The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Islands of Reliability for Regular Morphology: Evidence from Italian
Abstract
The representation of regular morphological processes has been the subject of much controversy, particularly in the debate between single and dual route models of morphology. I present a model of morphological learning that posits rules and seeks to infer their productivity by comparing their reliability in different phonological environments. The result of this procedure is a grammar in which general rules exist alongside more specific, but more reliable, generalizations describing subregularities for the same process. I present results from a nonce-probe (wug) experiment in Italian, in which speakers rated the acceptability of novel infinitives in various conjugation classes. These results indicate that such subregularities are in fact internalized by speakers, even for a regular morphological process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regular morphology and the lexicon
Bybee, J. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 · Cited by 1,541
The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar
Ullman, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1005204207369 · Cited by 508
Cited by
Rules vs. analogy in English past tenses: a computational/experimental study
Albright, A., & Hayes, B. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00146-x · Cited by 769
Self-citationThe Acquisition of Morphophonology
MacWhinney, B. (1978) · Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development · doi:10.2307/1166047 · Cited by 502
The architecture of grammar and the division of labor in exponence
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012) · The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199573721.003.0002 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Albright, A.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 684-709
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-0665
- OpenAlex
- W1992844041
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 55.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
