Cited by 150Higher Education Research StudiesSchool Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Affirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209

Open access
Bleemer, Zachary·2021·The Quarterly Journal of Economics

Abstract

Proposition 209 banned race-based affirmative action at California public universities in 1998. Using a difference-in-differences research design and a newly constructed longitudinal database linking all 1994–2002 University of California applicants to their educational experiences and wages, I show that ending affirmative action caused underrepresented minority (URM) freshman applicants to cascade into lower-quality colleges. The “mismatch hypothesis” implies that this cascade would provide net educational benefits to URM applicants, but their degree attainment declined overall and in STEM fields, especially among less academically qualified applicants. URM applicants’ average wages in their twenties and thirties subsequently declined, driven by declines among Hispanic applicants. These declines are not explained by URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences, which were unchanged after Prop 209. Ending affirmative action also deterred thousands of qualified URM students from applying to any UC campus. Complementary regression discontinuity and institutional value-added analyses suggest that affirmative action’s net educational and wage benefits for URM applicants exceed its net costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

Ending race-based affirmative action at UC after Proposition 209 caused underrepresented minority applicants to cascade into less-selective universities, reducing degree attainment and early-career wages, especially for Hispanic applicants. The results are inconsistent with the Mismatch Hypothesis and suggest affirmative action's net wage benefits for URM applicants exceeded its small costs for on-the-margin white and Asian applicants.

Key findings

  • Prop 209 reduced URM applicants' likelihood of admission to UC's most selective campuses by as much as 50 percentage points relative to academically comparable non-URM applicants; URM enrollment at more-selective UC campuses fell 7.6 percentage points, with at least 1,200 URM UC applicants exiting UC campuses and 800 entering. UC also received about 250 fewer Black and 900 fewer Hispanic applications annually after Prop 209.
  • Bachelor's degree attainment declined by 4.3 percentage points among URM UC applicants in the bottom AI quartile; unconditional STEM degree attainment declined by 1.0 percentage point; graduate degree attainment declined by 1.3 percentage points, with STEM master's/doctoral attainment declining 0.58 percentage points.
  • URM UC applicants' average annual wages declined by 5 percent between ages 24 and 34; each applicant became 1.4 percentage points less likely to earn $100,000 annually in their early 30s. By 2014, Prop 209 had caused at least a 3 percent aggregate decline in high-earning early-career URM Californians, almost wholly driven by Hispanic applicants.
  • Less-selective UC enrollment did not improve URM students' STEM performance or persistence; STEM persistence change had a 95% confidence interval of -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, and STEM course grades were precisely unchanged. A Berkeley regression discontinuity found on-the-margin non-URM students enrolled at similar-quality universities and had similar educational and labor market outcomes.

Methods

  • Difference-in-difference design comparing URM and non-URM California-resident freshman UC applicants before and after Prop 209 (1996-97 vs. 1998-99; robustness using 1994-95), with high school fixed effects and Academic Index covariates. The sample links all 1994-2002 UC applicants to National Student Clearinghouse enrollment/degree records, California Employment Development Department wages, and UC transcript records.
  • Additional analyses include an application-deterrence model using UC-eligible high school graduates by school, ethnicity, and AI bin; a regression discontinuity at UC Berkeley's 1996-97 non-URM admissions threshold; institutional value-added estimates; and STEM course-sequence models across five UC campuses.

Limitations

  • Stated: the reduced-form estimates average over many URM students likely unimpacted by Prop 209, so they likely substantially underestimate effects on students whose enrollment was shifted; they omit impacts on URM Californians dissuaded from UC application; and they omit labor market outcomes for non-Californian and self-employed workers.
  • Stated/evident: value-added statistics likely retain some selection bias and tend to exaggerate differences across institutions; application deterrence could generate sample selection bias, though the paper reports baseline estimates are highly insensitive to detailed controls.
  • Evident: wage records cover only California unemployment-insurance-covered employment; NSC records are incomplete for some institutions and periods; and non-URM applicants are not a true control group because some likely crowded into more-selective universities after Prop 209.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjab027

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

5 of 20 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Interpretationreasoning

    Selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209.

    “Second, that latter return substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants, suggesting that selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 (as in Dale and Krueger (2014)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dale and Krueger (2014) source
  • Interpretationcitation

    The return to more-selective enrollment among URM UC applicants substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants.

