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Better together? Student's benefits of educational market integration
Allende, C., Luksic, J. D., & Nicolás Navarrete, H. (2023) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2023.103233 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2025) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2025.102353 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Han, K. H., & Benton, R. A. (2025) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwaf028 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A STEM Penalty from Affirmative Action Bans?
Mickey-Pabello, D. (2023) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-023-09739-6 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Allu, R., Ganesh, M., Deo, S., & Devalkar, S. K. (2024) · Manufacturing & Service Operations Management · doi:10.1287/msom.2022.0528 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
How Early Morning Classes Change Academic Trajectories: Evidence From a Natural Experiment
Yim, A. (2026) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.70088 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
State Postsecondary Boards as Policy Influencers During the Early Stages of COVID-19
Rall, R. M., Morgan, D. L., Commodore, F., Collier, D., & Fitzpatrick, D. (2023) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/08959048231204338 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Inferring Trade-Offs in University Admissions: Evidence from Cambridge
Bhattacharya, D., & Shvets, J. (2024) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/730544 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Alumni Job Networks at Elite Universities and the Efficacy of Affirmative ActionPreprint
Machado, C., Reyes, G., & Riehl, E. D. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4114556 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bridging the Gap: Mismatch Effects and Catch-Up Dynamics in a Brazilian College Affirmative Action
de Oliveira, R. C., Santos, A., & Severnini, E. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31403 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Sen, S. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4610441 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Athey, S. C., Chetty, R., & Imbens, G. W. (2025) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w33817 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Punongbayan, J. C. B. (2024) · Education Economics · doi:10.1080/09645292.2024.2421165 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Race & Selective School Admissions After SFFA (2023)
Yi, J. E., & Phillips, J. (2025) · Journal of School Choice · doi:10.1080/15582159.2025.2575637 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Mosquera, P. S., Scheffer, M. C., Matijasevich, A., Dias, I. W. H., & Russo, G. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08644-7 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Delayed Bachelor’s Degree Graduates Have Lower Graduate School Enrollment Rates
Bloem, M. D. (2025) · Education Finance and Policy · doi:10.1162/edfp_a_00446 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Racial Diversity and Affirmative Action in American Law Schools
Brooks, R. R. W., Rozema, K., & Sanga, S. (2025) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/734014 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Huchting, K., & McGowan-Robinson, L. (2022) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00131946.2022.2033753 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The impact of affirmative action in India and the United States: A systematic literature review
Schotte, S., Leone, T., & Gisselquist, R. M. (2023) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2023/323-9 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Oliveira, R., Motte, H. Z., & Santos, A. (2023) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2023.102464 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Affirmative action with no major switching: Evidence from a top university in Brazil
de Oliveira, R. C., Santos, A., & Severnini, E. (2022) · Working Paper Series · doi:10.35188/unu-wider/2022/162-4 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Marginal Returns to Public UniversitiesPreprint
Mountjoy, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4775183 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Marginal Returns to Public UniversitiesPreprint
Mountjoy, J. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4787387 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Exclusive quota for economically weaker sections
Pandey, S. K. (2025) · Journal of Policy Modeling · doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2025.09.001 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Keeping it in the family: Student to degree match
Murphy, R., & Silva, P. L. (2026) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2026.102922 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Influence of Mega Universities on college competition and outcomes
Guzman, M., McGuinness, S., & Turner, L. J. (2025) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102688 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Expanding school counseling: The impacts of California funding changes
Sparks, D., & Mulhern, C. (2026) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102754 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Evaluating multiple candidates simultaneously reduces racial disparities in promotion and tenure
Masters-Waage, T. C., Madera, J. M., Edema-Sillo, E., Aubin, A. S., Lindner, P., Gaytan, M., Yu, H. C., & Spitzmueller, C. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-69937-5 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Scholarships and student effort - The transition from Ser Pilo Paga to Excelencia
Penney, J., Moisan, M., Bernal, G. L., & Daniel-Cañizares, J. (2026) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2026.102791 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Using Social Determinants to Diversify the Health Care Workforce: UC Davis Health’s Playbook
Ngo, V., Ton, H., Huling, L., Kochai, K., Dennis, C., & Lubarsky, D. A. (2023) · NEJM Catalyst · doi:10.1056/cat.23.0261 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Affirmative action, college access and major choice: Redistribution with strategic behavior
Melo, A. P. (2025) · Economics of Education Review · doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2025.102622 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Affirmative Action Bans, Individual Bias, and Systematic Inequality
Mickey-Pabello, D., & Guerra, S. (2025) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/23727322251356292 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Documenting Their Decisions: How Undocumented Students Enroll and Persist in College
Gurantz, O., & Obadan, A. (2022) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x221107941 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The nature, detection, and avoidance of harmful discrimination in criminal justice
O’Flaherty, B., Sethi, R., & Williams, M. C. (2023) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22527 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Marginalization Stress: Hate, Violence, and Microaggressions
Vaishnav, S., & Hassouneh, E. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-54626-6_7 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
On the Use of Outcome Tests for Detecting Bias in Decision MakingPreprint
Canay, I. A., Mogstad, M., & Mountjoy, J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4156834 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Keep Me In, Coach: The Short- and Long-Term Effects of Targeted Academic Coaching.Preprint
Canaan, S., Fischer, S., Mouganie, P., & Schnorr, G. C. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4184759 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Difference-in-Differences with Unequal Baseline Treatment StatusPreprint
Tazhitdinova, A., & Vázquez-Baré, G. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4394548 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Affirmative Action at School Entry: School Quality and LearningPreprint
Agarwal, M. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4894456 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The Long-Run Impacts of Banning Affirmative Action in US Higher Education
Antman, F., Duncan, B., & Lovenheim, M. (2024) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w32778 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Sharma, S., & Sengupta, N. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5671642 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Evidence Against the Mismatch Hypothesis in College Admissions a Meta-AnalysisPreprint
Allen, M. R., Nicolini, K. M., & Kim, S.-Y. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4851215 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Schweikart, S. J. (2021) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/amajethics.2021.953
- Authors
- Bleemer, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bleemer, Zachary
- ORCID
- Bleemer, Zachary
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-09-01
- Volume
- 137
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 115-160
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W3135767981
- Semantic Scholar
- 936e1e4588aee40d43dd49d83a6f8370c26fcfe8
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 35.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- National Academy of Education
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- affirmative action, Proposition 209, California public universities, mismatch hypothesis, underrepresented minority students, university admission, educational attainment, STEM degree attainment, wage outcomes, Hispanic students, racial discrimination in higher education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-04.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-04.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review