Cited by 182Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsAmerican Political and Social Dynamics

How Trump Lost and Won

Sides, John, Tesler, Michael, Vavreck, Lynn·2017·Journal of Democracy

Abstract

The 2016 campaign ended with a surprising and inconclusive outcome: Hillary Clinton won the popular vote comfortably but lost the Electoral College to Donald Trump. We identify three factors that help explain this outcome. First, fundamental economic and political trends favored a Democratic popular vote win. Second, the party coalitions had become more polarized by race and education during Obama’s presidency. Third, Trump’s focus on issues connected to ethnic and social identities made attitudes toward immigration and African-Americans more important in voters’ choices in 2016 than they had been in 2012.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jod.2017.0022

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is growing evidence that racial prejudice and resentment is one of the critical determinants of the appeal of Donald Trump to a substantial proportion of American adults.

    “There is growing evidence that racial prejudice and resentment is one of the critical determinants of the appeal of Donald Trump to a substantial proportion of American adults [128,129,130].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sides, J., Tesler, M., & Vavreck, L.
Venue
Journal of Democracy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2017
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
34-44
ISSN
  • 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3214
OpenAlex
W2606939956
Cited by
182
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3
FWCI
130.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › American Political and Social Dynamics
Keywords
2016 US presidential election, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, Electoral College, popular vote, partisan polarization, racial polarization, education and voting, immigration attitudes, African American voters, ethnic identity, social identity, Obama administration, vote choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review