    “Second, that latter return substantially exceeds the average observed change in institutional value-added faced by URM UC applicants, suggesting that selective universities' positive treatment effects are considerably above-average for the URM applicants impacted by Prop 209 (as in Dale and Krueger (2014)).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dale and Krueger (2014) source

      The Introduction and Conclusion report that, unlike the generally near-zero selection-adjusted estimates, returns to college selectivity remain positive for Black and Hispanic students in the 1989 cohort. That supports the cited analogy, but the paper does not establish a comparison with institutional value-added for URM UC applicants or estimate effects for applicants affected by Prop 209. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingnone given

    There was a simultaneous sharp rise in URM admits' average test scores.

    “with a simultaneous sharp rise in URM admits' average test scores.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    Before Prop 209, only about three percent of similar-AI non-URM applicants enrolled at the three more-selective UC campuses.

    “while only about three percent of similar-AI non-URM applicants did so.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Enrolling at less-selective UC campuses did not improve URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences.

    “Enrolling at less-selective UC campuses did not improve URM students' performance or persistence in STEM course sequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 53
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The distribution of applicants is smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold, with the McCrary test yielding a p-value of 0.58, and baseline characteristics are also smooth across the threshold.

    “The distribution of applicants is smooth across the threshold, with the McCrary (2008) test yielding a p-value of 0.58 at the threshold.Baseline characteristics are also smooth across the threshold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites McCrary (2008) source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Increased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins.

    “increased university selectivity tends to decrease students' likelihood of earning STEM degrees along different margins”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Arcidiacono, Aucejo, and Hotz, 2016 source

      The Conclusion reports lower science graduation rates for less-prepared students at more selective UC campuses. But it also finds that more selective campuses have an advantage in graduating better-prepared science students, so the claim is too broad when applied to students generally. The supplied passages do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Mountjoy and Hickman, 2020 source
    • cites Bleemer, 2018a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared to academically-comparable white applicants, Asian applicants enrolled at similar universities and had indistinguishable long-run labor market outcomes after Prop 209.

    “Compared to academicallycomparable white applicants, Asian applicants enrolled at similar universities and had indistinguishable long-run labor market outcomes after Prop 209, suggesting proportional effects of affirmative action for both groups.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most UC campuses continued providing large admissions advantages to URM applicants in 1996 and 1997, but those advantages shrank considerably in 1998.

    “Figure 1 shows that most campuses continued providing large admissions advantages to URM applicants in 1996 and 1997 (though UCLA, Irvine, and Santa Cruz curtailed their programs), but those advantages shrank considerably in 1998.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    After Prop 209, high-AI URM applicants tended to flow from UC's more-selective campuses to less-selective campuses and elite private universities, while lower-AI URM applicants mostly flowed to less-selective California colleges and universities.

    “After Prop 209, high-AI URM applicants tended to flow from UC's more-selective campuses to less-selective campuses and -especially among Black applicants -elite private universities, while lower-AI URM applicants mostly flowed to less-selective California colleges and universities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Figure 4 shows six-year BA attainment among bottom-AI-quartile applicants, unconditional STEM degree attainment, and graduate degree attainment all abruptly and persistently decline in 1998 following Prop 209.

    “Figure 4 presents estimates from Equation 1 for six-year BA attainment among bottom-AI-quartile applicants, unconditional STEM degree attainment, and graduate degree attainment, showing that all three abruptly and persistently decline in 1998 following Prop 209.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The institutions where URM UC applicants enrolled remained relatively steady in CFSTY early-30s annual wage value-added between 1995 and 1997, but sharply and persistently declined by about $1,000 after 1998.

    “Figure 4 shows that the institutions where URM UC applicants enrolled remained relatively steady in terms of their”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Average SAT scores of students admitted to each UC campus steadily rose during the period.

    “as were the average scores of students admitted to each campus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Much of the graduate degree decline was in STEM fields.

    “Prop 209 also caused a 1.3 percentage point decline in each URM applicant's likelihood of earning a graduate degree, with much of that decline in STEM fields.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prop 209 curbed the large admissions advantages provided to all URM UC applicants by affirmative action, with many URM applicants becoming 50 percentage points less likely to earn admission to UC's most selective campuses relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.

