Cited by 29Social Media and PoliticsWeb and Library ServicesLibrary Science and Administration

#NoDAPL: Social media, empowerment, and civic participation at standing rock

Open access
Johnson, Hayley·2017·Library Trends

Abstract

The struggle for environmental and social justice within American Indian communities is one that has been ongoing since the beginning of United States history, but the main catalyst to effect change and to promote and disperse the American Indian narrative has emerged through the power of social media in today's hyperconnected society.This article examines the power of social media to effect change, as well as a hyperconnected society's ability to empower historically disadvantaged groups that have often been misrepresented within traditional media outlets.The historic movement occurring at Standing Rock, North Dakota, and the #NoDAPL protests illustrates the capacity of social media to galvanize individuals to become changemakers as well as create a vast support network within a population that might otherwise remain uninformed or unaware of media misrepresentations.The role of libraries as support systems within communities and the responsibility of libraries to provide unbiased and freely available information within a hyperconnected society are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/lib.2017.0033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Baylor, T. 1996. "Media Framing of Movement Protest: The Case of American Indian Protest." Social Science Journal 33: 3.
  2. Dolata, U., and J. F. Schrape. 2016. "Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements: Collective Action in the Internet Age." Social Movement Studies 15 (1): 1-18.
  3. Guerrero, M. 1992. "American Indian Water Rights: The Blood of Life in Native North Amer- ica." In The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance, edited by M. A. Jaimes, 189-216. Boston: South End Press.
  4. Hooks, G., and C. L. Smith. 2004. "The Treadmill of Destruction: National Sacrifice Areas and Native Americans." American Sociological Review 69 (4): 558-75.
  5. Postmes, T., and S. Brunsting. 2002. "Collective Action in the Age of the Internet: Mass Com- munication and Online Mobilization." Social Science Computer Review 20 (3): 290-301.
  6. Rodriguez, S. 2013. "Making Sense of Social Change: Observing Collective Action in Net- worked Cultures." Sociology Compass 7 (12): 1053-64.
  7. Schlosberg, D, and D. Carruthers. 2010. "Indigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities." Global Environmental Politics 10 (4): 12-35.
  8. Springer, P. 2016. "ND Governor Says Pipeline Company 'Abdicated' Role in Defending Proj- ect." Inforum, December 8, 2016. http://www.inforum.com/news/4176139-nd-governor -says-pipeline-company-abdicated-role-defending-project.

Authors
Johnson, H.
Corresponding author
Johnson, Hayley
Venue
Library Trends
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2017
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
155-175
ISSN
  • 0024-2594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-0682
OpenAlex
W2788767191
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Library trends (publishedVersion)
  • Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) (submittedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web and Library Services
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Administration
Keywords
#NoDAPL, Standing Rock protests, social media, citizen participation, empowerment, American Indian communities, environmental justice, social justice, media representation, libraries, access to information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review