The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Women's Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology
Abstract
Women's low rate of participation at the highest levels of politics is an enduring problem in gender stratification. Previous cross-national research on women in national legislatures has stressed three explanations for differences in women's political representation: social structure, politics, and ideology. Despite strong theory suggesting the importance of ideology, it has not found support in previous cross-national statistical studies. But ideology has not been as well measured as structural and political factors. In this article, we demonstrate that gender ideology strongly affects the number of women in national legislatures. We do so by introducing a newly available measure of national gender ideology into a cross-national model of women in legislatures. We demonstrate that ideology, when measured more precisely, strongly predicts differences in women's political representation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Cited by
The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics
TEELE, D. L., KALLA, J., & ROSENBLUTH, F. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000217 · Cited by 382
Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100306 · Cited by 358
Women’s Political Empowerment: A New Global Index, 1900–2012
Sundström, A., Paxton, P., Wang, Y.-T., & Lindberg, S. I. (2017) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.016 · Cited by 292
Self-citationIntersectionality, Quotas, and Minority Women's Political Representation Worldwide
HUGHES, M. M. (2011) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055411000293 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Paxton, P., & Kunovich, S.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 87-113
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W1964016752
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