    “Prop 209 curbed the large admissions advantages provided to all underrepresented minority (URM) UC applicants by affirmative action, with many URM applicants becoming 50 percentage points less likely to earn admission to UC's most selective campuses relative to academically-comparable non-URM applicants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Students just below Berkeley's admissions threshold nevertheless enrolled at similar-quality universities and ended up with similar educational and labor market outcomes.

    “Employing a regression discontinuity design, I find that students just below Berkeley's admissions threshold nevertheless enrolled at similar-quality universities and ended up with similar educational and labor market outcomes, though the confidence intervals cannot rule out positive treatment effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Almost 20 percent of UC applicants were URM in 1997.

    “Almost 20 percent of UC applicants were URM in 1997”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before Prop 209, URM UC students earned lower grades and were less likely to persist along introductory STEM course sequences than their non-URM peers.

    “While I find that before Prop 209 URM UC students earned lower grades and were less likely to persist along introductory STEM course sequences than their non-URM peers, these gaps are largely explained by students' prior academic opportunities and preparedness, not their enrollment institution.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    URM applicants' wages sharply decline between 1997 and 1998, reflecting the impact of Prop 209, but there is also evidence of a decline after 1996 and continued declines between 1998 and 2000.

    “URM applicants' wages sharply decline between 1997 and 1998, reflecting the impact of Prop 209, but there is also evidence of a decline after 1996 and continued declines between 1998 and 2000.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No further combination of detailed control functions and covariates meaningfully changes any of the beta 98-99 estimates, except the six-year degree attainment measure grows slightly more negative.

    “there is no further combination of these highly-detailed control functions and covariates that meaningfully changes any of the 𝛽𝛽 98-99 estimates, with the exception of the six-year degree attainment measure growing slightly more negative.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    URM enrollees' STEM performance and persistence were unchanged when their class rank improved; the 95 percent confidence interval around the estimated change in STEM persistence narrowly bounds 0, from -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, small relative to the raw STEM persistence ethnicity gap of 11.2 percentage points before Prop 209.

    “URM enrollees STEM performance and persistence were unchanged when their class rank improved; the 95 percent confidence interval around the estimated change in STEM persistence narrowly bounds 0, from -2.3 to 3.5 percentage points, small effects relative to the raw STEM persistence ethnicity gap of 11.2 percentage points before Prop 209.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Before Prop 209, Berkeley's URM students earned lower average grades by 0.77 grade points and were 19 percentage points less likely to persist along STEM course sequences.

    “The last column of Table A-18 shows that before Prop 209, Berkeley's URM students earned lower average grades by 0.77 grade points and were 19 percentage points less likely to persist along STEM course sequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prop 209 led URM students to enroll at universities with lower early-30s wage value-added by as much as $1,000, while those students' actual early-30s annual wages fell by more than $2,000.

    “While Prop 209 led URM students to enroll at universities with lower early-30s wage value-added by as much as $1,000, those students' actual early-30s annual wages fell by more than $2,000 (see Tables 2 and 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prop 209 led Berkeley's (higher-testing) URM students to earn slightly higher STEM grades (by 0.14 grade points), but if anything their STEM persistence slightly declined.

    “In fact, Prop 209 does lead Berkeley's (higher-testing) URM students to earn slightly higher STEM grades (by 0.14 grade points), but if anything their STEM persistence slightly declined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    URM UC applicants' university enrollment sharply shifted away from UC's more-selective Berkeley and UCLA campuses, causing a cascade of students to enroll at lower-quality public institutions and some private universities.

    “URM UC applicants' university enrollment sharply shifted away from UC's more-selective Berkeley and UCLA campuses, causing a cascade of students to enroll at lower-quality public institutions and some private universities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most of the on-the-margin non-URM students would likely have otherwise enrolled at UCLA or UCSD (6.1 percentage points, s.e. 3.5) or out-of-state universities (8.0 percentage points, s.e. 3.4).

    “Most of the students would likely have otherwise enrolled at UCLA or UCSD (6.1 percentage points, s.e.3.5) or out-of-state universities (8.0 percentage points, s.e.3.4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prop 209 failed to increase URM UC applicants' likelihood of earning a STEM degree and led to the opposite effect.

