Cited by 152Online Learning and AnalyticsHigher Education Research StudiesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Investigating student motivation in the context of a learning analytics intervention during a summer bridge program

Lonn, Steven, Aguilar, Stephen J., Teasley, Stephanie D.·2015·Computers in Human Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.013

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lonn, S., Aguilar, S. J., & Teasley, S. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Lonn, Steven
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
47
Pages
90-97
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981210033
Cited by
152
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
FWCI
9.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
student motivation, summer bridge programs, mastery orientation, academic advising, student retention, at-risk students, high-impact practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review