Cited by 9Indigenous Knowledge Systems and AgricultureAmazonian Archaeology and EthnohistoryAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Cultivated food plants: culture and gendered spaces of colonists and the chachi in Ecuador

Fadiman, Maria G·2005·Journal of Latin American Geography

Abstract

Colonists and indigenous groups living in and around Ecuador's Mache-Chindul Reserve cultivate various subsistence food plants. The data reveal various differences between the two groups in regards to gendered agricultural spaces. Colonists maintain distinct planting areas, while the Chachi do so less. While each group plants some of the same crops, their basic staples differ: rice for the colonists and plantains for the Chachi. The gendered spaces are also distinct. In colonist households, women take primary care of plants closest to the home, while men's domain is furthest from the home. Among the Chachi, the reverse pattern is the norm. This spatial organization is looked at in the context of previous theories regarding gender and agricultural. These distinctions are important to be considered in the context of better understanding gendered space among rural groups, and also for developing and implementing effective land use programs in and around protected areas. Los colonos y grupos ind�genas que viven dentro y alrededor de la reserva ecuatoriana Mache-Chindul cultivan varias plantas de subsistencia. Mis investigaciones muestran importantes diferencias entre los dos grupos relativas a los espacios agr�colas y las relaciones de g�nero a su interior. Los colonos mantienen zonas plantadas separadas y claramente diferenciadas, los Chachi en menor medida. Aunque cada grupo siembra algunos de los mismos cultivos, sus productos b�sicos son diferentes: arroz para los colonos y pl�tanos para los Chachi. Las relaciones de g�nero dentro de los espacios agr�colas tambi�n son distintos. En los hogares de los colonos, las mujeres cuidan las plantas m�s cerca de la casa, mientras los hombres tienen sus dominios m�s lejos. Entre los Chachi el patr�n es el contrario. Se examina esta organizaci�n espacial desde perspectivas te�ricas sobre g�nero y la agricultura. Tales diferenciaciones son importantes para un mejor entendimiento del espacio afectado por el g�nero dentro grupos rurales, y tambi�n para el desarrollo e implementaci�n de programas de uso del suelo efectivos dentro y alrededor de �reas protegidas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/lag.2005.0024

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Fadiman, M. G.
Corresponding author
Fadiman, Maria G
Venue
Journal of Latin American Geography
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2005
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
43-57
ISSN
  • 1545-2476 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5811
OpenAlex
W2038374599
Cited by
9
References
49
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Latin American geography (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Amazonian Archaeology and Ethnohistory
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
colonists, rice cultivation, plantain cultivation, gender division of labor, spatial organization of agriculture, protected areas, indigenous peoples, Ecuador

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review