    “Complementing the previous section's finding that Prop 209 failed to increase URM UC applicants' likelihood of earning a STEM degree -indeed, it led to the opposite effect”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Graduate school enrollment, early-30s wages, and the number of years spent earning over $150,000 per year are smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold.

    “Panels (d) to ( f) of Figure 10 show that graduate school enrollment, early-30s wages, and the number of years spent by each applicant in their early 30s earning over $150,000 per year are smooth across the Berkeley admissions threshold.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    UC had 56,300 URM applicants between 1998 and 2002.

    “UC had 56,300 URM applicants between 1998 and 2002.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    About 80 percent of URM UC applicants were Hispanic, and those applicants received the full observed wage benefits of UC affirmative action policies.

    “About 80 percent of URM UC applicants were Hispanic, and those applicants received the full observed wage benefits of UC affirmative action policies,”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Poorer educational outcomes contributed to a five percent average annual decline in applicants' wages throughout their 20s and early 30s, which resulted in a decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.

    “These poorer educational outcomes in turn contributed to a five percent average annual decline in applicants' wages throughout their 20s and early 30s, which resulted in a decline in the number of early-career URM Californians earning over $100,000 by at least three percent.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    While Black and Hispanic UC applicants faced similar declines in university quality and educational outcomes after Prop 209, and Hispanic UC applicants' wages and wage percentile sharply declined after 1998, there was no observable parallel decline among Black UC applicants.

    “While Black and Hispanic UC applicants faced similar declines in university quality and educational outcomes after Prop 209, and Hispanic UC applicants' wages and wage percentile sharply declined after 1998, there was no observable parallel decline among Black UC applicants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Single-difference estimates show that non-URM wage outcomes are notably smooth in the years before and after Prop 209, while URM wage outcomes sharply and persistently decline in 1998.

    “First, single-difference estimates of the baseline outcomes show that non-URM wage outcomes are notably smooth in the years before and after Prop 209, while URM wage outcomes sharply and persistently decline in 1998 (see Figure A-13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The number of Black and Hispanic UC applicants declined by 12-13 percent (about 1,200 per year) after Prop 209, most of whom would have likely been admitted to some UC campus.

    “The sum across the scaled statistics suggests that the number of Black and Hispanic UC applicants declined by 12-13 percent (about 1,200 per year), most of whom would have likely been admitted to some UC campus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Including either p statistic as a covariate in Equation 1 yields statistically-significant negative coefficients, implying negative selection out of UC application, while their inverse mills ratios yield significant positive coefficients.

    “As expected, including either of these p statistics as covariates in Equation 1 yields statistically-significant negative coefficients (implying negative selection out of UC application), while their inverse mills ratios yield significant positive coefficients.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The relative decline in URM performance is driven by URM students in the bottom two terciles of SAT scores, with no observed declines among high-or low-GPA high-SAT students.

    “This hypothesis is supported by the finding that the relative decline in URM performance is driven by URM students in the bottom two terciles of SAT scores, with no observed declines among high-or low-GPA high-SAT students (see Table A -19).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Prop 209 caused URM students to enroll in STEM courses in which their average SAT percentile was about four percentage points higher, closing that gap by more than half.

    “The first panel of Figure 9 shows that Prop 209 caused URM students to enroll in STEM courses in which their average SAT percentile was about four percentage points higher, closing that gap by more than half.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pre-Prop 209 gaps in URM STEM grades and persistence are fully explained by URM enrollees' poorer prior academic opportunity and preparedness; their performance and persistence was indistinguishable from academically-comparable non-URM students across the five UC campuses.

    “These gaps are fully explained by URM enrollees' poorer prior academic opportunity and preparedness; their performance and persistence was indistinguishable from those of academically-comparable non-URM students across the five UC campuses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Though Black UC applicants faced a decline in degree attainment after Prop 209, their early-career wages were not observably impacted.

    “Though Black UC applicants faced a decline in degree attainment after Prop 209, their early-career wages were not observably impacted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Not every UC-eligible applicant was admitted to a UC campus; many were rejected from each campus to which they applied.

    “Not every UC-eligible applicant was admitted to a UC campus; many were rejected from each campus to which they applied”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    White and Asian students were proportionally impacted by Prop 209, with no evidence of disparate impacts for one or the other.

    “White and Asian students were proportionally impacted by Prop 209, with no evidence of disparate impacts for one or the other.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    URM applicants faced similar-magnitude declines in admissions likelihood at San Diego and Davis, and their admissions advantage fell at every UC campus.

