The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
"Out of the Parlors and into the Streets": The Changing Tactical Repertoire of the U.S. Women' Suffrage Movements
Abstract
Little empirical research exists on major changes in the strategies and tactics of social movements, but some researchers argue that organizational readiness and political opportunities produce such changes. This article examines the circumstances that led some state woman suffrage movements to use a bold new tactic, the suffrage parade, beginning in the early twentieth century. An event-history analysis reveals that organizational readiness and political opportunities had little to do with change in the suffragists' strategic approach. Rather, the change occurred when movements consisted of a diverse assortment of organizations, when movement organizations were less centrally structured, when conflict existed among movement members, when movements engaged in fundraising, and when the suffragists had recently experienced significant political defeat. The model of tactical change presented here better explains the impetuses for such a shift than do earlier explanations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,333
From Mobilization to Revolution
Tilly, C. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315205021-5 · Cited by 4,005
Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970
McAdam, D. (1999) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226555553.001.0001 · Cited by 3,183
Political opportunity structures and political protest: anti-nuclear movements in four democracies
Kitschelt, H. P. (1986) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712340000380x · Cited by 2,563
The Strategy of Social Protest.
Lewis, J. M., & Gamson, W. A. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2063633 · Cited by 2,120
Power in movement: social movements, collective action and politics
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4208 · Cited by 1,850
Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency
McAdam, D. (1983) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095322 · Cited by 1,016 · cited 9×
“In one of the few investigations of the forces that shape strategy choices, McAdam (1983) finds that tactical innovations in the civil * I am grateful to Karen Campbell, Ellen Granberg, and Chris Mowery for help with data collection and to David Meyer, Leila Rupp, Wayne Santoro, and Verta Taylor…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialProtest as a Political Resource
Lipsky, M. (1968) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1953909 · Cited by 870
Ganz, M. (2000) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210398 · Cited by 799
Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement
Benford, R. D. (1993) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/71.3.677 · Cited by 755
Cited by
Women's Suffrage, Political Responsiveness, and Child Survival in American History *
Miller, G. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2008.123.3.1287 · Cited by 421
Resisting Dictatorship: Repression and Protest in Southeast Asia
Boudreau, V. G. (2004) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511550867 · Cited by 273
Competition and Resource Partitioning in Three Social Movement Industries
Soule, S. A., & King, B. G. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/587152 · Cited by 192
The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies
Weber, K., & King, B. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199671083.001.0001 · Cited by 157
How Participatory Democracy Became White: Culture and Organizational Choice
Polletta, F. (2005) · Mobilization An International Quarterly · doi:10.17813/maiq.10.2.96746725j1312512 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- McCammon, H. J.
- Affiliations
- Vanderbilt University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCammon, H. J.
- ORCID
- McCammon, H. J.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 787-818
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2006631459
- Semantic Scholar
- 4895a619717edfa070b2c2d2c2ed891c6b3280ba
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 18.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Forces (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical Gender and Feminism Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
- Keywords
- women's suffrage movement, social movement strategy, organizational readiness, political opportunity structure, movement diversity, internal conflict, fundraising, political defeat, event history analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.