Cited by 397Indigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsMemory, Trauma, and Testimony

Felt Theory: An Indigenous Feminist Approach to Affect and History

Dian Million·2009·Wicazo Sa Review

Abstract

Felt TheoryAn Indigenous Feminist Approach to Affect and History Dian Million (bio) An ideology is made of what it does not mention; it exists because there are things which must not be spoken of —Pierre Machery1 We were not normal children at these schools, we were more like robots, always taking orders, never involved in decision-making of any kind. We were never asked what we thought or even encouraged to think for ourselves. We learned soon after arriving at the schools not to express ourselves. We got into trouble when we spoke our minds, expressed feelings, or dared to question anything. —Bev Sellars2 [End Page 53] In this essay I make the case for remembering and understanding the impact of Canadian First Nation women’s first-person and experiential narrative on white, mostly male mainstream scholarship. I argue that these narratives were political acts in themselves that in their time exploded the measured “objective” accounts of Canadian (and U.S.) colonial histories. First Nations women in Canada changed the actual conditions for what could be said about the poverty and discrimination that were their daily fare. I wish to discuss the conditions under which these women spoke at all: of sex discrimination in their lives and communities, of what it took to challenge their own families, particularly the men. It is these women’s acknowledgment of their actual experiences that illuminated a space for both men and women to speak one of colonialism’s nastiest “domestic” sec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/wic.0.0043

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This philosophy constructs educational systems around objectivity, rationality, and scientific inquiry in ways that give little or no regard to subjectivities, 'felt theories', and other ethical modes of inquiry.

    “This philosophy constructs educational systems around objectivity, rationality, and scientific inquiry in ways that give little or no regard to subjectivities, 'felt theories', and other ethical modes of inquiry (Million 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Million, D.
Corresponding author
Dian Million
Venue
Wicazo Sa Review
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2009
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
53-76
ISSN
  • 0749-6427 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-7901
OpenAlex
W1992271780
Cited by
397
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 19 · 2012: 5
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wicazo Sa Review (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Toronto
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Memory, Trauma, and Testimony
Keywords
Indigenous feminism, affect, colonialism, First Nations women, residential schools, child abuse, personal testimony, Maria Campbell, Lee Maracle, emotional knowledge, assimilation policy, Indigenous self-determination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review