    “URM applicants faced similar-magnitude declines in their admissions likelihood at San Diego and Davis, and their admissions advantage fell at every campus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Conditioning on the set of UC campuses to which applicants were admitted flips the sign of the UC-wide coefficient to 2.8 percentage points; compared to academically-similar students admitted to the same UC campuses, post-1998 URM students are more likely to enroll at some UC campus.

    “conditioning on the set of UC campuses to which applicants were admitted flips the sign of the UC-wide coefficient (to 2.8 percentage points); compared to academically-similar students admitted to the same UC campuses, post-1998 URM students are more likely to enroll at some UC campus.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Admissions and enrollment statistics are slightly larger when estimated relative to the 1994-95 baseline.

    “Admissions and enrollment statistics are slightly larger when estimated relative to the 1994-95 baseline”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Under AA, URM applicants were 37 percentage points more likely than comparable non-URM applicants to be admitted to Berkeley and 27 percentage points more likely at UCLA.

    “While URM applicants were 37 and 27 percentage points more likely than comparable non-URM applicants to be admitted to Berkeley and UCLA under AA”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The difference in R2 between admission regressions with and without ethnicity was about 0.25 at UCLA in 1994-95, 0.15 in 1996-97, and less than 0.05 after 1998.

    “Figure A-4 shows, for example, that the difference was about 0.25 at UCLA in 1994-95, 0.15 in 1996-97, and less than 0.05 after 1998.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each model includes components used to construct UC's Academic Index, which absorb variation in applicants' observed academic preparedness.

    “and the components used to construct UC's Academic Index (𝑋𝑋 𝑖𝑖𝑖𝑖 ), which absorb variation in applicants' observed academic preparedness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    UC's primary policy response to the end of affirmative action was its Eligibility in the Local Context top percent policy, which did not begin until 2001.

    “Instead, UC's primary policy response to the end of affirmative action was its Eligibility in the Local Context top percent policy, which did not begin until 2001 (Bleemer, 2019a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bleemer, 2019a

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    URM students from more-selective schools took the less-selective university seats previously held by lower-AI URM students rejected in the absence of affirmative action, who themselves took the seats of other URM students who formerly enrolled at even less-selective universities.

    “with URM students from more-selective schools taking the less-selective university seats previously held by lower-AI URM students rejected in the absence of affirmative action, who themselves take the seats of other URM students who formerly enrolled at even less-selective universities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Each model includes high school fixed effects, which absorb spurious cross-school application and outcome variation.

    “Each model includes high school fixed effects 𝛼𝛼 ℎ 𝑖𝑖 , which absorb spurious cross-school application and outcome variation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209, every one percentage point average decrease in URM applicants' enrollment likelihood corresponds to almost a 0.25 percentage point average increase in non-URM applicants' enrollment likelihood.

    “if UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209, every one percentage point average decrease in URM applicants' enrollment likelihood corresponds to almost a 0.25 percentage point average increase in non-URM applicants' enrollment likelihood.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • The authors state this as an assumption: UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    It remains possible that the beta estimates reflect sample selection bias resulting from the impact of Prop 209 on the composition of UC applicants.

    “It remains possible that the 𝛽𝛽 𝑖𝑖 estimates reflect sample selection bias resulting from the impact of Prop 209 on the composition of UC applicants”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    No UC campus implemented any substantial unrelated changes in their admissions processes in this period.

    “No UC campus implemented any substantial unrelated changes in their admissions processes in this period.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pareto efficiency is very unlikely in this context, because even a single non-URM student benefiting from more-selective enrollment as a result of Prop 209 would prove the policy's inefficiency.

    “While Pareto efficiency is very unlikely in this context -even a single non-URM student benefiting from more-selective enrollment as a result of Prop 209 would prove the policy's inefficiency”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In 1996 and 1997 Berkeley guaranteed admission to applicants above an annually-determined AI threshold, and admissions officers admitted some lower-AI applicants based on other application characteristics.

    “In 1996 and 1997 Berkeley guaranteed admission to applicants above an annually-determined AI threshold.77 Admissions officers then admitted some lower-AI applicants based on other application characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Applicants near Berkeley's admissions threshold are quasi-randomly located on one or the other side of the threshold, differentiated by small test score or grade differences, so outcome differences on either side are interpreted as resulting from above-threshold applicants' greater access to UC Berkeley.

    “Because applicants near Berkeley's admissions threshold are quasi-randomly located on one or the other side of the threshold, differentiated by small test score or grade differences, I interpret outcome differences on either side of the threshold as resulting from the above-threshold applicants' greater access to UC Berkeley.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The gap in wage outcomes may be partially explained by positively-selected Black students' greater likelihood of exiting California to enroll at Ivy+ and other highly-selective private universities.

    “While gap may be partially explained by positively-selected Black students' greater likelihood of exiting California to enroll at Ivy+ and other highly-selective private universities”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationown data

    SAT scores are relatively negatively-biased measures of low-testing URM students' academic preparedness, such that Berkeley's selection away from those students causes a decline in URM enrollees' relative overperformance.

    “An alternative hypothesis is that SAT scores are relatively negatively-biased measures of low-testing URM students' academic preparedness, such that Berkeley's selection away from those students causes a decline in URM enrollees' relative overperformance (Vars and Bowen, 1998; Niu and Tienda, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Vars and Bowen, 1998

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Niu and Tienda, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Impacted non-URM students already had access to similar-quality universities even without broader UC admissions, and their more-selective enrollment following Prop 209 had relatively small long-run effects on their economic outcomes.

    “diverse evidence suggest that those impacted non-URM students -whose more-selective university enrollment increased following Prop 209 -already had access to similar-quality universities even without broader UC admissions, and that their more-selective enrollment following Prop 209 had relatively small long-run effects on their economic outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Few remaining unobservables could contribute to selection bias, and the magnitude of remaining bias is very likely small.

    “There are few remaining unobservables that could contribute to selection bias in this case -while applicants' academic, demographic, and socioeconomic status and cross-school application behavior are observed in detail, orthogonal dimensions of their high school leadership activities remain unobserved -and it appears very likely that the magnitude of remaining bias is small.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This study documents the meaningful potential of affirmative action policies to promote economic mobility in the US, though perhaps not to close white-black mobility gaps, and the consequences of the policies' prohibition.

    “Nevertheless, this study documents the meaningful potential of affirmative action policies to promote economic mobility in the US -though perhaps not to close white-black mobility gaps -and the consequences of the policies' prohibition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Berkeley chose its annual threshold so that 50 percent of its admitted applicants had AI above the threshold, and the threshold could not be chosen until after Berkeley observed all applicants' AIs, prohibiting applicants from manipulating their AI to exceed the threshold.

    “Berkeley chose its annual threshold so that 50 percent of its admitted applicants had AI above the threshold.As a result, the threshold could not be chosen until after Berkeley observed all applicants' AIs, prohibiting applicants from manipulating their AI to exceed the threshold (as occurred at UC Davis, another institution with a contemporaneous admissions threshold).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Targeted URM students received substantially above-average wage returns to more-selective university enrollment under affirmative action, and thus faced disproportionate declines after Prop 209.

    “The targeted URM students, on the other hand, received substantially above-average wage returns to more-selective university enrollment under affirmative action, and thus faced disproportionate declines after Prop 209.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    On-the-margin non-URM students have access to alternative similar-value universities, and switching enrollment to UC Berkeley provides little measurable long-run economic return.

    “the observed effects suggest that on-themargin non-URM students have access to alternative similar-value universities, and switching enrollment to UC Berkeley provides little measurable long-run economic return.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These results strikingly differ from several existing estimates of the impact of affirmative action, even those focusing on Prop 209's effect at the University of California, and highlight the importance of high-quality and detailed administrative data and a transparent research design to account for sample selection and omitted variable bias.

    “These results strikingly differ from several existing estimates of the impact of affirmative action, even those focusing on Prop 209's effect at the University of California, and highlight the importance of high-quality and detailed administrative data and a transparent research design to account for sample selection and omitted variable bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The concern about NSC non-reporting does not extend to the graduate degree estimates; most such degrees are not earned at the same institutions where applicants earned their undergraduate degrees, and NSC coverage was very wide by the time applicants in the sample were earning graduate degrees.

    “Moreover, this concern does not extend to the graduate degree estimates; most such degrees are not earned at the same institutions where applicants earned their undergraduate degrees, and NSC coverage was very wide by the time applicants in the sample were earning graduate degrees.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The two lines in Figure A-14 poorly mirror each other, suggesting VA poorly explains and substantially underestimates the observed labor market effects of Prop 209.

    “The two lines poorly mirror each other, suggesting both that VA poorly-explains and substantially underestimates the observed labor market effects of Prop 209.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Among UC enrollees, the verified social security number differs from that reported on their application in fewer than 0.25 percent of cases.

    “Among enrollees, the verified social security number differs from that reported on their application in fewer than 0.25 percent of cases.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Grades may differ across classes as a result of grade inflation, but the analysis cannot separately identify inflation from actual differences in mean cross-class performance differences.

    “Grades may differ across classes as a result of grade inflation, but I cannot separately identify inflation from actual differences in mean crossclass performance differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    All employment results are replicated from institutional research conducted at the UC Office of the President.

    “All employment results are replicated from institutional research conducted at the UC Office of the President”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bleemer (2019b)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Social security numbers on UC applications are not verified unless the student enrolls at a UC campus.

    “Social security numbers on UC applications are not verified unless the student enrolls at a UC campus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    National NSC enrollment coverage at four-year institutions was below 50 percent in 1996, rising to over 80 percent by 2000.

    “Dynarski, Hemelt, and Hyman (2015) show that national NSC enrollment coverage at four-year institutions was below 50 percent in 1996, rising to over 80 percent by 2000.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dynarski, Hemelt, and Hyman (2015)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    About nine percent of near-threshold students have no observed four-year enrollment, with only one percent enrolling at a community college but no four-year institution within six years.

    “About nine percent of near-threshold students have no observed four-year enrollment, with only one percent enrolling at a community college but no four-year institution within six years.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Family income is not reported by about 15 percent of UC applicants.

    “Family income is not reported by about 15 percent of applicants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    $150,000 is a better indicator of unusually high earnings, achieved in an average 0.60 out of 5 years for in-sample applicants.

    “$150,000 is a better indicator of unusually high earnings, achieved in an average 0.60 out of 5 years for in-sample applicants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
70 of 70
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Non-URM applicants can serve as a valid control group for URM applicants after Prop 209, despite potential crowd-in effects.

    “Non-URM applicants may not represent a traditional”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many URM UC applicants would have enrolled at the same institution whether or not affirmative action was operative.

    “These estimated effects are averaged across every URM UC applicant, many of whom likely would have enrolled at the same institution whether or not affirmative action was operative.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The true distribution of AI across school-year-ethnicity cohorts remains unchanged over time.

    “implicitly assuming that the true distribution of AI across school-year-ethnicity cohorts remains unchanged over time.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The difference-in-difference coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes.

    “Assuming that these coefficients reflect a decline in URM labor market outcomes”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.

    “Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal.

    “If universities' treatment effects for on-the-margin URM and non-URM students are equal”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Prop 209's monotonicity holds.

    “assuming Prop 209's monotonicity”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209.

    “if UC campuses' enrollment did not respond to Prop 209”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.

    “Admit estimates implicitly assume that each UC applicant's admission is small relative to the size and composition of the applicant pool.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities.

    “Assuming that the presented value-added statistics either approximate or relatively overestimate the average difference in treatment effects of enrolling at those universities”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    About one-third of UC students transfer from community colleges rather than applying as freshmen.

    “About one-third of UC students transfer from community colleges rather than applying as freshmen.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Missing-ethnicity applicants are non-URM.

    “These results justify the assumption in the baseline analysis that missing-ethnicity applicants are non-URM.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    UC enrollment declined after Prop 209.

    “Since UC enrollment declined after Prop 209”
13 of 13

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Johnson, 2019, Children of the Dream: Why School Integration Works
  2. Juhn, 1991), Accounting for the Slowdown in Black-White Wage Convergence, 107

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bleemer, Z.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Bleemer, Zachary
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2021-09-01
Volume
137
Issue
1
Pages
115-160
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
OpenAlex
W3135767981
Cited by
149
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
35.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Academy of Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
affirmative action, Proposition 209, California public universities, mismatch hypothesis, underrepresented minority students, university admission, educational attainment, STEM degree attainment, wage outcomes, Hispanic students, racial discrimination in higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-11-04.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-11-04.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review